Literature DB >> 31844416

Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance properties of the Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infections in Ahvaz, Iran.

Roya Chabi1, Hassan Momtaz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains are considered to be one of the major causes of human clinical infections in hospitals. The present investigation was done to study the pattern of antibiotic resistance and the prevalence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from human hospital infections.
METHODS: One hundred hospital infectious samples were collected and S. epidermidis strains were identified using culture and biochemical tests. Isolated strains were subjected to disk diffusion and PCR.
RESULTS: Forty-six out of 100 hospital infectious samples (46%) were positive for S. epidermidis. S. epidermidis strains harbored the highest prevalence of resistance against penicillin (95.65%), tetracycline (91.30%), erythromycin (82.60%), cefazolin (78.26%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (73.91%). All S. epidermidis strains had resistance against at least three different types of antibiotics, while the prevalence of resistance against more than seven types of antibiotics was 17.39%. AacA-D (69.56%), tetK (56.52%), mecA (45.65%), msrA (39.13%), and tetM (39.13%) were most commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes. The prevalence of vatC (4.34%), ermA (8.69%), vatA (8.69%), vatB (13.04%), ermC (13.04%), and linA (10.86%) were lower than other detected antibiotic resistance genes. ClfA (32.60%), agrIII (17.39%), and etB (13.04%) were the most commonly detected virulence factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of virulent and multi-drug resistance S. epidermidis strains showed an important public health issue in hospitals.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotic resistance genes; Hospital infections; Iran; Staphylococcus epidermidis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31844416      PMCID: PMC6896349          DOI: 10.1186/s41182-019-0180-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Health        ISSN: 1348-8945


Background

Hospital infections are considered as a major issue all around the world. Bacteria have the highest impact on the occurrence of hospital infections [1-7]. Staphylococcus spp. are commensal bacteria of human skin and have been isolated from diverse clinical sources such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), respiratory tract infections (RTIs), wound infections (WIs), soft tissue infections, blood infections, and endocarditis [3, 8–10]. It has been suggested that Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) is one of the most important species of this group. It is a Gram-positive, non-spore forming, nonmotile, facultative anaerobic, and catalase-positive and coagulase-negative bacterium responsible for different types of hospital and nosocomial infections. Indwelling medical devices are considered a major vector of S. epidermidis in hospitalized patients [11, 12]. S. epidermidis results in approximately 13% of prosthetic valve endocarditis infections, with a high rate of intracardiac abscess formation (38%) and mortality (24%) [13]. S. epidermidis strains usually resist against several types of antibiotic classes such as tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, and macrolides [14-17]. Nowadays, resistant S. epidermidis has become a serious problem in hospitals [14-16]. Resistant staphylococcal strains are responsible for about 100,000 cases of infections with around 10% mortality rate each year in the USA [16]. The presence of certain antibiotic resistance genes is responsible for the occurrence of antibiotic resistance [14-17]. MecA, aacA-D, tetK and tetM, ermA and ermC, msrA and msrB, linA and vatA, and vatB and vatC antibiotic resistance genes are responsible for the occurrence of resistance against methicillin, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B, macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin A groups of antibiotics, respectively [3, 14–17] (Table 1).
Table 1

Antibiotic resistance pattern of the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples

Samples (no. positive samples for S. epidermidis)Antibiotic resistance pattern (%)
P10*CefCip5ClinAzErytMupRifTet30Tri-SulN/F300
UTIs (10)9 (90)7 (70)5 (50)5 (50)5 (50)8 (80)2 (20)5 (50)8 (80)6 (60)2 (20)
WIs (20)19 (95)16 (80)15 (75)13 (65)12 (60)16 (80)11 (55)12 (60)19 (95)15 (75)8 (40)
RTIs (16)16 (100)13 (81.25)12 (75)12 (75)11 (68.75)14 (87.50)10 (62.50)11 (68.75)15 (93.75)13 (81.25)6 (37.50)
Total (46)44 (95.65)36 (78.26)32 (69.56)30 (65.21)28 (60.86)38 (82.60)23 (50)28 (60.86)42 (91.30)34 (73.91)16 (34.78)

