Literature DB >> 23213293

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitic milk: serogroups, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties.

Hassan Momtaz1, Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi, Taghi Taktaz, Amir Rezvani, Sajad Yarali.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to detect the virulence factors, serogroups, and antibiotic resistance properties of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, by using 268 bovine mastitic milk samples which were diagnosed using California Mastitis Test. After E. coli identification, PCR assays were developed for detection of different virulence genes, serogroups, and antibiotic resistance genes of Escherichia coli. The antibiotic resistance pattern was studied using disk diffusion method. Out of 268 samples, 73 (27.23%) were positive for Escherichia coli, and, out of 73 positive samples, 15 (20.54%) were O26 and 11 (15.06%) were O157 so they were the highest while O111 was not detected in any sample so it was the lowest serogroup. Out of 73 STEC strains, 11 (15.06%) and 36 (49.31%) were EHEC and AEEC, respectively. All of the EHEC strains had stx1, eaeA, and ehly, virulence genes, while in AEEC strains stx1 had the highest prevalence (77.77%), followed by eaeA (55.55%). Totally, aadA1 (65.95%) had the highest while blaSHV (6.38%) had the lowest prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes. The disk diffusion method showed that the STEC strains had the highest resistance to penicillin (100%), followed by tetracycline (57.44%), while resistance to cephalothin (6.38%) was the lowest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23213293      PMCID: PMC3507047          DOI: 10.1100/2012/618709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


1. Introduction

Milk is raised as a complete food especially for children and seniors. Its high value for proteins, minerals, fats, and vitamins is undeniable. It is the primary source of nutrition for young mammals before they are able to digest other types of foods. In addition, milk has been processed into various dairy products such as cheese, cream, butter, yogurt, kefir, and ice cream. Daily, millions of people use milk and dairy products. Milk production has a complex process which is done due to activity of bovine mammary glands. The hygienic quality of milking room and animals has a high importance in milk production, but in cases of low hygienic conditions several infections and illnesses occurred in udder tissue. Mastitis is considered the most costly disease in dairy herds due to discarded milk and lowered milk production for approximately 80% of costs associated with mastitis, treatment costs, veterinary fees, labor costs early culling, and death [1]. In addition, lowered milk quality due to increased somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk decreases shelf life of milk and cheese making quality [2]. Previous study showed that bacteremia occurs in a significant proportion of cows with severe systemic disease signs [3]. Besides, the quality and hygiene of milk are changed due to mastitis and usually cannot be used for human and animal consumption. Usually in all mastitic cases the amount of milk production reduced. An increase of 25% on world milk demand between 2007 and 2020 is expected [4]. Dairy cattle with acute coliform mastitis, caused primarily by Escherichia coli (E. coli), exhibit a wide range of systemic disease severity, from mild, with only local inflammatory changes of the mammary gland, to severe, with significant systemic signs including rumen stasis, dehydration, shock, and even death [3]. E. coli strains can further be classified according to the presence of virulence factors such as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), attaching and effacing E. coli (AEEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC or VTEC) [5-8]. Several studies showed that STEC strains are an important group for mastitis [9, 10]. Previous study showed that, from all serogroups of STEC strains, O55. O111, O124, O119, O114, O26, O157, and O44 are the most prevalent serotypes of E. coli isolated from mastitic milk [1]. Numerous studies to identify virulence factors of E. coli isolated from cows with clinical mastitis have been conducted [11]. Studies showed that Shiga toxins (Stx1, Stx2) and eae (intimin) are the most important virulence genes in E. coli strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk [10, 12, 13]. The cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) toxins (CNF1 and CNF2 genes) are associated with damage to vascular endothelial cells and thrombotic microangiopathy. Mainly, treatment of diseases caused by this bacterium often requires antimicrobial therapy; however, antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria cause more severe diseases for longer periods of time than their antibiotic-susceptible counterparts. Several studies showed that antibiotic resistant in E. coli is increasing in these days [14-16]. Therefore, identification of resistance genes of bacteria seems to be so essential in reduction of treatment costs. There is no previous data about detection of virulence genes, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli strains isolated from cow in Iran so this present study was carried out for molecular characterization of STEC strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Detecting E. coli

