Literature DB >> 31823555

[Analysis of influence factor for the failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Jian Wang1, Haijun Wang1, Lin Lin1, Jiakuo Yu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of gender, age, activity level, and diameter of graft on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Between February 2012 and June 2017, 179 cases (111 males and 68 females) with an average age of 30.0 years (range, 11-63 years) were included in study. The patients underwent internal fixator removal at 2 years or more after single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. All patients were sports injuries. The time from injury to operation ranged from 3 days to 26 years (median, 120 days). Lachman test and pivot shift test were positive. Univariate analysis was conducted on gender, age, post-operative activity level (Tegner score at the time of internal fixator removal), diameter of graft, and number of graft strands, and logistic regression was used to conduct multivariate analysis to screen the independent risk factors.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up 24-90 months (mean, 29.1 months). At last follow-up, Lachman test was positive in 25 cases and pivot shift test was positive in 28 cases. The KT-2000 side-to-side difference was -1-7 mm (mean, 1.89 mm). Eleven patients (6.15%) failed after ACL reconstruction. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the age, gender, post-operative activity level, diameter of graft, and number of graft strands were not risk factors for the failure of ACL reconstruction (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the risk for ACL reconstruction failure among age, gender, and activity level. ACL reconstruction failure rate cannot be reduced by increasing the number of graft strands to increase the diameter of grafts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; influence factor; ligament reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823555      PMCID: PMC8355801          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  16 in total

1.  Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques.

Authors:  D L Hamner; C H Brown; M E Steiner; A T Hecker; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  T W Wilson; M P Zafuta; M Zobitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; J Todd R Lawrence; Ryenn L West; Alison P Toth; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Five-Strand versus Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Graft Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Eric R Vaillant; Brent G Parks; Lyn M Camire; Richard Y Hinton
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Park; Hoon Oh; Sua Park; Jung Hwan Lee; Sang Hak Lee; Kyoung Ho Yoon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.

Authors:  Thorkell Snaebjörnsson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi R Ayeni; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ferid Krupic; Fredrik Norberg; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Przemyslaw M Kamien; Josie M Hydrick; William H Replogle; Linda T Go; Gene R Barrett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; David C Flanigan; Joshua Mitchell; Angela D Pedroza; Morgan H Jones; Jack T Andrish; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  A Biomechanical Comparison of 4-Strand and 5-Strand Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Constructs.

Authors:  Matthew L Broadhead; Animesh A Singla; Nicky Bertollo; David Broe; William R Walsh
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 10.  Five-Strand Hamstring Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John-Rudolph H Smith; Darby A Houck; Jessica A Hart; Armando F Vidal; Rachel M Frank; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Clinical study on reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with platelet rich plasma combined with 3-strand peroneus longus tendons].

Authors:  Shichun Wu; Wenxiang Lin; Weihua Xu; Honghan Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.