Literature DB >> 31758474

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.

Karl P Rheinwalt1, Andreas Plamper2, Marcia V Rückbeil3, Andreas Kroh4, Ulf P Neumann4, Tom F Ulmer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: OAGB-MGB emerged as a standard procedure, albeit RYGB remains the most frequently performed gastric bypass. Comparative studies are scarce.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data (July 2006 to November 2017) from a large sample size and adequate follow-up were analyzed using logistic regression and linear mixed models. Total weight loss (TWL) within the first 3 years was defined as primary outcome and duration of operation, perioperative, and late complications and comorbidity remission as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-four OAGB-MGBs (age 42.51 ± 11.36 years, 74.69% females) presented with higher preoperative BMI (53.75 ± 6.51 kg/m2 vs. 44.53 ± 3.65 kg/m2, p < 0.0001) and higher comorbidity prevalence than 288 RYGBs (age 41.4 ± 10.04 years, 79.86% females). Duration of operation was 80.28 ± 20.31 min in OAGB-MGB and 103.36 ± 29.69 min in RYGB (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative complications (4.63% resp. 8.68%), early re-laparoscopy (0.62% resp. 0.69%), leakage (1.23% resp. 1.74%), internal hernias (IH) (0.32% resp. 3.85%), marginal ulcers (3.23% resp. 5.59%), gastroesophageal reflux (3.55% resp. 0.70%), and insufficient weight loss at 3 years (4.19% resp. 5.59 %) were comparable in OAGB-MGB resp. RYGB. Follow-up rates at 1 and 3 years declined from 76.71 to 42.86% (OAGB-MGB) resp. 79.15 to 50.00% (RYGB). TWL (OAGB-MGB, 36.18 ± 9.18%; RYGB, 33.8 ± 8.75%), malnutrition (OAGB-MGB, 4.19%; RYGB, 2.45%), and comorbidity remission 3 years postoperatively revealed comparable robust data. Anastomotic stenosis (1.94% resp. 14.69%) and dumping syndrome (3.55% resp. 6.64%) were less frequent in OAGB-MGB.
CONCLUSIONS: TWL, malnutrition, and comorbidity remission 3 years postoperatively were comparable. Gastroesophageal reflux was less frequent after RYGB (p = 0.0729), whereas shorter operation times (p < 0.0001), less frequent stenosis (p < 0.0001), and dumping syndrome (p = 0.0018) were found in OAGB-MGB. Further RCTs are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Metabolic surgery; Mini-gastric bypass; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31758474     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04250-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  58 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary Report of Five Cases.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  One anastomosis gastric bypass: a simple, safe and efficient surgical procedure for treating morbid obesity.

Authors:  M García-Caballero; M Carbajo
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kelvin Higa; Tienchin Ho; Francisco Tercero; Tahir Yunus; Keith B Boone
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 4.  Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Marta Penna; Vishal Venkat-Ramen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Majid Hashemi
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.734

5.  One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy.

Authors:  Jean Marc Chevallier; Gustavo A Arman; Martino Guenzi; Cedric Rau; Mathieu Bruzzi; Nathan Beaupel; Frank Zinzindohoué; Anne Berger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Chronic Abdominal Pain and Symptoms 5 Years After Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity.

Authors:  Ingvild K Høgestøl; Monica Chahal-Kummen; Inger Eribe; Cathrine Brunborg; Audun Stubhaug; Stephen Hewitt; Jon Kristinsson; Tom Mala
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia with nesidioblastosis after gastric-bypass surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Service; Geoffrey B Thompson; F John Service; James C Andrews; Maria L Collazo-Clavell; Ricardo V Lloyd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results.

Authors:  Andreas Plamper; Philipp Lingohr; Jennifer Nadal; Karl P Rheinwalt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long-term results of a prospective comparison of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in a non-superobese population (BMI 35-50 kg/m(2)).

Authors:  George Skroubis; Natasa Kouri; Nancy Mead; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.

Authors:  W Jay Suggs; Wael Kouli; Michael Lupovici; Wai Yip Chau; Robert E Brolin
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 4.734

View more
  7 in total

1.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients with Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease and/or Hiatus Hernia.

Authors:  Joseph Winstanley; Salman Ahmed; Michael Courtney; Miraheal Sam; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Kermansaravi; Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi; Shahab ShahabiShahmiri; Miguel Carbajo; Antonio Vitiello; Chetan D Parmar; Mario Musella
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Giovanna Berardi; Nunzio Velotti; Vincenzo Schiavone; Cristina Manetti; Antonio Vitiello
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-28

4.  Clinical outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients.

Authors:  Karl Rheinwalt; Tom F Ulmer; Sophia M-T Schmitz; Patrick H Alizai; Andreas Kroh; Sandra Schipper; Jonathan F Brozat; Andreas Plamper; Ulf P Neumann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Nutritional Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Tourky; Mohamed Issa; Mohamed A Salman; Ahmed Salman; Hossam El-Din Shaaban; Ahmed Safina; Abd Al-Kareem Elias; Ahmed Elewa; Khaled Noureldin; Ahmed Abdelrahman Mahmoud; Ahmed Dorra; Mohamed Farah; Mahmoud Gebril; Mujahid Gasemelseed Fadlallah Elhaj; Hesham Barbary
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  Tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass - Subgroup analysis of a randomised control trial based on bilio-pancreatic limb length with long-term results of 101 patients.

Authors:  Mayank Jain; Om Tantia; Ghanshyam Goyal; Tamonas Chaudhuri; Shashi Khanna; Anshuman Poddar; Kajari Majumdar; Sonam Gupta
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass for obesity.

Authors:  Amar Vennapusa; Ramakanth Bhargav Panchangam; Charita Kesara; Nazneen Mallick
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-03-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.