Overall 268 bovine mastitic raw milk samples were collected from centers from several geographic regions of Iran, from January 2011 to March 2012. The animals selected for this study were clinically healthy, and the milk samples showed normal physical characteristics. In this study, mastitic milks were identified by the California Mastitis Test (CMT). Samples (5 mL, in sterile glass containers) were transported to the laboratory at ca. 4°C within a maximum of 6–12 h after sampling. Samples were cultured in MacConkey (MAC) agar (Merck, Germany). Agar plates were incubated at 37°C, and bacterial growth was evaluated after 24 and 48 h. Gram-negative microorganisms were isolated from MAC agar and determined at the species level using cytochrome oxidase, triple sugar iron agar, urea, and indole tests as putatively E. coli [17].

2.2. DNA Isolation

Bacterial strains were overnight grown in trypticase soy agar (TSA-Merck, German) at 37°C. One colony was suspended in 100 μL of sterile distilled water. After boiling the suspension for 13 min; this was followed by freezing and subsequently centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min to pellet the cell debris [18]. The supernatant was used as a template for amplification reaction.

2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction

Tables 1, 2, and 3 showed the list of primers which were used for detection of serogroups, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance genes of STEC strains isolated from mastitic milk samples. Table 4 showed the PCR conditions for detection of serogroups, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance genes in STEC strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk samples. In all PCR reactions, a DNA thermocycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler, Eppendorf-Nethel-Hinz GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used. The amplified products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining after gel electrophoresis of 10 μL of the final reaction mixture in 1.5% agarose.
Table 1

Primers used for detection of virulence genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitis.

Virulence factorPrimers namePrimer sequences (5′-3′)Product size (bp)Reference
Shiga toxin 1 (stx1) Stx1fAAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTACTTCT366 [20]
Stx1rTGCCATTCTGGCAACTCGCGATGCA
Shiga toxin 2 (stx2) Stx2fCGATCGTCACTCACTGGTTTCATCA282 [20]
Stx2rGGATATTCTCCCCACTCTGACACC
Enteropathogenic attachment and effacement (eaeA)EAE1TGCGGCACAACAGGCGGCGA629 [21]
EAE2CGGTCGCCGCACCAGGATTC
Haemolysin (ehly)Hly FCAATGCAGATGCAGATACCG432 [22]
Hly RCAGAGATGTCGTTGCAGCAG
Table 2

Primers used for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis.

Primer nameSequenceSize of product (bp)Target geneReference
O26-FCAG AAT GGT TAT GCT ACT GT423 wzx [23]
O26-RCTT ACA TTT GTT TTC GGC ATC
O103-FTTGGAGCGTTAACTGGACCT321 wzx [23]
O103-RGCTCCCGAGCACGTATAAG
O111-FTAG AGA AAT TAT CAA GTT AGT TCC406 wzx [23]
O111-R ATA GTT ATG AAC ATC TTG TTT AGC
O145-F CCATCAACAGATTTAGGAGTG 609 wzx [23]
O145-RTTTCTACCGCGAATCTATC
O157-FCGG ACA TCC ATG TGA TAT GG259 wzx [23]
O157-RTTG CCT ATG TAC AGC TAA TCC
O45-F CCG GGT TTC GAT TTG TGA AGG TTG 527 wzx1 [24]
O45-RCAC AAC AGC CAC TAC TAG GCA GAA
O91-F GCTGACCTTCATGATCTGTTGA 291 gnd [25]
O91-RTAATTTAACCCGTAGAATCGCTGC
O113-F GGGTTAGATGGAGCGCTATTGAGA 771 wzx [26]
O113-RAGGTCACCCTCTGAATTATGGCAG
O121-F TGGCTAGTGGCATTCTGATG 322 wzx [27]
O121-RTGATACTTTAGCCGCCCTTG
O128-FGCTTTCTGCCGATATTTGGC289 galF [28]
O128-RCCGACGGACTGATGCCGGTGATT
Table 3

Primers used for detection of antimicrobial resistant genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitis.