*P10 penicillin (10 μg/disk), Cef cefazolin (30 μg/disk), Cip5 ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disk), Clin clindamycin (2 μg/disk), Az azithromycin (15 μg/disk), Eryt erythromycin (15 μg/disk), Mup mupirocin (30 μg/disk), Rif rifampin (5 μg/disk), Tet30 tetracycline (30 μg/disk), Tri-Sul trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg/disk), and N/F300 nitrofurantoin (300 μg/disk) antibiotic agents

Antibiotic resistance pattern of the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples *P10 penicillin (10 μg/disk), Cef cefazolin (30 μg/disk), Cip5 ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disk), Clin clindamycin (2 μg/disk), Az azithromycin (15 μg/disk), Eryt erythromycin (15 μg/disk), Mup mupirocin (30 μg/disk), Rif rifampin (5 μg/disk), Tet30 tetracycline (30 μg/disk), Tri-Sul trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg/disk), and N/F300 nitrofurantoin (300 μg/disk) antibiotic agents Some potential virulence factors including toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1 encoded by tst), exfoliative toxins A and B (eta and etb), clumping factor (clfA), and types I, II, and III of the accessory gene regulator (agr) are responsible for virulence characters of the S. epidermidis strains isolated from human clinical infections [10]. The X-region gene of Staphylococcus strains has a high degree of importance in the occurrence of diseases, and it may have a variation rate (or clock speed) that provides suitable discrimination for outbreak investigation [10]. The IgG-binding region is responsible for causing host specificity and various immunological responses against Staphylococcus strains. The X-region and IgG-binding region have been detected in various types of staphylococcal infections [10]. Scarce researches have been conducted on epidemiological and molecular aspects of the S. epidermidis strains in hospital infections in Iran. Thus, the current research was done to study the prevalence rate, distribution of virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance properties of S. epidermidis strains isolated from various types of human clinical infections collected from Ahvaz city, Iran.

Results

The present investigation was done to assess the antibiotic resistance properties and distribution of virulence genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples. Forty-six out of 100 hospital infectious samples (46%) were positive for S. epidermidis. Table 2 represents the antibiotic resistance pattern of the S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. S. epidermidis strains harbored the highest prevalence of resistance against penicillin (95.65%), tetracycline (91.30%), erythromycin (82.60%), cefazolin (78.26%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (73.91%) antibiotic agents. Reversely, S. epidermidis strains harbored the lowest prevalence of resistance against nitrofurantoin (34.78%) and mupirocin (50%) antibiotic agents. The prevalence of resistance against ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, azithromycin, and rifampin antibiotic agents were 69.56%, 65.21%, 60.86%, and 60.86%, respectively.
Table 2

Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples

Samples (no. positive samples for S. epidermidis)Antibiotic resistance genes (%)
mecAmsrAmsrBAacA-DtetKtetMvatAvatBvatCermAermClinA
UTIs (10)2 (20)2 (20)1 (10)5 (50)4 (40)2 (20)1 (10)1 (10)1 (10)1 (10)1 (10)
WIs (20)10 (50)9 (45)7 (35)16 (80)12 (60)8 (40)2 (10)3 (15)1 (5)2 (10)3 (15)3 (15)
RTIs (16)9 (56.25)7 (43.75)4 (25)11 (68.75)10 (62.50)8 (50)1 (6.25)2 (12.50)1 (6.25)1 (6.25)2 (12.50)1 (6.25)
Total (46)21 (45.65)18 (39.13)12 (26.08)32 (69.56)26 (56.52)18 (39.13)4 (8.69)6 (13.04)2 (4.34)4 (8.69)6 (13.04)5 (10.86)
Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples Figure 1 represents the prevalence of multi-drug resistant S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. Multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis strains were determined as those who had at least simultaneous resistance against three or more than three types of antibiotics. All S. epidermidis strains had resistance against at least three different types of antibiotics, while the prevalence of resistance against more than seven types of antibiotics was 17.39%.
Fig. 1

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis strains in hospital infectious samples

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis strains in hospital infectious samples Table 3 represents the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. We found that aacA-D (69.56%), tetK (56.52%), mecA (45.65%), msrA (39.13%), and tetM (39.13%) were most commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains. The prevalence of vatC (4.34%), ermA (8.69%), vatA (8.69%), vatB (13.04%), ermC (13.04%), and linA (10.86%) were lower than other detected antibiotic resistance genes. The prevalence of msrA and msrB antibiotic resistance genes were 36.13% and 26.08%, respectively.
Table 3

