Literature DB >> 34559310

Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Takashi Sakamoto1,2, Tadahiro Goto3,4, Michimasa Fujiogi5,6, Alan Kawarai Lefor7.   

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is a collection of algorithms allowing computers to learn directly from data without predetermined equations. It is used widely to analyze "big data". In gastrointestinal surgery, surgeons deal with various data such as clinical parameters, surgical videos, and pathological images, to stratify surgical risk, perform safe surgery and predict patient prognosis. In the current "big data" era, the accelerating accumulation of a large amount of data drives studies using ML algorithms. Three subfields of ML are supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. In this review, we summarize applications of ML to surgical practice in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care. Prediction and stratification using ML is promising; however, the current overarching concern is the availability of ML models. Information systems that can manage "big data" and integrate ML models into electronic health records are essential to incorporate ML into daily practice. ML is fundamental technology to meaningfully process data that exceeds the capacity of the human mind to comprehend. The accelerating accumulation of a large amount of data is changing the nature of surgical practice fundamentally. Artificial intelligence (AI), represented by ML, is being incorporated into daily surgical practice.
© 2021. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Computer-assisted surgery; Deep learning; Gastrointestinal surgery; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34559310     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02380-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  69 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Jeffrey Dean; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Jason N Kennedy; Shu Wang; Chung-Chou H Chang; Corrine F Elliott; Zhongying Xu; Scott Berry; Gilles Clermont; Gregory Cooper; Hernando Gomez; David T Huang; John A Kellum; Qi Mi; Steven M Opal; Victor Talisa; Tom van der Poll; Shyam Visweswaran; Yoram Vodovotz; Jeremy C Weiss; Donald M Yealy; Sachin Yende; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Alfred Rademaker; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Predictive Utility of a Machine Learning Algorithm in Estimating Mortality Risk in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Arman Kilic; Anshul Goyal; James K Miller; Eva Gjekmarkaj; Weng Lam Tam; Thomas G Gleason; Ibrahim Sultan; Artur Dubrawksi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP Online Risk Calculator Depends on How You Look at It: Results from the United States Gastric Cancer Collaborative.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Neil D Saunders; Joseph F Kearney; Ezra Lyon; Lai Wei; Malcom H Squires; Linda X Jin; David J Worhunsky; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Aslam Ejaz; George Poultsides; Ryan C Fields; Douglas Swords; Alexandra W Acher; Sharon M Weber; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy Pawlik; Carl R Schmidt
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 9.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Automated Performance Metrics and Machine Learning Algorithms to Measure Surgeon Performance and Anticipate Clinical Outcomes in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jian Chen; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Lyu; Yu Wang; Qing-Xiang Meng; Ping-Ming Fan; Ke Ma; Sha Xiao; Xun-Chen Cao; Guang-Xun Lin; Si-Yuan Dong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.