AntibioticResistant geneSequenceSize of product (bp)Annealing temperature (°C)References
Streptomycin aadA1 (F) TATCCAGCTAAGCGCGAACT44758 [29]
(R) ATTTGCCGACTACCTTGGTC
Tetracycline tetA (F) GGTTCACTCGAACGACGTCA57757 [29]
(R) CTGTCCGACAAGTTGCATGA
Tetracycline tetB (F) CCTCAGCTTCTCAACGCGTG63456 [29]
(R) GCACCTTGCTGATGACTCTT
Trimethoprim dfrA1 (F) GGAGTGCCAAAGGTGAACAGC36745 [30]
(R) GAGGCGAAGTCTTGGGTAAAAAC
Fluoroquinolone qnr (F) GGGTATGGATATTATTGATAAAG67050 [31]
(R) CTAATCCGGCAGCACTATTTA
Gentamicin aac(3)-IV (F) CTTCAGGATGGCAAGTTGGT28655 [32]
(R) TCATCTCGTTCTCCGCTCAT
Sulfonamide sul1 (F) TTCGGCATTCTGAATCTCAC82247 [32]
(R) ATGATCTAACCCTCGGTCTC
Cephalothin blaSHV (F) TCGCCTGTGTATTATCTCCC76852 [32]
(R) CGCAGATAAATCACCACAATG
Ampicillin CITM (F) TGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA46247 [32]
(R) TTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC
Chloramphenicol cat1 (F) AGTTGCTCAATGTACCTATAACC54755 [32]
(R) TTGTAATTCATTAAGCATTCTGCC
Chloramphenicol cmlA (F) CCGCCACGGTGTTGTTGTTATC69855 [32]
(R) CACCTTGCCTGCCCATCATTAG
Table 4

PCR conditions for detection of serogroups, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in bovine mastitis.

GenePCR programPCR volume (50 μL)
O157, O145, O103, O26, O1111 cycle:95°C—3 min30 cycle:95°C—20 s58°C—40 s72°C—30 s1 cycle:72°C—8 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X1.5 mM MgCl2
200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)0.5 μM of each primers F and R1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)2.5 μL DNA template

O91, O128, O121, O113, O451 cycle:94°C—6 min34 cycle:95°C—50 s58°C—70 s72°C—55 s1 cycle:72°C—10 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X2 mM MgCl2
150 μM dNTP (Fermentas)0.75 μM of each primers F and R1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)3 μL DNA template

stx1, stx2, eaeA, ehly 1 cycle:95°C—3 min34 cycle:94°C—60 s56°C—45 s72°C—60 s1 cycle:72°C—10 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X2 mM MgCl2
200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)0.5 μM of each primers F and R1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)5 μL DNA template

aadA1, tetA, tetB, dfrA1, qnr, aac(3)-IV, sul1, blaSHV, CITM, cat1, cmlA 1 cycle:94°C—8 min32 cycle:95°C—60 s55°C—70 s72°C—2 min1 cycle:72°C—8 min 5 μL PCR buffer 10X2.5 mM MgCl2
200 μM dNTP (Fermentas)0.5 μM of each primers F and R2 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)3 μL DNA template

2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using Mueller-Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India, MV1084), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) [19]. After incubating the inoculated plate aerobically at 37°C for 18–24 h in an aerobic atmosphere, the susceptibility of the E. coli isolates to each antimicrobial agent was measured and the results were interpreted in accordance with interpretive criteria provided by CLSI (2006). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control organisms in antimicrobial susceptibility determination.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS/16.0 software for significant relationship between incidences of virulence factors and antibiotics resistance genes of E. coli isolated from various dairy products. Statistical significance was regarded at a P value < 0.05.

3. Results

In the current study, all E. coli colonies were tested by applying PCR method in order to detect 16S rRNA gene of bacterium. According to data, out of 268 bovine mastitic milk samples, 73 (27.23%) were positive for presence of E. coli (Table 5). Therefore, it was shown that incidence of E. coli in bovine mastitic milk was high. From a total of 73 E. coli positive samples, 36 (49.31%) were AEEC and 11 (15.06%) were EHEC subtypes (Table 6). In the other hand, 26 samples (35.61%) were diagnosed as nondetected serotypes (Table 6). Results showed that all of the 11 positive EHEC serogroups had stx1, eaeA, ehly virulence genes, while in AEEC serogroups, 28 (77.77%), 5 (13.88%), and 20 (55.55%) samples had stx1, stx2, and eaeA virulence genes, respectively (Table 6). Significant differences (P < 0.05) were shown between the presences of AEEC and EHEC serogroups in mastitic milk samples.
Table 5

Prevalence of Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitis.