Distribution of virulence factors amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples

Samples (no. positive samples for S. epidermidis)Virulence factors (%)
coaclfAX-regionIgG-binding regiontsst-1etAetBagrIagrIIagrIII
UTIs (10)2 (20)1 (10)1 (10)1 (10)2 (20)
WIs (20)8 (40)1 (5)2 (10)3 (15)2 (10)2 (10)4 (20)
RTIs (16)5 (31.25)1 (6.25)1 (6.25)2 (12.50)1 (6.25)2 (12.50)2 (12.50)
Total (46)15 (32.60)2 (4.34)3 (6.52)6 (13.04)4 (8.69)5 (10.86)8 (17.39)
Distribution of virulence factors amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of hospital infectious samples tetK (56.52%), mecA (45.65%), msrA (39.13%), and tetM (39.13%) were most commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes. The prevalence of vatC (4.34%), ermA (8.69%), vatA (8.69%), vatB (13.04%), ermC (13.04%), and linA (10.86%) were lower. Table 4 represents the distribution of virulence factors amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. We found that clfA (32.60%), agrIII (17.39%), and etB (13.04%) were the most commonly detected virulence factors amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. Virulence factors for coa, X-region, and IgG-binding region were negative.
Table 4

Target genes, oligonucleotide primers, and PCR conditions used for the detection of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes in the S. epidermidis strains isolated from various types of hospital infectious samples

Target genePrimer sequence (5′-3′)PCR product (bp)PCR programsPCR volume (50 μL)
vatA

F: TGGTCCCGGAACAACATTTAT

R: TCCACCGACAATAGAATAGGG

268

1 cycle:

94 °C, 5 min

30 cycles:

94 °C, 60 s

60 °C, 60 s

72 °C, 90 s

1 cycle:

72 °C, 7 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

1.5 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

2.5 μL DNA template

vatB

F: GCTGCGAATTCAGTTGTTACA

R: CTGACCAATCCCACCATTTTA

136
vatC

F: AAGGCCCCAATCCAGAAGAA

R: TCAACGTTCTTTGTCACAACC

467
mecA

F: AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC

R: AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC

532
tetK

F: GTAGCGACAATAGGTAATAGT

R: GTAGTGACAATAAACCTCCTA

360
tetM

F: AGTGGAGCGATTACAGAA

R: CATATGTCCTGGCGTGTCTA

158

1 cycle:

94 °C, 5 min

30 cycles:

94 °C, 60 s

60 °C, 60 s

72 °C, 90 s

1 cycle:

72 °C, 7

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

msrA

F: GGCACAATAAGAGTGTTTAAAGG

R: C AAGTTATATCATGAATAGATTGTCCTGTT

940
msrB

F: TATGATATCCATAATAATTATCCAATC

R: AAGTTATATCATGAATAGATTGTCCTGTT

595
aacA-D

F: TAATCCAAGAGCAATAAGGGC

R: GCCACACTATCATAACCACTA

227
ermA

F: AAGCGGTAAACCCCTCTGA

R: TTCGCAAATCCCTTCTCAAC

190
ermC

F: AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT

R: AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT

229
linA

F: GGTGGCTGGGGGGTAGATGTATTAACTGG

R: GCTTCTTTTGAAATACATGGTATTTTTCGA

323
tsst-1

F: ATGGCAGCATCAGCTTGATA

R: TTTCCAATAACCACCCGTTT

350

1 cycle:

94 °C, 6 min

30 cycles:

94 °C, 2 min

55 °C, 2 min

72 °C, 1 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 8 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

etA

F: CTAGTGCATTTGTTATTCAA

R: TGCATTGACACCATAGTACT

119
etB

F: ACGGCTATATACATTCAATT

R: TCCATCGATAATATACCTAA

200
agrI

F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC

R: GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT

441

1 cycle:

94 °C, 6 min

26 cycle:

