Literature DB >> 29938298

Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training: Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia.

Shearwood McClelland1, Marina Chernykh2,3, Natalia Dengina3,4, Erin F Gillespie5, Anna Likhacheva3,6, Sergey Usychkin3,7, Alexandr Pankratov3,8, Ekaterina Kharitonova9, Yulia Egorova9, Ilya Tsimafeyeu9, Sergei Tjulandin9, Charles R Thomas10, Timur Mitin10,3.   

Abstract

Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical target volume; Global oncology; Organs at risk; RUSSCO; Radiation oncology; Russia; eContour.org

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29938298     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  8 in total

1.  Multi-institutional Randomized Trial Testing the Utility of an Interactive Three-dimensional Contouring Atlas Among Radiation Oncology Residents.

Authors:  Erin F Gillespie; Neil Panjwani; Daniel W Golden; Jillian Gunther; Tobias R Chapman; Jeffrey V Brower; Robert Kosztyla; Grant Larson; Pushpa Neppala; Vitali Moiseenko; Julie Bykowski; Parag Sanghvi; James D Murphy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  The Red Beam: Past, Present, and Future of Radiation Oncology in Russia.

Authors:  Anna Likhacheva; Timur Mitin; Evgeni Khmelevsky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Evaluation of dosimetric consequences of seroma contour variability in accelerated partial breast irradiation using a constructed representative seroma contour.

Authors:  Robert Kosztyla; Robert Olson; Hannah Carolan; Susan Balkwill; Vitali Moiseenko; Winkle Kwan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Contouring variations and the role of atlas in non-small cell lung cancer radiation therapy: Analysis of a multi-institutional preclinical trial planning study.

Authors:  Yunfeng Cui; Wenzhou Chen; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Lindsey A Olsen; Ronald E Beatty; Peter G Maxim; Timothy Ritter; Jason W Sohn; Jane Higgins; James M Galvin; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30

6.  Interobserver variability in target definition for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombus: radiation therapy oncology group consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; Walter R Bosch; Sunil Krishnan; Tae K Kim; Harvey J Mamon; Paul Shyn; Edgar Ben-Josef; Jinsil Seong; Michael G Haddock; Jason C Cheng; Mary U Feng; Kevin L Stephans; David Roberge; Christopher Crane; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning.

Authors:  C Fiorino; M Reni; A Bolognesi; G M Cattaneo; R Calandrino
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Quantitative assessment of inter-observer variability in target volume delineation on stereotactic radiotherapy treatment for pituitary adenoma and meningioma near optic tract.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Hiroya Shiomi; Takuji Tsubokura; Naohiro Kodani; Takuya Nishimura; Norihiro Aibe; Hiroki Udono; Manabu Nishikata; Yoshimi Baba; Mikio Ogita; Koichi Yamashita; Tadayuki Kotsuma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and Usage of eContour, a Novel, Three-Dimensional, Image-Based Web Site to Facilitate Access to Contouring Guidelines at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Kartikeya Puri; Neil Panjwani; Zhigang Zhang; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-10

2.  Education in Radiation Oncology-Current Challenges and Difficulties.

Authors:  Camil Ciprian Mireștean; Roxana Irina Iancu; Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.