Number of samplesNumber of positive samples
26873 (27.23%)
Table 6

Distribution of virulence factors in Escherichia coli subtypes isolated from bovine mastitis.

SubtypesNumber of positive samplesVirulence gene
Nondetected26 (35.61%)
EHEC11 (15.06%) stx1, eaeA, ehly: 11 (100%)
AEEC36 (49.31%) stx1: 28 (77.77%)
stx2: 5 (13.88%)
eaeA: 20 (55.55%)
stx1, eaeA: 23 (63.88%)
stx2, eaeA: 8 (22.22%)
stx1, stx2, eaeA: 5 (13.88%)

Total73 (27.23%)
By applying specific primers for detection of STEC serogroups in mastitic milk samples, it was indicated that, out of 73 positive samples for E. coli, 15 (20.54%) and 11 (15.06%) samples were positive for incidences of O26 and O157 serogroups while O111, O45, O121, and O128 serogroups had a lower incidences (0.0%, 2.73%, 2.73%, and 2.73%, resp.) (Table 7). In the other hand, 26 (35.61%) samples have been determined as nondetected serogroups. Statistical analysis of data indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between total presence of O26 with O111, O45, O121, and O128 serogroups.
Table 7

Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis.

SerogroupO157O26O103O111O145O45O91O113O121O128Nondetected
Total1115332632226
(73)(15.06%) (20.54%)(4.10%) (4.10%)(2.73%)(8.21%)(4.10%)(2.73%)(2.73%)(35.61%)
Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis showed that aadA1 had the highest prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes (65.95%), followed by Sul1 (57.44%) and dfrA1 (55.31%) while blaSHV (6.38%) and CITM (12.76%) had the lowest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes (Table 8). Besides, O26 serotype had the highest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes while O111 had the lowest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolated from mastitic milk samples. Statistical analysis of data indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between total presence of aadA1 with blaSHV, CITM and cmlA, Sul1 with blaSHV, CITM and dfrA1 with blaSHV gene.
Table 8

Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis.

aadA1 tetA tetB dfrA1 qnr aac(3)-IV sul1 blaSHV CITM cat1 cmlA
O157(11) 76456291132
O26(15) 12837536152
O103(3) 2123232
O111(-)
O145(3) 22121111
O45(2) 111112
O91(6) 432424422
O113(3) 22322111
O121(2) 1111221
O128(2)211

Total(47)31(65.95%)23(48.93%)16(34.04%)26(55.31%)17(36.17%)13(27.65%)27(57.44%)3(6.38%)6(12.76%)16(34.04%)7(14.89%)
The disk diffusion method indicated that the STEC serogroups had the highest resistance to penicillin (100%), followed by tetracycline (57.44%), lincomycin (55.31%), streptomycin (48.93%), ampicillin (46.80%), and sulfamethoxazole, (40.42%) but resistance to cephalothin (6.38%), ciprofloxacin (10.63%), and nitrofurantoin (10.63%) was the lowest (Table 9). Significant differences were seen between level of resistance to penicillin with cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin (P < 0.05) and tetracycline and lincomycin only with cephalothin.
Table 9

Antibiotic resistance properties in STEC serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis (disk diffusion method).

STESSerogroupsP10*TE30S10C30SXTGM10NFX5L2CF30CIP5TMP5F/M300AM10
O157(11) 11964824512316
O26(15) 1511106423101518
O103(3) 3311212212
O111(-)
O145(3) 311111
O45(2) 2112111
O91(6) 63121241113
O113(3) 3112221
O121(2) 21111111
O128(2) 211111111

Total(47)47(100)27(57.44)23(48.93)18(38.29)19(40.42)8(17.02)11(23.40)26(55.31)3(6.38)5(10.63)15(31.91)5(10.63)22(46.80)

*In this table, P10: penicillin (10 u/disk); TE30: tetracycline (30 μg/disk); S10: streptomycin (10 μg/disk); C30: chloramphenicol (30 μg/disk); SXT: sulfamethoxazole (25 μg/disk); GM10: gentamycin (10 μg/disk); NFX5: enrofloxacin (5 μg/disk); L2: lincomycin (2 μg/disk); CF30: cephalothin (30 μg/disk); CIP5: ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disk); TMP5: trimethoprim (5 μg/disk); F/M300: nitrofurantoin (300 μg/disk); AM10: ampicillin (10 u/disk).

