Literature DB >> 28262474

Multi-institutional Randomized Trial Testing the Utility of an Interactive Three-dimensional Contouring Atlas Among Radiation Oncology Residents.

Erin F Gillespie1, Neil Panjwani2, Daniel W Golden3, Jillian Gunther4, Tobias R Chapman5, Jeffrey V Brower6, Robert Kosztyla7, Grant Larson2, Pushpa Neppala2, Vitali Moiseenko2, Julie Bykowski8, Parag Sanghvi2, James D Murphy2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The delivery of safe and effective radiation therapy relies on accurate target delineation, particularly in the era of highly conformal treatment techniques. Current contouring resources are fragmented and can be cumbersome to use. The present study reports on the efficacy and usability of a web-based contouring atlas compared with those of existing contouring resources in a randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled radiation oncology residents into a 2-phase contouring study. All residents contoured a T1N1 nasopharyngeal cancer case using the currently available resources. The participants were then randomized to recontour the case with access to existing resources or an interactive web-based contouring atlas (eContour.org). Contour analysis was performed using conformation number and simultaneous truth and performance level estimation. At completion of the second contouring session, the residents completed a multiple choice question knowledge test and a 10-item System Usability Scale.
RESULTS: Twenty-four residents from 5 institutions completed the study. Compared with the residents using currently available resources, the residents using eContour had improved contour agreement with both the consensus (0.63 vs 0.52; P=.02) and the expert (0.58 vs 0.50; P=.01) contours for the high-risk clinical target volume and greater agreement with the expert contour for the contralateral parotid gland (0.44 ± 0.12 vs 0.56 ± 0.08; P=.003). The residents using eContour demonstrated greater knowledge of contour delineation and radiographic anatomy on a multiple-choice knowledge-based test (89% vs 77%; P=.03). Usability (89 vs 66; P<.0001) and satisfaction (4.1 vs 3.0; P=.002) were greater for eContour than for the existing resources.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the capacity of an interactive 3-dimensional contouring atlas to improve quality of resident target delineation in radiation oncology. Further research is needed to define the utility of easily accessible interactive educational reference tool to improve adherence to contouring-based guidelines and quality of care in routine clinical practice. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28262474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training: Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Marina Chernykh; Natalia Dengina; Erin F Gillespie; Anna Likhacheva; Sergey Usychkin; Alexandr Pankratov; Ekaterina Kharitonova; Yulia Egorova; Ilya Tsimafeyeu; Sergei Tjulandin; Charles R Thomas; Timur Mitin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Impact of high-fidelity e-learning on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in radiation oncology trainees.

Authors:  C Gillan; J Papadakos; J Brual; N Harnett; A Hogan; E Milne; M E Giuliani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Simulation as More Than a Treatment-Planning Tool: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Radiation Oncology Simulation-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; Fan Zhu; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Ryan P McKillip; Matthew Lineberry; Ara Tekian; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Development and Usage of eContour, a Novel, Three-Dimensional, Image-Based Web Site to Facilitate Access to Contouring Guidelines at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Kartikeya Puri; Neil Panjwani; Zhigang Zhang; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-10

Review 5.  Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group Annual Spring Symposium: Initial Impact and Feedback.

Authors:  David M Rosenberg; Steve E Braunstein; Emma C Fields; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Rachel B Jimenez; Raphael L Yechieli; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Prospective International Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Self-Guided Contouring Teaching Module With Integrated Feedback for Transitioning From 2D to 3D Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Mustafa Abugideiri; Eduard Schreibmann; Jeffrey Switchenko; Mark W McDonald; Jonathan J Beitler; Walter J Curran; Deborah Bruner; Pretesh Patel; Wondemagegnhu Tigeneh; Miressa Mijena; Sibo Tian; Anees Dhabaan; Natia Esiashvili; Tian Liu; Arif N Ali
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-05

7.  Initial experience with introducing national guidelines for CT- and MRI-based delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Caroline Olsson; Tufve Nyholm; Elinore Wieslander; Eva Onjukka; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Johan Reizenstein; Stefan Johnsson; Ingrid Kristensen; Johan Skönevik; Magnus Karlsson; Ulf Isacsson; Anna Flejmer; Edvard Abel; Fredrik Nordström; Leif Nyström; Kjell Bergfeldt; Björn Zackrisson; Alexander Valdman
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23

8.  Development of explanatory movies for the delineation of new organs at risk in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Dario Di Perri; David Hofstede; Alida Postma; Catharina M L Zegers; Lieke In't Ven; Frank Hoebers; Wouter van Elmpt; Lindsey Verheesen; Hilde Beurskens; Esther G C Troost; Inge Compter; Danielle B P Eekers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  National Cancer Institute Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology: Training the Next Generation.

Authors:  John Kang; Reid F Thompson; Sanjay Aneja; Constance Lehman; Andrew Trister; James Zou; Ceferino Obcemea; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-13

10.  A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation.

Authors:  Ingrid Kristensen; Kristina Nilsson; Måns Agrup; Karin Belfrage; Anna Embring; Hedda Haugen; Anna-Maja Svärd; Tommy Knöös; Per Nilsson
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.