| Literature DB >> 31817585 |
Yafen Song1, Yong Zhang1, Ling Chen1, Bing Zhang1, Min Zhang1, Jingwen Wang1, Ying Jiang1, Chenghuai Yang1, Taozhen Jiang1.
Abstract
H9N2 avian influenza is a remarkable disease that has circulated in domestic poultry in large regions of China and posed a serious threat to the poultry industry. The H9N2 virus can not only infect mammals directly, but also provide gene segments to generate novel, but lethal human reassortants. Therefore, it is important to study the evolution, pathogenicity, and transmission of the H9N2 virus. In this study, three H9N2 viruses isolated from chickens in different layer farms were identified. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these H9N2 viruses were all multiple genotype reassortants, with genes originating from Y280-like, F/98-like, and G1-like viruses. Animal studies indicated that the AV1535 and AV1548 viruses replicated efficiently in the lungs, tracheas, spleens, kidneys, and brains of chickens; the viruses shed for at least 11 days post-inoculation (DPI) and were transmitted efficiently among contact chickens. The AV1534 virus replicated poorly in chickens, shed for 7 DPI, and were not transmitted efficiently among contact chickens. The AV1534 virus replicated well in mice lungs and caused about 2% weight loss. The AV1535 and AV1548 viruses were not able to replicate in the lungs of mice. Our results indicate that we should pay attention to H9N2 avian influenza virus surveillance in poultry and changes in the pathogenicity of them to mammals.Entities:
Keywords: H9N2; avian influenza virus; chicken; mice; pathogenicity; phylogenetic analysis; transmission
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817585 PMCID: PMC6950319 DOI: 10.3390/v11121127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees of the (A) hemagglutinin (HA), (B) neuraminidase (NA), (C) polymerase basic subunit 2 (PB2), (D) polymerase basic subunit 1 (PB1), (E) polymerase acidic subunit (PA), (F) nucleoprotein (NP), (G) matrix (M), and (H) nonstructural (NS) genes of H9N2 influenza viruses. The trees were generated by the neighbor-joining method of the MEGA 4.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The isolated viruses in this study were marked with a black triangle “▲”.
Figure 2Genetic reassortants of the three H9N2 avian influenza viruses. The eight gene segments of the three H9N2 viruses, represented by horizontal bars are, from top to bottom, PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, M, and NS. Each different color represents a distinct origin.
Influenza viruses with the highest nucleotide homology to each gene of three H9N2 viruses, as determined by BLAST search in the GenBank.
| Strains | Gene a | Closest Viruses in GenBank | Homology (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A/chicken/Shandong/AV1534/2011(H9N2) | HA | A/Chicken/Tianjin/2009(H9N2) | 97.9 |
| NA | A/Chicken/Tianjin/2009(H9N2) | 99.8 | |
| PB2 | A/chicken/Shandong/Li-2/2010(H9N2) | 98.7 | |
| PB1 | A/chicken/Shandong/01/2009(H9N2) | 98.9 | |
| PA | A/chicken/Henan/13/2008(H9N2) | 98.8 | |
| NP | A/chicken/Shandong/zc2/2009(H9N2) | 99.3 | |
| M | A/chicken/Shandong/02/2008(H9N2) | 99.9 | |
| NS | A/swine/Taizhou/5/2008(H9N2) | 99.5 | |
| A/chicken/Shandong/AV1535/2011(H9N2) | HA | A/chicken/Anhui/LJT/2010(H9N2) | 99.1 |
| NA | A/chicken/Beijing/HD/2010(H9N2) | 98.3 | |
| PB2 | A/chicken/Anhui/HF/2010(H9N2) | 98.9 | |
| PB1 | A/Duck/Fujian/1753/2009(H9N2) | 99.2 | |
| PA | A/chicken/Shanghai/96/2009(H9N2) | 98.5 | |
| NP | A/Duck/Fujian/1753/2009(H9N2) | 98.9 | |
| M | A/chicken/Shandong/10/2010(H9N2) | 99.3 | |
| NS | A/chicken/Jiangsu/Q3/2010(H9N2) | 99.4 | |
| A/chicken/Shandong/AV1548/2011(H9N2) | HA | A/chicken/Shandong/H/2009(H9N2) | 99.6 |
| NA | A/chicken/Shandong/HL/2010(H9N2) | 99.4 | |
| PB2 | A/chicken/Anhui/HF/2010(H9N2) | 99.1 | |
| PB1 | A/chicken/Hunan/2237/2010(H9N2) | 99.1 | |
| PA | A/chicken/Guangdong/1683/2009(H9N2) | 99.1 | |
| NP | A/chicken/Shandong/LY/2008(H9N2) | 98.6 | |
| M | A/chicken/Beijing/HD/2010(H9N2) | 99.6 | |
| NS | A/chicken/Jiangsu/Q3/2010(H9N2) | 99.5 |
a PB, polymerase basic subunit; PA, polymerase acidic subunit; HA, hemagglutinin; NP, nucleoprotein; NA, neuraminidase; M, matrix; NS, nonstructural.
Figure 3Molecular analysis of the HA1 amino acid sequences of the three H9N2 avian influenza viruses and reference viruses. Potential N-glycosylation sites (PGS) were marked with a green shade. Pentagram indicates the previously defined receptor-binding sites (RBS). The right edge of the binding pocket (128–132) and the left edge of the binding pocket (214–219) are marked with a blue shade. A red shade represents the cleavage site.
