Literature DB >> 32153104

Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

John Doane1, Michael Flynn1, Marcus Archibald1, Dominick Ramirez1, Molly B Conroy1, Barry Stults1.   

Abstract

Unattended automated office blood pressure (BP) measurement (u-AOBP) improves office BP measurement accuracy and reduces white-coat BP elevation, but there are reservations about its time efficiency in primary care. We used time-stamp methodology to measure u-AOBP procedure times performed without a rest period in 130 patients during routine clinic visits to three primary care clinics with 2.5-4.9 years u-AOBP experience. We documented the clinical activities of 30 medical assistants during the u-AOBP procedures. We also assessed MA and clinician satisfaction and knowledge about u-AOBP performance and interpretation. Median u-AOBP procedure time was <5 minutes, and MAs engaged in productive clinical activities during 83% of the procedures. Ninety-three percent of MAs and 100% of clinicians in the clinics agreed that u-AOBP is an efficient method to improve hypertension management. Barriers to effective u-AOBP implementation and ongoing utilization included initial difficulty incorporating u-AOBP into clinic workflow and medical staff knowledge deficiencies concerning correct u-AOBP performance and interpretation despite prior training and experience with the procedure. Intensive u-AOBP education and training programs are needed to facilitate effective u-AOBP implementation into primary care. The time required to perform u-AOBP can be utilized productively by staff.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertension; unattended automated office blood pressure (u-AOBP)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32153104      PMCID: PMC8030085          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  37 in total

1.  Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comparison of Automated Office Blood Pressure With Office and Out-Off-Office Measurement Techniques.

Authors:  Marco Pappaccogli; Silvia Di Monaco; Elisa Perlo; Jacopo Burrello; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Franco Veglio; Silvia Monticone; Franco Rabbia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Identification of the Optimal Protocol for Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients With Treated Hypertension.

Authors:  Myles N Moore; Martin G Schultz; Mark R Nelson; J Andrew Black; Nathan B Dwyer; Ella Hoban; Matthew D Jose; Wojciech Kosmala; Monika Przewlocka-Kosmala; Jowita Zachwyc; Petr Otahal; Dean S Picone; Philip Roberts-Thomson; Panagiota Veloudi; James E Sharman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Unattended Versus Attended Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Massimo Salvetti; Anna Paini; Carlo Aggiusti; Fabio Bertacchini; Deborah Stassaldi; Sara Capellini; Carolina De Ciuceis; Damiano Rizzoni; Roberto Gatta; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Maria Lorenza Muiesan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Response to: Does AOBP require a 5-minute rest period to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Kathryn A Carson; Jill A Marsteller; Katherine B Dietz; Gary J Noronha; Yea-Jen Hsu; Sarah J Flynn; Jeanne M Charleston; Greg P Prokopowicz; Edgar R Miller; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Pay (adequately) for what works: the economic undervaluation of office and ambulatory blood pressure recordings.

Authors:  Thomas D Giles; Peter Egan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Attended automated office blood pressure re-visited.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.