Literature DB >> 31759929

Deep-Learning System Detects Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus With Higher Accuracy Than Endoscopists in a Multistep Training and Validation Study With Benchmarking.

Albert J de Groof1, Maarten R Struyvenberg1, Joost van der Putten2, Fons van der Sommen2, Kiki N Fockens1, Wouter L Curvers3, Sveta Zinger2, Roos E Pouw1, Emmanuel Coron4, Francisco Baldaque-Silva5, Oliver Pech6, Bas Weusten7, Alexander Meining8, Horst Neuhaus9, Raf Bisschops10, John Dent11, Erik J Schoon3, Peter H de With2, Jacques J Bergman12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning computer-aided detection (CAD) system, suitable for use in real time in clinical practice, to improve endoscopic detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE).
METHODS: We developed a hybrid ResNet-UNet model CAD system using 5 independent endoscopy data sets. We performed pretraining using 494,364 labeled endoscopic images collected from all intestinal segments. Then, we used 1704 unique esophageal high-resolution images of rigorously confirmed early-stage neoplasia in BE and nondysplastic BE, derived from 669 patients. System performance was assessed by using data sets 4 and 5. Data set 5 was also scored by 53 general endoscopists with a wide range of experience from 4 countries to benchmark CAD system performance. Coupled with histopathology findings, scoring of images that contained early-stage neoplasia in data sets 2-5 were delineated in detail for neoplasm position and extent by multiple experts whose evaluations served as the ground truth for segmentation.
RESULTS: The CAD system classified images as containing neoplasms or nondysplastic BE with 89% accuracy, 90% sensitivity, and 88% specificity (data set 4, 80 patients and images). In data set 5 (80 patients and images) values for the CAD system vs those of the general endoscopists were 88% vs 73% accuracy, 93% vs 72% sensitivity, and 83% vs 74% specificity. The CAD system achieved higher accuracy than any of the individual 53 nonexpert endoscopists, with comparable delineation performance. CAD delineations of the area of neoplasm overlapped with those from the BE experts in all detected neoplasia in data sets 4 and 5. The CAD system identified the optimal site for biopsy of detected neoplasia in 97% and 92% of cases (data sets 4 and 5, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed, validated, and benchmarked a deep-learning computer-aided system for primary detection of neoplasia in patients with BE. The system detected neoplasia with high accuracy and near-perfect delineation performance. The Netherlands National Trials Registry, Number: NTR7072.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett surveillance; artificial intelligence; esophageal cancer; machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31759929     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  45 in total

Review 1.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Deep-learning AI for neoplasia detection in Barrett oesophagus.

Authors:  Iain Dickson
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 4.  Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom… In Barrett's Surveillance.

Authors:  Pauline A Zellenrath; Carlijn A M Roumans; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Identifying Esophageal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Taseen Syed; Akash Doshi; Shan Guleria; Sana Syed; Tilak Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  What is the optimal surveillance strategy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  Ying Gibbens; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A Gratifying Step forward for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Yulin Tan; Yibo Wang; Jie Gao; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.