| Literature DB >> 29510698 |
Haiyun Jin1,2, Wan Wang1,2, Xueqin Yang1,2, Hailong Su1,2, Jiawen Fan1,2, Rui Zhu1,2, Shifeng Wang3, Huoying Shi4,5, Xiufan Liu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaccines constitute a unique selective pressure, different from natural selection, drives the evolution of influenza virus. In this study, A/Chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 (H9N2) was continually passaged in specific pathogen-free embryonated chicken eggs with or without selective pressures from antibodies induced by homologous maternal antibodies. Genetic mutations, antigenic drift, replication, and pathogenicity of the passaged virus were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Antigenic drift; H9N2 influenza virus; Mutation; Replication; Selective pressure of antibody
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29510698 PMCID: PMC5840701 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1391-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Virus passage process. These images in Fig. 1 were made by authors and permitted to use
Isolation of H9N2 viruses in vaccinated chickens after challenged with the passaged viruses
| Group | Challenge virus | HI mean titer(2n) | 3dpi | 5dpi | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Homologous antigen 2n) | Tracheal swaba (Virus titers b) | Cloacal swaba (Virus titersb) | Tracheal swaba (Virus titers b) | Cloacal swaba (Virus titers b) | ||
| A (None-immune) | BSG | 0 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
| F/98 | 0 | 6/6 (3.2 ± 0.3) | 1/6 (1.6 ± 0.1) | 3/6 (1.8 ± 0.2) | 0/6 | |
| nF47 | 0 | 6/6 (5.2 ± 0.1) | 6/6 (3.1 ± 0.3) | 2/6 (3.2 ± 0.1) | 2/6 (1.1 ± 0.1) | |
| vF47 | 0 | 6/6(4.1 ± 0.2) | 3/6 (2.1 ± 0.1) | 6/6 (1.5 ± 0.3) | 2/6 (<1C) | |
| nF52 | 0 | 6/6 (3.6 ± 0.1) | 2/6 (3.8 ± 0.2) | 6/6 (4.1 ± 0.2) | 2/6 (1.6 ± 0.3) | |
| B (Immune F/98) | F/98 | 7 | 1/6 (1.2 ± 0.1) | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
| nF47 | 7 | 1/6(3.1 ± 0.1) | 0/6 | 2/6 (1.3 ± 0.3) | 0/6 | |
| vF47 | 7.3 | 6/6 (4.3 ± 0.1) | 4/6 (2.2 ± 0.2) | 6/6 (2.7 ± 0.2) | 5/6 (1.0 ± 0.2) | |
| nF52 | 7 | 6/6 (3.9 ± 0.3) | 2/6 (1.6 ± 0.1) | 6/6 (2.1 ± 0.1) | 3/6 (<1C) | |
| C (immune nF47) | F | 7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
| nF47 | 7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | |
| D (immune vF47) | F | 6.7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
| vF47 | 6.7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | |
| E (immune nF52) | F | 7 | 1/6(1.9 ± 0.3) | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
| nF52 | 7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | |
anumber of positive tracheal or cloacal swabs /total number of chickens
bVirus titers in tracheal or cloacal swabs are expressed as mean log10 EID50/ml ± SD
cLower than the detection limit of 10 EID50
Adaptation of H9N2 avian influenza virus in SPF embryonated chicken eggs with or without SPA
| Characters | F/98 | nF47 | nF52 | vF47 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HI titer | 512 | 256 | 16 | 16 |
| Change in HI titer compare to F/98 | 2-fold | 32-fold | 32-fold | |
| EMDT (h)a | 86 | 79 | 68.5 | 75 |
| Change in EMDT(h)compare to F/98 | 7 | 17.5 | 11 | |
| EID50 (log10 EID50/0.2 ml) | 6.67 | 7.64 | 8.74 | 7.77 |
| Changed in EID50 compare to F/98 (log10 decrease) | 9.3-fold** | 117.5-fold**## | 12.5 fold** | |
| Mutationsb compare to F/98 (start-end passage of mutant) | PB2: S155 N, C228Y, K375R (nF46-nF80) | PB2:S155 N, C228Y, K375R (nF46-nF80) | PB2: I185K, C228Y, K375R (vF43-vF80) | |
| PB1: none | PB1:T156A, R189K (nF49-nF80) | PB1: none | ||
| PA: none | PA: none | PA: none | ||
| HA: K131R (nF30) | HA: K131R(nF30-nF80), S145 N, G181E, A198V (nF52-nF80) | HA: | ||
| NP: none | NP: R99K (nF50-nF80) | NP: none | ||
| NA: none | NA: A459T (nF52-nF80) | NA: none | ||
| M: none | M: none | M: none | ||
| NS1: none | NS1: A143T (nF50-nF80) | NS1: none |
aEMDT: Embryo mean death time
beach gene represent results from 10 clones
