Literature DB >> 30625380

Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops.

Tingting Guo1, Xiaoqing Yu1, Xianran Li1, Haozhe Zhang2, Chengsong Zhu1, Sherry Flint-Garcia3, Michael D McMullen3, James B Holland4, Stephen J Szalma4, Randall J Wisser5, Jianming Yu6.   

Abstract

Improved capacity of genomics and biotechnology has greatly enhanced genetic studies in different areas. Genomic selection exploits the genotype-to-phenotype relationship at the whole-genome level and is being implemented in many crops. Here we show that design-thinking and data-mining techniques can be leveraged to optimize genomic prediction of hybrid performance. We phenotyped a set of 276 maize hybrids generated by crossing founder inbreds of nested association mapping populations for flowering time, ear height, and grain yield. With 10 296 310 SNPs available from the parental inbreds, we explored the patterns of genomic relationships and phenotypic variation to establish training samples based on clustering, graphic network analysis, and genetic mating scheme. Our analysis showed that training set designs outperformed random sampling and earlier methods that either minimize the mean of prediction error variance or maximize the mean of generalized coefficient of determination. Additional analyses of 2556 wheat hybrids from an early-stage hybrid breeding system and 1439 rice hybrids from an established hybrid breeding system validated the approaches. Together, we demonstrated that effective genomic prediction models can be established with a training set 2%-13% of the size of the whole set, enabling an efficient exploration of enormous inference space of genetic combinations.
Copyright © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data mining; genomic relationship; genomic selection; molecular breeding; optimal design

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625380     DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant        ISSN: 1674-2052            Impact factor:   13.164


  20 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Target-oriented prioritization: targeted selection strategy by integrating organismal and molecular traits through predictive analytics in breeding.

Authors:  Wenyu Yang; Tingting Guo; Jingyun Luo; Ruyang Zhang; Jiuran Zhao; Marilyn L Warburton; Yingjie Xiao; Jianbing Yan
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  An adaptive teosinte mexicana introgression modulates phosphatidylcholine levels and is associated with maize flowering time.

Authors:  Allison C Barnes; Fausto Rodríguez-Zapata; Karla A Juárez-Núñez; Daniel J Gates; Garrett M Janzen; Andi Kur; Li Wang; Sarah E Jensen; Juan M Estévez-Palmas; Taylor M Crow; Heli S Kavi; Hannah D Pil; Ruthie L Stokes; Kevan T Knizner; Maria R Aguilar-Rangel; Edgar Demesa-Arévalo; Tara Skopelitis; Sergio Pérez-Limón; Whitney L Stutts; Peter Thompson; Yu-Chun Chiu; David Jackson; David C Muddiman; Oliver Fiehn; Daniel Runcie; Edward S Buckler; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Matthew B Hufford; Ruairidh J H Sawers; Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.

Authors:  C Anilkumar; N C Sunitha; Narayana Bhat Devate; S Ramesh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Incorporation of parental phenotypic data into multi-omic models improves prediction of yield-related traits in hybrid rice.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Yue Zhao; Xin Wang; Ying Ma; Pengcheng Li; Zefeng Yang; Xuecai Zhang; Chenwu Xu; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.803

6.  Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.

Authors:  K O G Dias; H P Piepho; L J M Guimarães; P E O Guimarães; S N Parentoni; M O Pinto; R W Noda; J V Magalhães; C T Guimarães; A A F Garcia; M M Pastina
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment.

Authors:  Anna R Rogers; Jeffrey C Dunne; Cinta Romay; Martin Bohn; Edward S Buckler; Ignacio A Ciampitti; Jode Edwards; David Ertl; Sherry Flint-Garcia; Michael A Gore; Christopher Graham; Candice N Hirsch; Elizabeth Hood; David C Hooker; Joseph Knoll; Elizabeth C Lee; Aaron Lorenz; Jonathan P Lynch; John McKay; Stephen P Moose; Seth C Murray; Rebecca Nelson; Torbert Rocheford; James C Schnable; Patrick S Schnable; Rajandeep Sekhon; Maninder Singh; Margaret Smith; Nathan Springer; Kurt Thelen; Peter Thomison; Addie Thompson; Mitch Tuinstra; Jason Wallace; Randall J Wisser; Wenwei Xu; A R Gilmour; Shawn M Kaeppler; Natalia De Leon; James B Holland
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Optimization of training sets for genomic prediction of early-stage single crosses in maize.

Authors:  Dnyaneshwar C Kadam; Oscar R Rodriguez; Aaron J Lorenz
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Luis Gallego-Sánchez; Gracia Montilla-Bascón; Francisco J Canales; Julio Isidro Y Sánchez; Elena Prats
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Unlocking big data doubled the accuracy in predicting the grain yield in hybrid wheat.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Patrick Thorwarth; Yong Jiang; Norman Philipp; Albert W Schulthess; Mario Gils; Philipp H G Boeven; C Friedrich H Longin; Johannes Schacht; Erhard Ebmeyer; Viktor Korzun; Vilson Mirdita; Jost Dörnte; Ulrike Avenhaus; Ralf Horbach; Hilmar Cöster; Josef Holzapfel; Ludwig Ramgraber; Simon Kühnle; Pierrick Varenne; Anne Starke; Friederike Schürmann; Sebastian Beier; Uwe Scholz; Fang Liu; Renate H Schmidt; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.