94 °C, 30 s

55 °C, 30 s

72 °C, 1 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 8 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

agrII

F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC

R: TATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGGCCATAGC

575
agrIII

F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC

R: GTAATGTAATAGCTTGTATAATAATACCCAG

323
coa

F: CGAGACCAAGATTCAACAAG

R: AAAGAAAACCACTCACATCA

970

1 cycle:

95 °C, 2 min

30 cycles:

95 °C, 30 s

58 °C, 2 min

72 °C, 4 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 7 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

clfA

F: GGCTTCAGTGCTTGTAGG

R: TTTTCAGGGTCAATATAAGC

980

1 cycle:

94 °C, 4 min

35 cycles:

94 °C, 1 min

57 °C, 1 min

72 °C, 1 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 5 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

X-region

F: CAAGCACCAAAAGAGGAA

R: CACCAGGTTTAACGACAT

320

1 cycle:

95 °C, 4 min

25 cycles:

95 °C, 1 min

60 °C, 1 min

72 °C, 1 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 3 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

IgG-binding region

F: CACCTGCTGCAAATGCTGCG

R: GGCTTGTTGTTGTCTTCCTC

920

1 cycle:

94 °C, 2 min

30 cycles:

94 °C, 1 min

58 °C, 1 min

72 °C, 1 min

1 cycle:

72 °C, 5 min

5 μL PCR buffer 10X

2 mM Mgcl2

200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)

0.5 μM of each primers F & R

1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)

5 μL DNA template

Target genes, oligonucleotide primers, and PCR conditions used for the detection of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes in the S. epidermidis strains isolated from various types of hospital infectious samples F: TGGTCCCGGAACAACATTTAT R: TCCACCGACAATAGAATAGGG 1 cycle: 94 °C, 5 min 30 cycles: 94 °C, 60 s 60 °C, 60 s 72 °C, 90 s 1 cycle: 72 °C, 7 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 1.5 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 2.5 μL DNA template F: GCTGCGAATTCAGTTGTTACA R: CTGACCAATCCCACCATTTTA F: AAGGCCCCAATCCAGAAGAA R: TCAACGTTCTTTGTCACAACC F: AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC R: AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC F: GTAGCGACAATAGGTAATAGT R: GTAGTGACAATAAACCTCCTA F: AGTGGAGCGATTACAGAA R: CATATGTCCTGGCGTGTCTA 1 cycle: 94 °C, 5 min 30 cycles: 94 °C, 60 s 60 °C, 60 s 72 °C, 90 s 1 cycle: 72 °C, 7 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: GGCACAATAAGAGTGTTTAAAGG R: C AAGTTATATCATGAATAGATTGTCCTGTT F: TATGATATCCATAATAATTATCCAATC R: AAGTTATATCATGAATAGATTGTCCTGTT F: TAATCCAAGAGCAATAAGGGC R: GCCACACTATCATAACCACTA F: AAGCGGTAAACCCCTCTGA R: TTCGCAAATCCCTTCTCAAC F: AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT R: AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT F: GGTGGCTGGGGGGTAGATGTATTAACTGG R: GCTTCTTTTGAAATACATGGTATTTTTCGA F: ATGGCAGCATCAGCTTGATA R: TTTCCAATAACCACCCGTTT 1 cycle: 94 °C, 6 min 30 cycles: 94 °C, 2 min 55 °C, 2 min 72 °C, 1 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 8 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: CTAGTGCATTTGTTATTCAA R: TGCATTGACACCATAGTACT F: ACGGCTATATACATTCAATT R: TCCATCGATAATATACCTAA F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC R: GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT 1 cycle: 94 °C, 6 min 26 cycle: 94 °C, 30 s 55 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 1 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 8 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC R: TATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGGCCATAGC F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC R: GTAATGTAATAGCTTGTATAATAATACCCAG F: CGAGACCAAGATTCAACAAG R: AAAGAAAACCACTCACATCA 1 cycle: 95 °C, 2 min 30 cycles: 95 °C, 30 s 58 °C, 2 min 72 °C, 4 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 7 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: GGCTTCAGTGCTTGTAGG R: TTTTCAGGGTCAATATAAGC 1 cycle: 94 °C, 4 min 35 cycles: 94 °C, 1 min 57 °C, 1 min 72 °C, 1 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 5 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: CAAGCACCAAAAGAGGAA R: CACCAGGTTTAACGACAT 1 cycle: 95 °C, 4 min 25 cycles: 95 °C, 1 min 60 °C, 1 min 72 °C, 1 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 3 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template F: CACCTGCTGCAAATGCTGCG R: GGCTTGTTGTTGTCTTCCTC 1 cycle: 94 °C, 2 min 30 cycles: 94 °C, 1 min 58 °C, 1 min 72 °C, 1 min 1 cycle: 72 °C, 5 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X 2 mM Mgcl2 200 μM dNTP (Fermentas) 0.5 μM of each primers F & R 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) 5 μL DNA template