Replication in the chickens of the three H9N2 virus after being inoculated intranasally a.
| Strains | Virus Replication on Three Days Post-Inoculation (DPI) (log10EID50/0.1 mL) b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | Trachea | Spleen | Kidney | Brain | |
| AV1534 | 2.58 ± 1.88 | 2.17 ± 1.16 | 1.67 ± 0.14 | - c | 1.92 ± 0.52 |
| AV1535 | 4.75 ± 1.30 | 3.50 ± 0 | 2.83 ± 0.58 | 2.25 ± 0.66 | 2.25 ± 0.66 |
| AV1548 | 5.42 ± 0.14 | 3.50 ± 0 | 2.17 ± 1.16 | 2.83 ± 0.95 | 1.75 ± 0.43 |
a Six-week-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were inoculated intranasally (i.n.) with 106EID50 of the AV1534, AV1535, and AV1548 viruses in a volume of 0.2 mL; three chickens were chosen for virus titer on 3 DPI in each group, and the lungs, trachea, spleen, kidneys, and brain of the three chosen chickens were collected for virus titer in eggs. b A value of 1.5 was assigned if the virus was not detected from the undiluted sample in three embryonated chicken eggs. Virus titers are expressed as means ± standard deviation in log10EID50/0.1 mL of tissue. c Not detected.
Virus titers in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from chickens.
| viruses | Virus Shedding and Mean Infectivity Titer on the Days Post-Inoculation (log10EID50/0.1 mL ± SD a) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Day | 3 Days | 5 Days | 7 Days | 9 Days | 11 Days | 13 Days | |||||||||
| O b | C c | O | C | O | C | O | C | O | C | O | C | O | C | ||
| AV1534 | infected | 4.13 ± 0.41 (6/6) | 1.83 ± 0.44 (3/6) | 4.33 ± 0.13 (6/6) | 2.71 ± 0.70 (6/6) | 4.42 ± 0.14 (3/3) | 2.08 ± 0.52 (2/3) | 2.75 ± 0.50 (3/3) | 1.83 ± 0.38 (2/3) | ND d | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| contact | 3.08 ± 0.29 (3/3) | ND | 3.67 ± 0.14 (3/3) | 1.83 ± 0.58 (1/3) | 4.17 ± 0.38 (3/3) | 2.25 ± 0.43 (3/3) | 1.83 ± 0.58 (1/3) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| AV1535 | infected | 3.29 ± 0.29 (6/6) | 1.63 ± 0.31 (1/6) | 3.83 ± 0.59 (6/6) | 2.54 ± 0.60 (6/6) | 3.33 ± 1.04 (3/3) | 2.42 ± 0.88 (2/3) | 2.75 ± 0.43 (3/3) | 2.83 ± 1.16 (2/3) | ND | 2.83 ± 1.16 (2/3) | ND | 2.83 ± 1.16 (2/3) | ND | 2.67 ± 1.01 (2/3) |
| contact | 2.92 ± 0.58 (3/3) | 192 ± 0.72 (1/3) | 3.25 ± 0.75 (3/3) | 1.75 ± 0 (3/3) | 2.25 ± 1.09 (2/3) | 2.83 ± 0.95 (3/3) | 2.42 ± 0.14 (3/3) | 2.42 ± 1.01 (2/3) | ND | 2.17 ± 1.16 (1/3) | ND | 2.17 ± 1.16 (1/3) | ND | 1.58 ± 0.14 (1/3) | |
| AV1548 | infected | 3.67 ± 0.34 (6/6) | 1.58 ± 0.13 (2/6) | 4.42 ± 0.13 (6/6) | 2.25 ± 0.67 (4/6) | 4.50 ± 0 (3/3) | 2.17 ± 0.58 (2/3) | 2.42 ± 0.88 (3/3) | 2.33 ± 0.88 (2/3) | ND | 1.83 ± 0.58 (1/3) | ND | 1.75 ± 0.43 (1/3) | ND | ND |
| contact | 3.50 ± 0 (3/3) | 1.92 ± 0.72 (1/3) | 3.92 ± 0.52 (3/3) | 2.17 ± 0.58 (2/3) | 4.08 ± 0.29 (3/3) | 2.50 ± 0 (3/3) | 3.42 ± 0.14 (3/3) | 2.33 ± 0.14 (3/3) | 2.17 ± 0.58 (2/3) | ND | 1.75 ± 0.43 (1/3) | ND | ND | ND | |
a A value of 1.5 was assigned for calculations if the virus was not detected from the undiluted sample in three embryonated chicken eggs. Virus titers are expressed as mean ± standard deviation in log10EID50/0.1 mL of tissue. b Oropharyngeal swabs. c Cloacal swabs. d Not detected.
Figure 4Replication of the three H9N2 avian influenza viruses in mice. (A) Weight change of BABL/c mouse during the 14 DPI. (B) Six-week-old SPF BALB/c mice were inoculated intranasally with 106EID50 of each virus in a 50 μL volume. Three mice were killed on 1, 2, 3, and 5 DPI, respectively. Lungs were collected for virus titration in eggs. A value of 1.0 was assigned for calculations if the virus was not detected from the undiluted sample in three embryonated chicken eggs. The virus titers were shown as mean ± SD.