Literature DB >> 23813800

Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Przemyslaw M Kamien1, Josie M Hydrick, William H Replogle, Linda T Go, Gene R Barrett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient age, Tegner activity level, and graft size could be factors that influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstring autografts. HYPOTHESIS: Decreased graft size, higher Tegner activity score, and younger age are associated with an increased failure rate of ACLR, represented by continued knee laxity and revision surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 98 patients who had undergone ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts between 2000 and 2007 were identified from a computerized relational database. Inclusion criteria consisted of a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, all age groups, and all activity levels. Exclusion criteria consisted of treatment with other grafts or previous ligament surgery, previous ACL repairs, bilateral ACL injuries, and associated ligament tears. Failure was defined as a 2+ Lachman result, positive pivot shift, and 5-mm difference or more on KT-1000 arthrometer measurement.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 98 ACLRs (15.3%) were defined as failures. Of the failures, 12 of 48 (25%) occurred in patients aged 25 years and younger, whereas 3 of 50 (6%) occurred in patients older than 25 years. There was a statistically significant association when comparing failure rate and age groups (P = .009); however, a significant association was not found between graft size and failure rate in the entire study population (P = .135) or within the different age groups (age ≤25 years vs. >25 years) based on failure rate (P = .390 and P = .165, respectively). No statistical significance was found when Tegner activity level and failure rate were compared in the overall study population (P = .463) or within age groups (≤25 years, P = .707; >25 years, P = .174).
CONCLUSION: In this study population, younger patients (≤25 years) demonstrated a higher failure rate compared with the over-25 age group. A statistically significant difference was not found in terms of graft size and activity level correlating with failure rate in ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; age; graft size; hamstring autograft

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813800     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513493896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  52 in total

1.  Incidence and Predictors of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Primary Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Prevention and Management of Post-operative Complications Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian J Eckenrode; James L Carey; Brian J Sennett; Miltiadis H Zgonis
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

3.  Arthroscopic centralization restores residual knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knee with a lateral meniscus defect.

Authors:  Tomomasa Nakamura; Monica A Linde; Brandon D Marshall; Hideyuki Koga; Takeshi Muneta; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The sizing of hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate reconstruction: intra- and inter-observer reliability.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Daniel B Whelan; Amir Khoshbin; David Wasserstein; Andrew Dold; Jaskarndip Chahal; Aaron Nauth; M Lucas Murnaghan; Darrell J Ogilvie-Harris; John S Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Timothy E Hewett; David C Flanigan; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488 Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Registry: 2-Year Outcomes Suggest Low Revision and Return to OR Rates.

Authors:  Moira McCarthy; Katherine Mallett; Matthew Abola; Sherrie Vassallo; Joseph Nguyen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-11-22

9.  Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Marchand; Nicolas Ruiz; Augustin Coupry; Mark Bowen; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A Novel Mass-Spring-Damper Model Analysis to Identify Landing Deficits in Athletes Returning to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Schneider; Alli Gokeler; Egbert Otten; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Jon G Divine; Angelo J Colosimo; Robert S Heidt; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.