Discussion

S. epidermidis is a common commensal bacterium of the human skin and mucosa. While S. epidermidis has long been considered nonpathogenic, it is now recognized as a relevant opportunistic pathogen [11, 12, 14]. Most S. epidermidis-related not only are associated with intravascular devices (prosthetic heart valves, shunts, etc.) but also commonly occur in prosthetic joints, catheters, and large wounds. However, recently published data revealed the high prevalence of S. epidermidis in the cases of human clinical infections [11, 12, 14]. Additionally, nosocomial S. epidermidis isolates were characterized by their pronounced resistance against many commonly used antibiotics [11, 12, 14]. The present study was done to assess the antibiotic resistance pattern and distribution of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from different types of human clinical infections. Findings showed that 46% of human clinical infection samples were positive for S. epidermidis strains. Relatively high prevalence of S. epidermidis in the human clinical infections of the present study is may be due to the ubiquitous presence of the bacterium in the hospital environment, its ability to biofilm formation, and finally failure to observe sanitary and disinfection principles in hospitals in Ahwaz city, Iran. Because of the ubiquitous prevalence of S. epidermidis as a commensal bacterium, it is often difficult for a clinician to decide whether an isolate represents the causative agent of an infection or an unspecific culture contamination. S. epidermidis strains harbored the highest prevalence of resistance against penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, cefazolin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole antibiotic agents. All S. epidermidis strains had resistance against at least three different types of antibiotics. Unauthorized and illegal prescription of antibiotics is the main reason for the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Mohaghegh et al. [18] reported that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of the S. aureus strains against ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, ceftazidime, nalidixic acid, and penicillin were 85%, 80%, 100%, 98.30%, 90.90%, and 90%, respectively. Moreover, the prevalence of resistance against tetracycline (51%), erythromycin (41.20%), oxacillin (97.70%), cephazolin (58.30), and norfloxacin (51.90%) was entirely high [18]. Eladli et al. [19] reported that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of the S. epidermidis strains against amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, mupirocin, oxacillin, rifampin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole antibiotics was 100%, 100%, 37%, 0%, 33%, 16%, 0%, 80%, 0%, 80%, and 0%, respectively. Ma et al. [20] reported that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of the coagulase-negative staphylococci strains against penicillin, oxacillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, ceftizoxime, gentamicin, rifampin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin antibiotics were 94.20%, 79.10%, 89.50%, 59.50%, 53.70%, 52.80%, 58.50%, 39.10%, 26.70%, 29.50%, 18.40%, 2.30, and 0%, respectively. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis was also reported in their investigation. Similar patterns of antibiotic resistance of the S. epidermidis strains were reported from Mexico [21], Spain [22], Iran [23], USA [24], Belgium [25], and Ireland [26]. S. epidermidis strains isolated from the clinical infection samples harbored the high distribution of antibiotic resistance genes, especially aacA-D, tetK, mecA, and tetM. S. epidermidis strains had a considerable prevalence of resistance against clindamycin (65.21%). One of the most imperative mechanisms involving resistance against clindamycin is modulated by methylase enzyme which is often encoded by ermA and ermC genes [27]. The prevalence of ermA and ermC antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains of our research were 8.69% and 10.86%, respectively. The majority of isolates carried two tetracyclines, two erythromycins, one macrolide, and several streptogramin resistance determinants revealed a great diffusion of these types of resistance. The literature-based studies did not indicate any report on the prevalence of vatA, vatB, vatC, msrA, ermA, ermC, linA, aacA-D, tetK, and tetM antibiotic resistance genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infectious samples. Eksi [28] revealed the higher prevalence of ermA than ermc antibiotic resistance genes amongst the clindamycin, erythromycin, and telithromycin-resistant and also higher prevalence of tetM than tetK antibiotic resistance genes amongst the tetracycline-resistant MRSA strains. Duran et al. [17] reported