Literature DB >> 22305299

Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Robert A Magnussen1, J Todd R Lawrence, Ryenn L West, Alison P Toth, Dean C Taylor, William E Garrett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether decreased hamstring autograft size and decreased patient age are predictors of early graft revision.
METHODS: Of 338 consecutive patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft, 256 (75.7%) were evaluated. Graft size and patient age, gender, and body mass index at the time of ACL reconstruction were recorded, along with whether subsequent ACL revision was performed.
RESULTS: The 256 patients comprised 136 male and 120 female patients and ranged in age from 11 to 52 years (mean, 25.0 years). The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 6 to 47 months). Revision ACL reconstruction was performed in 18 of 256 patients (7.0%) at a mean of 12 months after surgery (range, 3 to 31 months). Revision was performed in 1 of 58 patients (1.7%) with grafts greater than 8 mm in diameter, 9 of 139 patients (6.5%) with 7.5- or 8-mm-diameter grafts, and 8 of 59 patients (13.6%) with grafts 7 mm or less in diameter (P = .027). There was 1 revision performed in the 137 patients aged 20 years or older (0.7%), but 17 revisions were performed in the 119 patients aged under 20 years (14.3%) (P < .0001). Most revisions (16 of 18) were noted to occur in patients aged under 20 years with grafts 8 mm in diameter or less, and the revision rate in this population was 16.4% (16 of 97 patients). Age less than 20 years at reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 18.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43 to 147.06; P = .005), decreased graft size (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.85; P = .05), and increased follow-up time (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.12) were associated with increased risk of revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreased hamstring autograft size and decreased patient age are predictors of early graft revision. Use of hamstring autografts 8 mm in diameter or less in patients aged under 20 years is associated with higher revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22305299     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  154 in total

1.  Prediction of Autograft Hamstring Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using MRI.

Authors:  Katharine Hollnagel; Brent M Johnson; Kelley K Whitmer; Andrew Hanna; Thomas K Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft link: graft preparation technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-08-31

Review 4.  The concept of individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; B Muller; C D Murawski; C F van Eck; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC AND SURGERY-SPECIFIC FACTORS THAT AFFECT RETURN TO SPORT AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Rick Joreitz; Andrew Lynch; Stephen Rabuck; Brittany Lynch; Sarah Davin; James Irrgang
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

6.  The 5-strand hamstring graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Rushyuan Jay Lee; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-10-20

7.  Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Chengliang Dai; Fei Wang; Xiaomeng Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Shengjie Wang; Shiyu Tang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Femoral-tibial fixation affects risk of revision and reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Lindsey M Spragg; Heather A Prentice; Andrew Morris; Tadashi T Funahashi; Gregory B Maletis; Rick P Csintalan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Marchand; Nicolas Ruiz; Augustin Coupry; Mark Bowen; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Preoperative prediction of anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint size by anthropometric variables.

Authors:  Yong-Beom Park; Chul-Won Ha; Hyung-Joo Kim; Yong-Geun Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.