Mohammad Kermansaravi1, Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi2, Shahab ShahabiShahmiri2, Miguel Carbajo3, Antonio Vitiello4, Chetan D Parmar5,6, Mario Musella4. 1. Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 3. Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Calle Estacion, No. 12, 1, 47004, Valladolid, Spain. 4. Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy. 5. Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. drcparmar@gmail.com. 6. University College London Medical School, London, UK. drcparmar@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. CONCLUSION: There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.
PURPOSE: One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. CONCLUSION: There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Consensus; Mini gastric bypass; One anastomosis gastric bypass
Authors: Miguel Carbajo; Manuel García-Caballero; Miguel Toledano; Diego Osorio; Cándido García-Lanza; José Antonio Carmona Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Kuldeepak Singh Kular; Chetan Parmar; Michael Van den Bossche; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Brijesh Madhok; Conor Magee; Sanjay Purkayastha; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Almino C Ramos; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Kamal Mahawar; Wendy Brown; Lilian Kow; Kevin P White; Scott Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Maurizio De Luca; Tiffany Tie; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Scott Shikora; Wendy A Brown Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Jacques Himpens; Scott A Shikora; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Mufazzal Lakdawala; Maurizio De Luca; Rudolf Weiner; Ali Khammas; Kuldeepak Singh Kular; Mario Musella; Gerhard Prager; Mohammad Khalid Mirza; Miguel Carbajo; Lilian Kow; Wei-Jei Lee; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Miguel A Carbajo; Enrique Luque-de-León; José M Jiménez; Javier Ortiz-de-Solórzano; Manuel Pérez-Miranda; María J Castro-Alija Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 4.129