Literature DB >> 36169887

Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence.

Mario Musella1, Giovanna Berardi2, Nunzio Velotti2, Vincenzo Schiavone2, Cristina Manetti2, Antonio Vitiello2.   

Abstract

Very little has been published on the learning curve (LC) of the One Anastomosis /Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB). Aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of OABG/MGBs performed during the LC of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon to global benchmark cut-offs. First 200 patients undergoing OAGB/MGB at our university hospital from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively included in this study. LC of the surgeon was divided in two groups of 100 consecutive patients each and perioperative outcomes were compared to abovementioned global benchmarks for LSG and RYGB. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed for operative time and hospital stay. Uneventful postoperative recovery was recorded in 95% of patients. All benchmark values for RYGB were met in group 2. Comparison with cut-offs for LSG showed longer hospital stay and operative time in both groups but postoperative rate of complications resulted lower even for Group 1. CUSUM graph of the operative time runs randomly above the predetermined limit till the 40th cases but reaches the plateau after the 115th operation. CUSUM curve of the hospital stay reaches the plateau after the 57th case. OAGB/MGB confirms to be a feasible procedure, which can be safely and effectively performed during the learning curve. However, at least 100 hundred cases are required to reduce operative time and hospital stay.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Global benchmarks; Learning curve; Mini-gastric bypass; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Surgical training

Year:  2022        PMID: 36169887     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  16 in total

1.  Learning curve for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: role of training in a high-volume bariatric center.

Authors:  Giovanni Casella; Emanuele Soricelli; Domenico Giannotti; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Alfredo Genco; Nicola Basso; Adriano Redler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A decade of bariatric surgery. What have we learned? Outcome in 520 patients from a single institution.

Authors:  M Musella; M Milone; D Gaudioso; P Bianco; R Palumbo; G Galloro; M Bellini; F Milone
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Bariatric Surgery Worldwide: Baseline Demographic Description and One-Year Outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018.

Authors:  Richard Welbourn; Marianne Hollyman; Robin Kinsman; John Dixon; Ronald Liem; Johan Ottosson; Almino Ramos; Villy Våge; Salman Al-Sabah; Wendy Brown; Ricardo Cohen; Peter Walton; Jacques Himpens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Desheng Jia; Huiwen Tan; Andrew Faramand; Fang Fang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Defining Global Benchmarks in Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Minimally Invasive Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Dimitri A Raptis; Wouter Vleeschouwers; Sophie L van Veldhuisen; Andres San Martin; Yao Xiao; Manoela Galvao; Marcoandrea Giorgi; Marine Benois; Felipe Espinoza; Marianne Hollyman; Aaron Lloyd; Hanna Hosa; Henner Schmidt; José Luis Garcia-Galocha; Simon van de Vrande; Sonja Chiappetta; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Cristina Mamédio Aboud; Sandra Gagliardo Lüthy; Philippa Orchard; Steffi Rothe; Gerhard Prager; Dimitri J Pournaras; Ricardo Cohen; Raul Rosenthal; Rudolf Weiner; Jacques Himpens; Antonio Torres; Kelvin Higa; Richard Welbourn; Marcos Berry; Camilo Boza; Antonio Iannelli; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Almino Ramos; Torsten Olbers; Matias Sepúlveda; Eric J Hazebroek; Bruno Dillemans; Roxane D Staiger; Milo A Puhan; Ralph Peterli; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Weu Wang; Yi-Chih Lee; Ming-Te Huang; Kong-Han Ser; Jung-Chien Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Lo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.

Authors:  Karl P Rheinwalt; Andreas Plamper; Marcia V Rückbeil; Andreas Kroh; Ulf P Neumann; Tom F Ulmer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Evaluation of reflux following sleeve gastrectomy and one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year results from a randomized open-label controlled trial.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Antonio Vitiello; Giovanna Berardi; Nunzio Velotti; Marcella Pesce; Giovanni Sarnelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Learning curve and global benchmark values of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: results of first 100 cases of a newly trained surgeon in an Italian center of excellence.

Authors:  Antonio Vitiello; Giovanna Berardi; Nunzio Velotti; Vincenzo Schiavone; Mario Musella
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.