4. Discussion

Our results showed that the STEC strains can cause mastitis in bovine and reduce milk quality for human consumption because some of mastitic cases are subclinical and its diagnosis only is based on the accurate diagnostic tests. Therefore, application of accurate and sensitive assays for detection of subclinical mastitic milks is essential. The rules of milk inspection and control are more important in cases where raw milk is consumed. Several outbreaks of diseases due to E. coli [33, 34] showed that inspection and control of food and especially foods with animal origin is a golden key to reducing the risk of contamination. There are many studies which showed that the STEC strains are the most prevalent resources for milk-poisoning [7, 35, 36]. Our results showed that the milk of animals with mastitis and especially subclinical mastitis is the main resource for STEC strains. In addition to unsanitary conditions in milk collection and processing, methods of milking, unsanitary conditions of milking machine, and preventing contamination of raw milk with extrinsic factors like staff, insects, and dust, the primary hygiene of milk can be important in presences of STEC strains in milk. Unfortunately, the mechanism of mastitis in bovine herds is not clear. E. coli is one of the most frequent bacteria in the environments and, following parturition and the onset of lactation, the immune system is less able to react appropriately to bacterial challenges. Therefore, mastitis occurred due to E. coli. A combination of metabolic and hormonal influences may temporarily suppress the immune system in the periparturient period. Additionally, the altered nutritional and energy demands that occur in the periparturient cow during the last trimester and early lactation increase fat metabolism, leading to a buildup of ketone metabolites (ketosis), which also negatively impact the microbicidal properties of circulating neutrophils and increase the cow's susceptibility to mastitis [37]. This temporary and transient immunosuppression increases the cow's susceptibility to opportunistic organisms and increases the likelihood for environmental bacteria to invade the udder and cause mastitis [37, 38]. Our results showed that 27.23% of all milk samples were positive for presence of E. coli and from these positive samples, O26 serogroup, stx1 gene, aadA1 antibiotic resistance gene, and resistance to penicillin antibiotic have the highest frequencies in bovine mastitic milk samples. Previous study [1] showed that, from a total of 181 mastitic milk samples, 57 were positive for E. coli and, from these numbers, 19.2%, 15.8%, 12.3%, 12.3%, 10.5%, 7%, 7%, and 3.5% were O55, O111, O124, O119, O114, O26, O157, and O44 serogroups which was inconsistent with our results. Another study [39] showed that, from 40 mastitic milk samples, 77.4% of the isolates belonged to four different O serogroups (O26, O86, O111, and O127) which was in agreement with our results. Bean et al. [40] evaluated the “health status” of cows from which isolates were obtained to study virulence genes. In addition to it, in the majority of cases, presence of STEC strains is related to attendance of various virulence genes. Previous study in Egypt [39] revealed that all E. coli strains which were isolated from mastitic milk samples had stx1, stx2, hylA, Flic(h7), stb, F41, K99, sta, F17, LT-I, LT-II, and eaeA virulence genes. Another study confirmed that the stx2 and eaeA genes were the most prevalent virulence factors in cow's environment that is contaminated by feces, and it is also a frequent cause of bovine mastitis [41]. Study in Turkey indicated that genes encoding Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (stx1 and stx2), intimin (eaeA), heat-stable enterotoxin a (Sta), and F5 (K99), F41, and F17 fimbriae were the most prevalent virulence factors which were isolated from clinical bovine mastitis cases [9]. Previous study from Iran showed that out of 400 samples, 42 specimens were found to be E. coli positive and 14 out of 42 isolates carried the eaeA gene, 4 isolates were positive for the gene of F41fimbriae and 10 for stxI and stxII genes [42]. Another investigation on mastitic milk samples during 17 months showed that the most common virulence gene detected was stx1, with a prevalence of 31%, followed by cnf2 (7.5%), vt2e (6.25%), and eaeA (4%) which was in agreement with our study [40]. Some studies indicated that, in addition to virulence genes like stx1, stx2, eae, and ehly, the presence of STEC strains is mainly accompanied by attendance of antibiotic resistance genes [11, 43]. Unfortunately studying of the antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli strains isolated from mastic milk samples has been done very rare. In one study, of the 123 E. coli strains isolated