Literature DB >> 35814973

Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom… In Barrett's Surveillance.

Pauline A Zellenrath1, Carlijn A M Roumans1,2, Manon C W Spaander1.   

Abstract

Background: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma, a malignancy with increasing incidence and poor survival rates. To reduce mortality, regular endoscopic surveillance of BE patients is recommended to detect neoplasia in an (endoscopically) curable stage. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of current BE surveillance strategies, its pitfalls, and potential future directions to optimize BE surveillance. Summary: Several societal guidelines provide surveillance strategies. However, when practicing those endoscopies multiple drawbacks are encountered. Important challenges are time-consuming biopsy protocols with low adherence rates, biopsy sampling error, interobserver variability in endoscopic detection of lesions, and interobserver variability in diagnosis of dysplasia. Furthermore, the overall efficacy and cost-effectiveness of surveillance are questioned. Using novel techniques, such as artificial intelligence and personalized surveillance intervals, can help to overcome these obstacles. Key Messages: Currently, there is room for improvement in BE surveillance. Better risk-stratification is expected to reduce both patient and healthcare burdens. Personalized and dynamic surveillance intervals accompanied by novel techniques in detection and histopathological assessment of dysplasia may be tools for a change in the right direction.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's esophagus; Cost-effectiveness; Dysplasia; Risk-stratification; Surveillance

Year:  2022        PMID: 35814973      PMCID: PMC9209968          DOI: 10.1159/000522376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  38 in total

1.  Grading of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: substantial interobserver variation between general and gastrointestinal pathologists.

Authors:  M Kerkhof; H van Dekken; E W Steyerberg; G A Meijer; A H Mulder; A de Bruïne; A Driessen; F J ten Kate; J G Kusters; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Quality of Barrett's surveillance in The Netherlands: a standardized review of endoscopy and pathology reports.

Authors:  Wouter L Curvers; Femke P Peters; Brenda Elzer; Annet J C M Schaap; Lubbertus C Baak; Arnoud van Oijen; Rosalie M Mallant-Hent; Fiebo Ten Kate; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Jacques J G H M Bergman
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Detection of lesions in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus by community and expert endoscopists.

Authors:  Dirk W Schölvinck; Kim van der Meulen; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Bas L A M Weusten
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated.

Authors:  Wouter L Curvers; Fiebo J ten Kate; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Mike Visser; Brenda Elzer; Lubertus C Baak; Clarisse Bohmer; Rosalie C Mallant-Hent; Arnout van Oijen; Anton H Naber; Pieter Scholten; Olivier R Busch; Harriët G T Blaauwgeers; Gerrit A Meijer; Jacques J G H M Bergman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Barrett's oesophagus: epidemiology, cancer risk and implications for management.

Authors:  Pieter Jan F de Jonge; Mark van Blankenstein; William M Grady; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Richard Sampliner; Jesper Lagergren; David Lieberman; A Mark Fendrick; Nimish Vakil
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive cell sampling device ('Cytosponge') in the diagnosis of esophageal pathology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Umair Iqbal; Osama Siddique; Anais Ovalle; Hafsa Anwar; Steven F Moss
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.566

9.  An economic analysis of endoscopic ablative therapy for management of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  A Das; C Wells; H J Kim; D E Fleischer; M D Crowell; V K Sharma
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Global trends in the incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer from 1990 to 2017.

Authors:  Jiahui Fan; Zhenqiu Liu; Xianhua Mao; Xin Tong; Tiejun Zhang; Chen Suo; Xingdong Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.