Literature DB >> 25537313

Usability study of the EduMod eLearning Program for contouring nodal stations of the head and neck.

Rohan Deraniyagala1, Robert J Amdur2, Arthur L Boyer3, Scott Kaylor3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A major strategy for improving radiation oncology education and competence evaluation is to develop eLearning programs that reproduce the real work environment. A valuable measure of the quality of an eLearning program is "usability," which is a multidimensional endpoint defined from the end user's perspective. The gold standard for measuring usability is the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI). The purpose of this study is to use the SUMI to measure usability of an eLearning course that uses innovative software to teach and test contouring of nodal stations of the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a prospective institutional review board-approved study in which all participants gave written informed consent. The study population was radiation oncology residents from 8 different programs across the United States. The subjects had to pass all sections of the same 2 eLearning modules and then complete the SUMI usability evaluation instrument. We reached the accrual goal of 25 participants. Usability results for the EduMod eLearning course, "Nodal Stations of the Head and Neck," were compared with a large database of scores of other major software programs. Results were evaluated in 5 domains: Affect, Helpfulness, Control, Learnability, and Global Usability.
RESULTS: In all 5 domains, usability scores for the study modules were higher than the database mean and statistically superior in 4 domains.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate usability of an eLearning program related to radiation oncology. Usability of 2 representative modules related to contouring nodal stations of the head and neck was highly favorable, with scores that were superior to the industry standard in multiple domains. These results support the continued development of this type of eLearning program for teaching and testing radiation oncology technical skills.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537313     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  5 in total

1.  Impact of high-fidelity e-learning on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in radiation oncology trainees.

Authors:  C Gillan; J Papadakos; J Brual; N Harnett; A Hogan; E Milne; M E Giuliani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Simulation as More Than a Treatment-Planning Tool: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Radiation Oncology Simulation-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; Fan Zhu; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Ryan P McKillip; Matthew Lineberry; Ara Tekian; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Development and Usage of eContour, a Novel, Three-Dimensional, Image-Based Web Site to Facilitate Access to Contouring Guidelines at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Kartikeya Puri; Neil Panjwani; Zhigang Zhang; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-10

4.  A Prostate Fossa Contouring Instructional Module: Implementation and Evaluation.

Authors:  Jillian R Gunther; Stanley L Liauw; Seungtaek Choi; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Nikhil G Thaker; Clifton D Fuller; Christopher J Stepaniak; Prajnan Das; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Usability: An introduction to and literature review of usability testing for educational resources in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Heather L Keenan; Simon L Duke; Heather J Wharrad; Gillian A Doody; Rakesh S Patel
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.