Literature DB >> 17686661

Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.

W Jay Suggs1, Wael Kouli, Michael Lupovici, Wai Yip Chau, Robert E Brolin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications involving the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity frequently result in hospital readmission and additional procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rate of GJ performed with the 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of stricture, bleeding, ulcer, and leak at the GJ in 438 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGB.
RESULTS: The GJ was performed using the 25-mm stapler in 374 patients and the 21-mm stapler in 64 patients. Of the 50 anastomotic complications, 11 (17.2%) occurred with the 21-mm stapler, including 6 strictures (9.4%), 4 ulcers (6.3%), and 1 leak (1.6%), and 39 (10.4%) with the 25-mm stapler, including 11 strictures (2.9%), 6 acute bleeding episodes (1.6%), 19 ulcers (5.4%), and 4 leaks (1.1%). Rehospitalization was required in 9 patients (47%) with a pure stricture and 17 (74%) with ulcers. The incidence of pure stricture was significantly greater in the GJ performed with the 21-mm than with the 25-mm stapler (P = .026, Fisher's exact test). No difference was found in the rate of acute bleeding, leak, or ulcer between the 2 groups. All strictures resolved with balloon dilation. Four patients with stenotic ulcers that failed to respond to dilation and medications required operative revision. No difference was found in postoperative weight loss between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Anastomotic complications were recognized in 50 (11.4%) of 438 patients who had undergone LRYGB in which the GJ was performed using circular staplers, including 11 (17.2%) with the 21-mm and 39 (10.2%) with the 25-mm stapler. The rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly lower using the 25-mm circular stapler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686661     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  21 in total

1.  Estimate or calculate? How surgeons rate volumes and surfaces.

Authors:  Jochen Schuld; Otto Kollmar; Roland Seidel; Catherine Black; Martin K Schilling; Sven Richter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Improved surgical technique for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces complications at the gastrojejunostomy.

Authors:  Michel Suter; Andrea Donadini; Jean-Marie Calmes; Sébastien Romy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Evaluating the Effect of Drain Site on Abdominal Pain after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Eidy; Fatemeh Jesmi; Fahimeh Raygan; Mohadeseh Pishgahroudsari; Abdolreza Pazouki
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 0.607

4.  Impact of gastrojejunostomy diameter on long-term weight loss following laparoscopic gastric bypass: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Carter Smith; Michael Garren; Jon Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  F B Langer; A Bohdjalian; S Shakeri-Manesch; F X Felberbauer; B Ludvik; J Zacherl; G Prager
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  A novel procedure for Roux-en-Y reconstruction following laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: transoral placement of anvil and intracorporeal gastrojejunostomy via umbilical mini-laparotomy.

Authors:  Manabu Ohashi; Tomohiro Iwanaga; Ryouki Ohinata; Tatsuo Kanda; Yoshiaki Iwasaki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Gitana Scozzari; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Paolo Millo; Stefano Rocchietto; Rosaldo Allieta; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Brad E Snyder; Todd Wilson; Terry Scarborough; Sherman Yu; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-09-02

Review 9.  Development of ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, incidence, risk factors, and patient presentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Amin B Goucham; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Sjoerd D Kuiken; Bart A van Wagensveld
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Comparison of marginal ulcer rates between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Lara Ribeiro-Parenti; Konstantinos Arapis; Denis Chosidow; Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.