Literature DB >> 33737800

What is the optimal surveillance strategy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus?

Ying Gibbens1, Prasad G Iyer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is conflicting data on the effectiveness of the currently recommended endoscopic surveillance strategy in non-dysplastic BE patients. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the (cost) effectiveness of the current surveillance strategy. We also reviewed critical strategies and new technologies which could improve dysplasia detection. RECENT
FINDINGS: Adherence to the current EGD surveillance guidelines is suboptimal with high rates of missed dysplasia/EAC. The influence of surveillance on EAC mortality appears modest. Careful cleansing, inspection and sampling of the BE mucosa using high resolution while light and (electronic) chromoendoscopy is critical. Newer sampling techniques coupled with computer aided diagnosis and emerging imaging technologies have shown promise in improving dysplasia detection. Personalized surveillance with risk stratification based on risk factors for progression may be on the horizon.
SUMMARY: Current BE surveillance strategy will likely be further refined and optimized by emerging new technologies in tissue sampling, advanced imaging and risk stratification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; artificial intelligence; cancer progression; endoscopic surveillance; esophageal adenocarcinoma; risk stratification

Year:  2020        PMID: 33737800      PMCID: PMC7963123          DOI: 10.1007/s11938-020-00297-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  57 in total

1.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus: Is It Cost-Effective?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Diagnosis by endoscopy and advanced imaging.

Authors:  A Swager; W L Curvers; J J Bergman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 4.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Use of Appropriate Surveillance for Patients With Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Anna Tavakkoli; Henry D Appelman; David G Beer; Chaitra Madiyal; Maryam Khodadost; Kimberly Nofz; Val Metko; Grace Elta; Thomas Wang; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tusar K Desai; Kumar Krishnan; Niharika Samala; Jashanpreet Singh; John Cluley; Subaiah Perla; Colin W Howden
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Directional distribution of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus is not influenced by distance from the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Lisa Cassani; Eric Sumner; James C Slaughter; Patrick Yachimski
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Endoscopy in the Elderly: a Cautionary Approach, When to Stop.

Authors:  Rita Abdelmessih; Christopher D Packey; Garrett Lawlor
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09

Review 9.  The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Don Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Siddharth Singh; Sachin Wani; Nicholas J Shaheen; John M Inadomi; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Factors Associated With Progression of Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Siddharth Singh; Karthik Ragunathan; Kavel Visrodia; Kenneth K Wang; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.