Literature DB >> 21807568

Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity.

Sheraz R Markar1, Marta Penna, Vishal Venkat-Ramen, Alan Karthikesalingam, Majid Hashemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to provide a pooled analysis of individual small trials comparing 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled laparoscopic gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis in morbid obesity surgery.
METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify all relevant studies comparing 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled laparoscopic GJ anastomosis in morbid obesity surgery. The primary outcomes were GJ stenosis and the interval to GJ stenosis. The secondary outcomes were the estimated weight loss, GJ diameter, and the number of endoscopic dilations. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for categorical outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes.
RESULTS: Five trials were included, comprising 1217 patients (393 with 21-mm and 824 with 25-mm circular GJ anastomoses). The primary outcome analysis revealed a significantly increased incidence of intraluminal stenosis associated with the 21-mm circular stapler (pooled odds ratio 3.54; P < .0001). The secondary outcome analysis revealed a significantly reduced GJ anastomotic diameter on endoscopy with the 21-mm circular stapler group (weighted mean difference -1.67; P = .002). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the groups for the interval to stenosis, number of endoscopic dilations, and estimated weight loss.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present pooled analysis have demonstrated a significantly increased incidence of symptomatic stenosis associated with the 21-mm circular stapler compared with the 25-mm stapler. This serves as evidence to validate the preferential selection of the 25-mm circular stapler for laparoscopic GJ bypass. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21807568     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  5 in total

1.  A systematic review of the effect of gastric pouch and/or gastrojejunostomy (stoma) size on weight loss outcomes with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kamal Mahawar; Alistair J Sharples; Yitka Graham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss and patient satisfaction 5 years after gastric bypass: a study of three techniques for the gastrojejunal anastomosis.

Authors:  E Sima; J Hedberg; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Association Between Circular Stapler Diameter and Stricture Rates Following Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Allen; C I Wells; M Greenslade; I P Bissett; G O'Grady
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Linear compared to circular stapler anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leads to comparable weight loss with fewer complications: a matched pair study.

Authors:  Romano Schneider; Jörn-Markus Gass; Beatrice Kern; Thomas Peters; Marc Slawik; Martina Gebhart; Ralph Peterli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.

Authors:  Karl P Rheinwalt; Andreas Plamper; Marcia V Rückbeil; Andreas Kroh; Ulf P Neumann; Tom F Ulmer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.