Peter A Bonis1, Gary T Pickens, David M Rind, David A Foster. 1. Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, UpToDate Inc., Waltham, MA 02453, United States. pbonis@uptodate.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electronic clinical knowledge support systems have decreased barriers to answering clinical questions but there is little evidence as to whether they have an impact on health outcomes. METHODS: We compared hospitals with online access to UpToDate with other acute care hospitals included in the Thomson 100 Top Hospitals Database (Thomson database). Metrics used in the Thomson database differentiate hospitals on a variety of performance dimensions such as quality and efficiency. Prespecified outcomes were risk-adjusted mortality, complications, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators, and hospital length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries. Linear regression models were developed that included adjustment for hospital region, teaching status, and discharge volume. RESULTS: Hospitals with access to UpToDate (n=424) were associated with significantly better performance than other hospitals in the Thomson database (n=3091) on risk-adjusted measures of patient safety (P=0.0163) and complications (P=0.0012) and had significantly shorter length of stay (by on average 0.167 days per discharge, 95% confidence interval 0.081-0.252 days, P<0.0001). All of these associations correlated significantly with how much UpToDate was used at each hospital. Mortality was not significantly different between UpToDate and non-UpToDate hospitals. LIMITATIONS: The study was retrospective and observational and could not fully account for additional features at the included hospitals that may also have been associated with better health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic clinical knowledge support system (UpToDate was associated with improved health outcomes and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States. Additional studies are needed to clarify whether use of UpToDate is a marker for the better performance, an independent cause of it, or a synergistic part of other quality improvement characteristics at better-performing hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Electronic clinical knowledge support systems have decreased barriers to answering clinical questions but there is little evidence as to whether they have an impact on health outcomes. METHODS: We compared hospitals with online access to UpToDate with other acute care hospitals included in the Thomson 100 Top Hospitals Database (Thomson database). Metrics used in the Thomson database differentiate hospitals on a variety of performance dimensions such as quality and efficiency. Prespecified outcomes were risk-adjusted mortality, complications, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators, and hospital length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries. Linear regression models were developed that included adjustment for hospital region, teaching status, and discharge volume. RESULTS: Hospitals with access to UpToDate (n=424) were associated with significantly better performance than other hospitals in the Thomson database (n=3091) on risk-adjusted measures of patient safety (P=0.0163) and complications (P=0.0012) and had significantly shorter length of stay (by on average 0.167 days per discharge, 95% confidence interval 0.081-0.252 days, P<0.0001). All of these associations correlated significantly with how much UpToDate was used at each hospital. Mortality was not significantly different between UpToDate and non-UpToDate hospitals. LIMITATIONS: The study was retrospective and observational and could not fully account for additional features at the included hospitals that may also have been associated with better health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic clinical knowledge support system (UpToDate was associated with improved health outcomes and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States. Additional studies are needed to clarify whether use of UpToDate is a marker for the better performance, an independent cause of it, or a synergistic part of other quality improvement characteristics at better-performing hospitals.
Authors: Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Carmit K McMullen; James L McCormack; Adam Wright; Arwen Bunce; Joseph Wasserman; Vishnu Mohan; Deborah J Cohen; Michael Shapiro; Blackford Middleton Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2011-10-22
Authors: Bret S E Heale; Casey Lynnette Overby; Guilherme Del Fiol; Wendy S Rubinstein; Donna R Maglott; Tristan H Nelson; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Christa L Martin; Scott R Goehringer; Robert Freimuth; Marc S Williams Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Kartikeya Puri; Neil Panjwani; Zhigang Zhang; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2019-10
Authors: David A Cook; Kristi J Sorensen; Jane A Linderbaum; Laurie J Pencille; Deborah J Rhodes Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: David A Cook; Miguel T Teixeira; Bret Se Heale; James J Cimino; Guilherme Del Fiol Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thomas Agoritsas; Arnaud Merglen; Delphine S Courvoisier; Christophe Combescure; Nicolas Garin; Arnaud Perrier; Thomas V Perneger Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 5.428