Literature DB >> 28460194

Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.

Thorkell Snaebjörnsson1,2, Eric Hamrin Senorski1, Olufemi R Ayeni3, Eduard Alentorn-Geli4,5,6, Ferid Krupic2, Fredrik Norberg2, Jón Karlsson1,2, Kristian Samuelsson1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is an effective and widespread method. Recent studies have identified a relationship between the graft diameter and revision ACLR.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the graft diameter on revision ACLR and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing primary ACLR using HT autografts. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register (SNKLR) involving all patients undergoing primary ACLR using HT autografts. Patients with graft failure who needed revision surgery (cases) were compared with patients not undergoing revision surgery (controls). The control group was matched for sex, age, and graft fixation method in a 3:1 ratio. Conditional logistic regression was performed to produce odds ratios and 95% CIs. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed for patient-related outcomes. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) values were obtained.
RESULTS: A total of 2240 patients were included in which there were 560 cases and 1680 controls. No significant differences between the cases and controls were found for sex (52.9% male), mean age (21.7 years), and femoral and tibial fixation. The mean graft diameter for the cases was 8.0 ± 0.74 mm and for the controls was 8.1 ± 0.76 mm. In the present cohort, the likelihood of revision surgery for every 0.5-mm increase in the HT autograft diameter between 7.0 and 10.0 mm was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .03). Univariate linear regression analysis found no significant regression coefficient for the change in KOOS or EQ-5D values.
CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients after primary ACLR with HT autografts, an increase in the graft diameter between 7.0 and 10.0 mm resulted in a 0.86 times lower likelihood of revision surgery with every 0.5-mm increase. This study provides further evidence of the importance of the HT autograft size in intraoperative decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; autografts; failure; graft diameter; graft survival; hamstring tendon autograft; sports medicine; surgical revision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460194     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517704177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  36 in total

1.  Femoral-tibial fixation affects risk of revision and reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Lindsey M Spragg; Heather A Prentice; Andrew Morris; Tadashi T Funahashi; Gregory B Maletis; Rick P Csintalan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Small hamstring autograft is defined by a cut-off diameter of 7 mm and not recommended with allograft augmentation in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Huijun Kang; Conglei Dong; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Alternative Graft Preparations for All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Meghan W Richardson; Nicholas D Tsouris; Chaudry R Hassan; Justen H Elbayar; Yi-Xian Qin; David E Komatsu; Angelo V Rizzi; James M Paci
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation.

Authors:  Mia S Hagen; Woody Sorey; Ermyas Kahsai; Scott Telfer; Kenneth Chin; Christopher Y Kweon; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-24

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Sizing Tools Can Be Interchanged Without Affecting Graft Diameter Measurement.

Authors:  Maude Joannette Bourguignon; Sonia Bédard; Frédéric Balg; Karina Lebel; Alexandre Keith Leang; François Vézina
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  [Analysis of influence factor for the failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Jian Wang; Haijun Wang; Lin Lin; Jiakuo Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-15

9.  Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Remnant Muscle Preservation on Hamstring Tendon Autograft During ACL Reconstruction Promotes Volumetric Increase With Biological and Regenerative Potential.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Z Funchal; Rafael Ortiz; Andrew Jimenez; Gabriella Di Giunta Funchal; Moises Cohen; Diego Costa Astur
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.