that the distribution of mecA, femA, ermA, ermB, ermC, tetK, tetM, msrA, and blaZ antibiotic resistance genes amongst the coagulase negative staphylococci strains isolated from human clinical infections were 29.60%, 7.50%, 33.10%, 5.80%, 21.60%, 13.70%, 28.80%, 9.40%, and 93.50%, respectively. Adwan et al. [29] reported that the prevalence of ermA, ermC, tetK, tetM, aacA-aphD, vatA, vatB, and vatC genes amongst the staphylococci strains isolated from human infections were 30.90%, 74.50%, 76.40%, 16.40%, 74.50%, 1.80%, 0%, and 5.50%, respectively. High prevalence of tetK and tetM antibiotic resistance genes in the S. epidermidis isolates can be clarified by their usual genetic locations. The presence of tetK gene on small multicopy plasmids and tetM on conjugative transposons contribute to the spread of these determinants [30]. Some of the S. epidermidis strains harbored ermC gene. This gene is often located on small multicopy plasmids which are present in many different staphylococcal species [30]. The ermA gene is usually carried by transposons which could explain its high prevalence amongst the S. epidermidis strains. Resistance to aminoglycosides which are encoded by the aacA-D gene (69.59%) is more prevalent. It is because this gene is usually more diffused in staphylococci of human origin [30]. Amongst all virulence markers found in the S. epidermidis strains, genes encoding clumping factor (clfA), IgG-binding region, toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst), exfoliative toxins (eta and etb), accessory gene regulator (agr), and X-region were recognized as the most important markers in occurrence of infectious diseases caused by S. epidermidis [10]. Eftekhar et al. [31] reported that the frequency of the spa, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, clfA, can, bbp, ebp, etb, eta, pvl, and tst virulence genes amongst the S. aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients was 100%, 75.70%, 74.30%, 78.60%, 71.40%, 24.30%, 0%, 58.60%, 2.90%, 7.10%, 21.40%, and 51.40%, respectively. Additionally, amongst all the examined genes, clfB (78.60%) and etb (2.90%) had the highest and lowest prevalence, respectively. The prevalence of tsst-1 gene amongst the S. epidermidis strains of our research was low (4.34%). Similar findings have also been reported from Iran (11.60%) [32], Sweden (22.00%) [33], Malaysia (0.50%) [34], and Colombia (10.00%) [35]. Tsst-1 gene is a pyrogenic toxin that encodes a 21.9 KDa extracellular toxin causing toxic shock syndrome (TSS). It is known as a severe acute disease distinguished by symptoms such as fever, rash, hypotension, and dysfunction of multiorgan systems. In addition, TSS secretion into the human blood may raise the rate of neonatal TSS-like exanthematous disease, Kawasaki syndrome, and sudden infant death syndrome [32]. Regarding the other detected genes, the eta gene was presented in 6.52% of strains. The prevalence of etb gene was 13.04%. The incidence rate of the eta and etb in the present study was higher than that reported in other investigations conducted on Iran (0.68%) [32], Colombia (3.00%) [35], and Malaysia (0%) [34]. A higher prevalence of eta gene was reported in studies conducted in Czech (10.00%) [36] and Turkey (19.20%) [37]. It was detected that the prevalence of the etb gene differs amongst numerous investigations, ranging from 0% in Colombia [35] and Malaysia [34] to 9.20% in Turkey [37]. Ghasemian et al. [38] reported the high prevalence of the clfA and clfB genes (100%). The incidence of the clfA gene in the bacterial strains of our research was relatively high (32.60%). A higher prevalence of this gene was reported from Brazil [39] and China [40]. Another important detected gene amongst the S. epidermidis strains was agr. The prevalence of agrI, agrII, and agrIII virulence genes amongst the S. epidermidis strains were 8.69%, 10.86%, and 17.39%, respectively. Agr virulence gene was also predominant amongst the S. epidermidis strains isolated from clinical samples recovered from China [40], USA [41], and Iran [42]. The accessory gene regulator (agr) locus influences the expression of many virulence genes in the S. epidermidis. Four allelic groups of agr, which generally inhibit the regulatory activity of each other, have been identified within the species. Interference in virulence gene expression caused by different agr groups has been suggested to be a mechanism for isolating bacterial populations and a fundamental basis for subdividing the species [43]. It encodes a two-component signal transduction system that leads to downregulation of surface proteins and upregulation of secreted proteins during in vitro growth. A role for agr in virulence has been demonstrated by the attenuated virulence of agr mutants in different animal infection models [43].

