PURPOSE: Variation in contouring quality by radiation oncologists is common and can have significant clinical consequences. Image-based guidelines can improve contour accuracy but are underused. We sought to develop a free, online, easily accessible contouring resource that allows users to scroll through cases with 3-dimensional images and access relevant evidence-based contouring information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: eContour (http://econtour.org) was developed using modern Web technologies, primarily HTML5, Python, and JavaScript, to display JPEGs generated from DICOM files from real patient cases. The viewer has standard tools for image manipulation as well as toggling of contours and overlayed images and radiation dose distributions. Brief written content references published guidelines for contour delineation. Mixpanel software was used to collect Web page usage statistics. RESULTS: In the first 3 years of operation (March 8, 2016 to March 7, 2019), a total of 13,391 users from 128 countries registered on the Web site, including 2,358 physicians from the United States. High-frequency users were more likely to be physicians (P < .001) and from the United States (P < .001). In one 6-month period, there were 68,642 individual case page views, with head-and-neck the most commonly viewed disease site (32%). Users who accessed a head-and-neck case were more likely to be high-frequency users, and 67% of repeat users accessed the same case more than once. CONCLUSION: The large, diverse user base and steady growth in Web site traffic over the first 3 years of eContour demonstrate its strong potential to address the unmet need for dissemination and use of evidence-based contouring information at the point of care.
PURPOSE: Variation in contouring quality by radiation oncologists is common and can have significant clinical consequences. Image-based guidelines can improve contour accuracy but are underused. We sought to develop a free, online, easily accessible contouring resource that allows users to scroll through cases with 3-dimensional images and access relevant evidence-based contouring information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: eContour (http://econtour.org) was developed using modern Web technologies, primarily HTML5, Python, and JavaScript, to display JPEGs generated from DICOM files from real patient cases. The viewer has standard tools for image manipulation as well as toggling of contours and overlayed images and radiation dose distributions. Brief written content references published guidelines for contour delineation. Mixpanel software was used to collect Web page usage statistics. RESULTS: In the first 3 years of operation (March 8, 2016 to March 7, 2019), a total of 13,391 users from 128 countries registered on the Web site, including 2,358 physicians from the United States. High-frequency users were more likely to be physicians (P < .001) and from the United States (P < .001). In one 6-month period, there were 68,642 individual case page views, with head-and-neck the most commonly viewed disease site (32%). Users who accessed a head-and-neck case were more likely to be high-frequency users, and 67% of repeat users accessed the same case more than once. CONCLUSION: The large, diverse user base and steady growth in Web site traffic over the first 3 years of eContour demonstrate its strong potential to address the unmet need for dissemination and use of evidence-based contouring information at the point of care.
Authors: Brett W Cox; Daniel E Spratt; Michael Lovelock; Mark H Bilsky; Eric Lis; Samuel Ryu; Jason Sheehan; Peter C Gerszten; Eric Chang; Iris Gibbs; Scott Soltys; Arjun Sahgal; Joe Deasy; John Flickinger; Mubina Quader; Stefan Mindea; Yoshiya Yamada Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Maximilian Niyazi; Michael Brada; Anthony J Chalmers; Stephanie E Combs; Sara C Erridge; Alba Fiorentino; Anca L Grosu; Frank J Lagerwaard; Giuseppe Minniti; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Umberto Ricardi; Susan C Short; Damien C Weber; Claus Belka Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Joachim Yahalom; Tim Illidge; Lena Specht; Richard T Hoppe; Ye-Xiong Li; Richard Tsang; Andrew Wirth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Erin F Gillespie; Neil Panjwani; Daniel W Golden; Jillian Gunther; Tobias R Chapman; Jeffrey V Brower; Robert Kosztyla; Grant Larson; Pushpa Neppala; Vitali Moiseenko; Julie Bykowski; Parag Sanghvi; James D Murphy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Shearwood McClelland; Marina Chernykh; Natalia Dengina; Erin F Gillespie; Anna Likhacheva; Sergey Usychkin; Alexandr Pankratov; Ekaterina Kharitonova; Yulia Egorova; Ilya Tsimafeyeu; Sergei Tjulandin; Charles R Thomas; Timur Mitin Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Panayiotis Mavroidis; Drosoula Giantsoudis; Musaddiq J Awan; Jasper Nijkamp; Coen R N Rasch; Joop C Duppen; Charles R Thomas; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Lisa A Kachnic; Niko Papanikolaou; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Y Helen Zhang; Elaine Cha; Kathleen Lynch; Renee Gennarelli; Jeffrey Brower; Michael V Sherer; Daniel W Golden; Susan Chimonas; Deborah Korenstein; Erin F Gillespie Journal: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 1.667
Authors: Erik Ziegler; Trinity Urban; Danny Brown; James Petts; Steve D Pieper; Rob Lewis; Chris Hafey; Gordon J Harris Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2020-04
Authors: Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Dolores De La Mata; Beatriz Amendola; Benjamin Li; Adela Poitevin; Gustavo Sarria; Sebastian Sole; David J Sher; Patricia Hardenbergh Journal: JCO Glob Oncol Date: 2021-01