from milk, 15 (10.7%) had a single virulence gene detected by PCR and CNF2 is the most common virulence gene which was identified [11], but our study showed that the aadA1 was the most common virulence gene in mastitic milk samples (65.95%). Another study showed that S and P fimbriae, CNF1, and CNF2 are the most common virulence genes in E. coli isolated from mastitic milk samples [44]. Despite the presence of these numerous antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli strains isolated from mastitic milk samples, developing resistance against common antibiotic drugs is not unexpected. Our results showed that resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and lincomycin was the highest, while previous study showed that the predominantly observed resistance was to tetracycline (92.2%), streptomycin (90.4%), nalidixic acid (88.3%), amikacin (86.5%), and cephalothin (84.8%). Multidrug resistance was found among 152 isolates (65.8%) [36]. Langoni et al. [45] reported a discrete level of resistance to tetracycline (13.0%) and ampicillin (12.0%) among E. coli isolates from bovine mastitis which was lower than our results. Studies performed in the United States indicate that there is no correlation among increased resistance and antimicrobials that are commonly used in dairy cattle for treatment of mastitis [46, 47]. In Switzerland [48], there was no increased antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens during the last 20 years, indicating different points of view about this theme. Our results are in contrast with previous study in Switzerland and, in addition to common used antibiotics, the E. coli strains which were isolated from mastitic milk samples in our study even had resistance to chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin. Chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin are forbidden antibiotics, and the high antibiotic resistance to them in our study indicated the irregular and unauthorized uses of these antibiotics in veterinary treatment in Iran. Unfortunately, veterinarians in many fields of veterinary such as large animal internal medicine, poultry, and even aquaculture use these antibiotics as a basic one. Therefore, in a very short period of time, antibiotic resistance will appear. Therefore, prescription of antibiotics and prescribed antibiotics has the highest effects on providing of antibiotic resistance. In addition to our study, the multiple antibiotic resistance has been reported by Spînu et al. [49], Rangel and Marin [50], Maidhof et al. [51], Mora et al. [52], and Lira et al. [53]. In total the finding which is common between our study and previous researches [54-56] is the high resistance of STEC strains isolated from milk to tetracycline. Therefore, in these situation not only in our country (Iran), nut also all around the world, prescription of tetracycline and penicillin is not effective for the cases of coliforms bovine mastitis. On the other hand, in the current situation in Iran, the use of cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin, due to low antibiotic resistance, can be more effective for treatment of diseases caused by E. coli. This survey indicated the highest antimicrobial resistance in O26 and O157 serogroups. Totally E. coli antibiotic resistance against common antibiotics which are used in veterinary in Iran was so high. We recommended (i) vaccination of dairy animals (if necessary), observe hygiene in animal's platform, improving methods of milking, checking milking halls in order to detect E. coli especially in the animal feces monthly, fumigating milking halls frequently, observing hygiene during milking for prevent E.coli mastitis; (ii) using PCR method as an accurate, safe, and fast diagnostic one for accurate detection of pathogens in mastitic milks; (iii) using simple disk diffusion method in order to evaluate the antibiotic resistance of pathogens in mastitis cases; (iv) due to antibiotic resistance especially in E. coli, the veterinarians should pay more attention to prescribing the antibiotics; (v) in order to prevent antibiotic resistance in bacteria, we should apply antibiotics more cautiously in animals, detect resistance genes, and finally use different antibiotics periodically. Our results recommended the use of PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes of bacteria as a safe, rapid, and accurate method in laboratories.
  42 in total

1.  Phylogeny, virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated in clinical bovine mastitis.

Authors:  Leena Suojala; Tarja Pohjanvirta; Heli Simojoki; Anna-Liisa Myllyniemi; Anna Pitkälä; Sinikka Pelkonen; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Escherichia coli isolates' serotypes, genotypes, and virulence genes and clinical coliform mastitis severity.