Conclusions

The present investigation is the first report of the phenotypic and genotypic analysis of antibiotic resistance in the S. epidermidis strains isolated from human hospital infectious samples in Iran. The total prevalence of S. epidermidis strains in hospital infectious samples was 46%. Considerable prevalence of resistance against penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, cefazolin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and high distribution of aacA-D, tetK, mecA, and tetM antibiotic resistance genes may pose a potential public health threat. Additionally, clfA, agrIII, and etB were the most commonly detected virulence factors. A high prevalence of multi-drug resistant S. epidermidis in the human clinical infectious samples is another important finding of the present study. Moreover, the presence of antibiotic resistance genes and also virulence factors in some S. epidermidis strains should be considered as a serious health hazard. Further researches are required to understand additional epidemiological aspects such as the exact relations between antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors of the S. epidermidis strains in hospital infectious samples.

Methods

Samples

From February to July 2018, a total of 100 various types of hospital infectious samples were randomly collected from several private hospitals of the Ahvaz city, Iran. Hospital infectious samples were defined as those which were collected from hospitalized patients with severe infections such as UTIs, WIs, and RIs. Furthermore, samples were taken from the site of infection. Samples were immediately transferred to the Clinical Microbiology Research Center of the Islamic Azad University of Shahrekord in a cooler with ice packs.

Bacterial isolation

S. epidermidis was identified by conventional bacteriological tests. The sample was enriched in a tryptic soy broth, and grown on mannitol salt agar, and then catalase, tube coagulase and urease tests, and carbohydrate fermentation were performed. S. epidermidis is catalase-positive, coagulase-negative, urease-positive, unable to ferment D-mannitol and D-trehalose, and able to ferment D-mannose and D-maltose [44, 45].

Antibiotic resistance pattern

Patterns of antimicrobial resistance of the S. epidermidis strains were studied using the Kirby-Bauer method. A simple disk diffusion technique on the Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) medium was used for this purpose. susceptibility of S. epidermidis isolates was tested against several types of antibiotic agents including penicillin (10 μg/disk), cefazolin (30 μg/disk), clindamycin (2 μg/disk), mupirocin (30 μg/disk), azithromycin (15 μg/disk), erythromycin (15 μg/disk), tetracycline (30 μg/disk), ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disk), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg/disk), nitrofurantoin (300 μg/disk), and rifampin (5 μg/disk) (Oxoid, UK). The instructions of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were used for this purpose [46]. The plates containing the disks were allowed to stand for at least 30 min before incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The diameter of the zone of inhibition produced by each antibiotic disc was measured and interpreted using the CLSI zone diameter interpretative standards [46]. S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was used as a quality control organism in antimicrobial susceptibility determination.

DNA extraction and amplification of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes

S. epidermidis isolates were sub-cultured on TSB media (Merck, Germany) and further incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies using the DNA extraction kit (Fermentas, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Table 1 represents the list of primers and PCR conditions used for the amplification of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes [47]. A programmable DNA thermo-cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler 5330, Eppendorf-Nethel-Hinz GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used in all PCR reactions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS 21.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact two-tailed test were used to assess any significant relationship between the prevalence of S. epidermidis strains, virulence factors, and their antibiotic resistance properties. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistical significant level.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections on implants.

Authors:  W F Oliveira; P M S Silva; R C S Silva; G M M Silva; G Machado; L C B B Coelho; M T S Correia
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Staphylococcus epidermidis: emerging resistance and need for alternative agents.

Authors:  I Raad; A Alrahwan; K Rolston
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Adhesin and superantigen genes and the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to colonize the infantile gut.