**P < 0.01 for the 50% egg infectious dose of nF47, vF47, and nF52 was significantly higher than that of their parental virus F/98
##P < 0.01 for the 50% egg infectious dose of nF52 was significantly higher than that of nF47 and vF47
Fig. 2Mutants mapping of HA. Schematic representation of monomer structures of the H9 haemagglutinin molecule showing the locations of amino acid substitutions on HA1. Amino acid changes of escape mutants selected with or without homologous vaccine antibody against Ck/SH/F/98 (H9N2). The positions of the mutations sites are shown as yellow for 131 site, green for 145 site, apricot yellow for 181 site, and blue for 198 site. Red for receptor binding pocket of HA1 in H9 virus. Amino acid positions correspond to H9 numbering. Images were created with RasMol 2.7.3
Fig. 3Replication and pathological changes of the viruses in chickens. Groups of three chickens were inoculated orally, intranasally, and intratracheally with 106 EID50 of F/98 or the passaged viruses. a-b Replication ability of the viruses in trachea and lung of chickens were evaluated at 3 and 5 dpi. For virus titration in SPF eggs. The average of each group is shown, with error bars representing the SD. **, P < 0.01 compared with the value for the parental virus F/98 group; ##, P < 0.01 for the passaged viruses group compared each other. Data are representative of three independent experiments. c-d Histology scores of viruses in the trachea (c) and lung (d) chickens at 3 and 5 days after inoculated with H9N2 virus. Horizontal lines show the mean, error bars represent the SD, and data are representative of three independent experiments. e-l Representative H&E histology sections of the viruses at 5 d after inoculated with different virus. e-f F/98 virus-infected trachea and lung; g-h nF47 virus-infected trachea and lung; i-j vF47 virus-infected trachea and lung; k-l nF52 virus-infected trachea and lung. The histopathological changes were scored as follows. For trachea, 0: normal; 1: congestion; 2: cilia loss; 3: a few inflammatory cell infiltration; 7: a lot of inflammatory cell infiltration; for lung, 0: normal; 1: congestion; 2: hemorrhage; 3: inflammatory cell infiltration in bronchial submucosa; 7: a lot of inflammatory cell infiltration in bronchial submucosa and alveolus
Isolation for H9N2 viruses of tracheal and cloacal swabs in chickens in transmission experiment
| Virus | Ways of infection | Tracheal swabs (virus titersb) | Cloacal swabs (virus titersb) | Mean HI titers of chickens (2n) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 5 d | 7 d | 9 d | 3 d | 5 d | 7 d | 9 d | 10 d | 20 d | ||
| F/98 | Directly inoculationa | 9/9(3.3 ± 0.2) | 6/9(1.85 ± 0.2) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/9(1.65 ± 0.1) | 6/9(1.8 ± 0.4) | 3/9(<1c) | 5 ± 0.7 | 9 ± 0.5 |
| Airborne contacta | 2/9(1.7 ± 0.1) | 4/9(<1c) | 2/9(<1c) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 4/9(1.1 ± 0.1) | 2/9(<1c) | 0/9 | 3 ± 1.9 | 9 ± 0.3 | |
| nF47 | Directly inoculationa | 9/9(5.3 ± 0.4) | 9/9(3.45 ± 0.3) | 9/9(1.65 ± 0.2) | 6/9(<1c) | 0/9 | 4/9(2.4 ± 0.3) | 7/9(1.3 ± 0.1) | 3/9(<1c) | 6 ± 0.4 | 10 ± 0.2 |
| Airborne contacta | 5/9(3.5 ± 0.1) | 7/9(2.5 ± 0.3) | 2/9(<1c) | 2/9(<1c) | 0/9 | 3/9(1.6 ± 0.2) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 7 ± 1.5 | 9 ± 2.9 | |
| VF47 | Directly inoculationa | 9/9(4.2 ± 0.3) | 9/9(2.5 ± 0.3) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/3(2.45 ± 0.3) | 7/9(1.5 ± 0.1) | 2/9(1.15 ± 0. 2) | 7 ± 0.2 | 10 ± 0.6 |
| Airborne contacta | 5/9(2.2 ± 0.4) | 7/9(1.2 ± 0.1) | 6/9(<1c) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 3/9(1.9 ± 0.1) | 7/9(1.1 ± 0.5) | 3/9(<1c) | 7 ± 2.6 | 10 ± 1.1 | |
| nF52 | Directly inoculationa | 9/9(3.8 ± 0.2) | 9/9(4.1 ± 0.2) | 6/9(2.6 ± 0.1) | 0/9 | 0/9 | 4/9(2.9 ± 0.3) | 6/9(2.2 ± 0.3) | 3/9(<1c) | 7 ± 0.8 | 10 ± 1.7 |
| Airborne contacta | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0/9 | 0 | 0 | |
anumber of positive tracheal or cloacal/total number of chickens
bVirus titers in tracheal or cloacal swabs are expressed as mean log10 EID50/ml ± SD
cLower than the detection limit of 10 EID50