Authors:  J R Wenz; G M Barrington; F B Garry; R P Ellis; R J Magnuson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Virulence factors profile of drug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infections in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  M Idress; U Mussarat; Y Badshah; R Qamar; H Bokhari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of antibiotic resistance of udder pathogens in dairy cows kept on organic and on conventional farms.

Authors:  M Roesch; V Perreten; M G Doherr; W Schaeren; M Schällibaum; J W Blum
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Development of a serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assay to detect a set of Escherichia coli serogroups based on the identification of their O-antigen gene clusters.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Xiaojuan Ruan; Dongmei Wei; Zhidong Hu; Lixia Wu; Ting Yu; Lu Feng; Lei Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Safety of raw meat and shellfish in Vietnam: an analysis of Escherichia coli isolations for antibiotic resistance and virulence genes.

Authors:  Thi Thu Hao Van; James Chin; Toni Chapman; Linh Thuoc Tran; Peter J Coloe
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Swiss raw milk cheeses collected at producer level.

Authors:  R Stephan; S Schumacher; S Corti; G Krause; J Danuser; L Beutin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Occurrence, virulence genes and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from raw bovine, caprine and ovine milk in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Solomakos; Alexandros Govaris; Apostolos S Angelidis; Spyros Pournaras; Angeliki Rothi Burriel; Spyridon K Kritas; Demetrios K Papageorgiou
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.516

9.  Metabolic and genetic profiling of clinical O157 and non-O157 Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Björn Possé; Lieven De Zutter; Marc Heyndrickx; Lieve Herman
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.992

10.  Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in Escherichia coli from Swedish dairy calves.

Authors:  Kerstin de Verdier; Ann Nyman; Christina Greko; Björn Bengtsson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  17 in total

1.  Molecular detection of virulence genes and multi-drug resistance patterns in Escherichia coli (STEC) in clinical bovine mastitis: Alborz province, Iran.

Authors:  M Tavakoli; H Pourtaghi
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.376

2.  Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Bovine Mastitis Milk Origin Bacteria and Linkage of Intramammary Infection With Milk Quality.

Authors:  Zul I Huma; Neelesh Sharma; Savleen Kour; Sung Jin Lee
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Effects of probiotic, cinnamon, and synbiotic supplementation on glycemic control and antioxidant status in people with type 2 diabetes; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Hossein Mirmiranpour; Hasan Fallah Huseini; Hoda Derakhshanian; Zohreh Khodaii; Bahareh Tavakoli-Far
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-12-23

4.  Rapid evolution of silver nanoparticle resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Joseph L Graves; Mehrdad Tajkarimi; Quincy Cunningham; Adero Campbell; Herve Nonga; Scott H Harrison; Jeffrey E Barrick
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Shiga (Vero)-toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from the hospital foods; virulence factors, o-serogroups and antimicrobial resistance properties.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Mojtaba Masoudimanesh; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Nematollah Jonaidi-Jafari; Ebrahim Rahimi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the Urine Samples of Iranian Dogs: Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern and Distribution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes.

Authors:  Amirhossein Yousefi; Saam Torkan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Detection and drug resistance profile of Escherichia coli from subclinical mastitis cows and water supply in dairy farms in Saraburi Province, Thailand.

Authors:  Woranich Hinthong; Natapol Pumipuntu; Sirijan Santajit; Suphang Kulpeanprasit; Shutipen Buranasinsup; Nitat Sookrung; Wanpen Chaicumpa; Pisinee Aiumurai; Nitaya Indrawattana
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Prevalence, identification of virulence factors, O-serogroups and antibiotic resistance properties of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from raw milk and traditional dairy products.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Mohammad Hossein Sakhaei Shahreza; Ebrahim Rahimi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  Genotyping and distribution of putative virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes of Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from raw meat.

Authors:  Marziyeh Tavakol; Hassan Momtaz; Parviz Mohajeri; Leili Shokoohizadeh; Elahe Tajbakhsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  Phenotypic analysis of antibiotic resistance and genotypic study of the vacA, cagA, iceA, oipA and babA genotypes of the Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from raw milk.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Farid Yadollahi Farsani; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.