Authors:  Forough L Nowrouzian; Olivier Dauwalder; Helene Meugnier; Michele Bes; Jerome Etienne; François Vandenesch; Erika Lindberg; Bill Hesselmar; Robert Saalman; Inga-Lisa Strannegård; Nils Aberg; Ingegerd Adlerberth; Agnes E Wold; Gerard Lina
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Staphylococcus epidermidis BV: antibiotic resistance patterns, physiological characteristics, and bacteriophage susceptibility.

Authors:  S Schaefler
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-10

5.  Analysis of Virulence Genes Among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Strains.

Authors:  Seyedeh Mahsan Hoseini Alfatemi; Mohammad Motamedifar; Nahal Hadi; Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim Saraie
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 0.747

6.  Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Various Types of Vegetables and Salads.

Authors:  Shahrzad Atapoor; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Ebrahim Rahimi
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 0.747

7.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital food.

Authors:  Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Hasan Gandomi; Afshin Akhondzadeh Basti; Ali Misaghi; Ebrahim Rahimi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.887

8.  Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Production in Staphylococcus epidermidis Strains, Isolated from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mexico City.

Authors:  Roberto Cabrera-Contreras; Rubén Morelos-Ramírez; Ada Nelly Galicia-Camacho; Enrique Meléndez-Herrada
Journal:  ISRN Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-03

9.  Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitic milk: serogroups, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties.

Authors:  Hassan Momtaz; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Taghi Taktaz; Amir Rezvani; Sajad Yarali
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Antibiotic resistance genes & susceptibility patterns in staphylococci.

Authors:  Nizami Duran; Burcin Ozer; Gulay Gulbol Duran; Yusuf Onlen; Cemil Demir
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  9 in total

1.  Occurrence of bacteria belonging to the genus Enterococcus and Staphylococcus on inanimate surfaces of selected hospital facilities and their nosocomial significance.

Authors:  Ondrej Zahornacký; Štefan Porubčin; Alena Rovňáková; Pavol Jarčuška; Štefánia Andraščíková; Kvetoslava Rimárová
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Myrica cerifera, a Medicinal Plant of the Lumbee Tribe, has Antibacterial and Nematicidal Properties.

Authors:  Ashley Edwards; Kazhmiri Deberry; Hannah Mariani; Darian H Taylor; Nicholas J Cochran; Ana C Barrios Sosa; Andrea Regan Scott; R Thomas Williamson; Cornelia Tirla; Conner Sandefur; Courtney Carroll Alexander
Journal:  Am J Undergrad Res       Date:  2022-06

3.  Highly Synergistic Effects of Melittin With Vancomycin and Rifampin Against Vancomycin and Rifampin Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Rasoul Mirzaei; Mohammad Yousef Alikhani; Carla Renata Arciola; Iraj Sedighi; GholamReza Irajian; Elaheh Jamasbi; Rasoul Yousefimashouf; Kamran Pooshang Bagheri
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Hospital Wastewater in Kermanshah, Iran.

Authors:  Alisha Akya; Roya Chegenelorestani; Jila Shahvaisi-Zadeh; Arezoo Bozorgomid
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  Microbial Landscape and Antibiotic Susceptibility Dynamics of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Kazakhstan 2018-2020.

Authors:  Sholpan S Kaliyeva; Alyona V Lavrinenko; Yerbol Tishkambayev; Gulzira Zhussupova; Aissulu Issabekova; Dinara Begesheva; Natalya Simokhina
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 6.  Antibacterial pyrazoles: tackling resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alam
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.808

7.  Biomimetic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ethyl Acetate Extract of Urtica diocia Leaves; Characterizations and Emerging Antimicrobial Activity.

Authors:  Mohammed Binsalah; Sandhanasamy Devanesan; Mohamad S AlSalhi; Abdullrahman Nooh; Osama Alghamdi; Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  Chemistry and Bioactivity of Microsorum scolopendria (Polypodiaceae): Antioxidant Effects on an Epithelial Damage Model.

Authors:  Cristóbal Balada; Valentina Díaz; Mónica Castro; Macarena Echeverría-Bugueño; María José Marchant; Leda Guzmán
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection obtained in two time periods.

Authors:  Verónica I Martínez-Santos; David A Torres-Añorve; Gabriela Echániz-Aviles; Isela Parra-Rojas; Arturo Ramírez-Peralta; Natividad Castro-Alarcón
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.061

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.