| Literature DB >> 31744098 |
Andrzej Soroka1, Julia Wojciechowska-Solis2.
Abstract
The aim of the paper was to determine the relationship between the physical activity undertaken by Polish consumers and their attitude towards organic food. The motives for the selection of organic food, the barriers that consumers face when buying it, and the requirements set by consumers were determined. The research was carried out by means of a diagnostic survey using the author's questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). In total, 3436 respondents from all over Poland were examined using the selected research sample. Statistica 13.1 PL was used for statistical analyses. The results of the research indicate that the main reasons for the selection of organic food, especially among physically active respondents, were the perceived lack of harmful substances and that it is healthy in itself. The study showed that physically active respondents preferred to purchase, to a greater extent, less processed food produced in a natural way and on organic farms. The main reason for purchasing organic food in physically inactive respondents was due to its taste values. The originality of the paper stems from demonstrating differences and similarities in the motives for buying organic food expressed by physically active consumers and those preferring passive lifestyles.Entities:
Keywords: Polish consumers; consumer choice; discriminant analysis; health lifestyle; motives and barriers; organic food consumption
Year: 2019 PMID: 31744098 PMCID: PMC6915680 DOI: 10.3390/foods8110581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Motives for the selection of organic food by Polish residents, including declared physical activity.
| Motives Associated with Organic Food Selection | Model of Discriminant Analysis | Classification Function | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilks′ Lambda: 0.563 | Declared Physical Activity | ||||
| Wilks′ Lambda | F Value | Active | Inactive | ||
| Searching for childhood flavors | 0.563 | 15.389 | 0.001 * | 0.844 | 1.135 |
| Such food is healthy | 0.602 | 9.538 | 0.001 * | 1.297 | 1.049 |
| Does not contain harmful substances | 0.598 | 6.621 | 0.010 * | 1.199 | 1.065 |
| I care about healthy nutrition of my relatives | 0.576 | 2.207 | 0.138 | 0.980 | 0.894 |
| I care about the natural environment | 0.582 | 10.291 | 0.001 * | 0.987 | 0.662 |
| Constants | 12.309 | 11.562 | |||
* Level of significance at p < 0.050. Source: Authors′ own analysis based on study material.
Type of purchased organic food.
| Type of food | Model of Discriminant Analysis | Classification Function | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilks′ Lambda: 0.623 | Declared Physical Activity | ||||
| Wilks′ Lambda | F Value | Active | Inactive | ||
| Fresh vegetables and their preserves | 0.652 | 7.553 | 0,006 * | 1.641 | 1.476 |
| Cereal products | 0.638 | 8.310 | 0.004 * | 1.124 | 0.970 |
| Goat’s milk and its products | 0.687 | 9.250 | 0.002 * | 1.236 | 1.085 |
| Eggs | 0.659 | 4.990 | 0.025 * | 1.722 | 1.600 |
| Cow’s milk and its products | 0.632 | 5.329 | 0.021 * | 1.059 | 1.184 |
| Pork and its products | 0.629 | 1.270 | 0.259 | 1.541 | 1.502 |
| Constants | 15.987 | 14.802 | |||
* Level of significant difference at p < 0.050. Source: Authors′ own analysis based on study material.
Barriers affecting the purchase of organic food.
| Type of Barriers Related to the Purchase | Model of Discriminant Analysis | Classification Function | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilks′ Lambda: 0.583 | Declared Physical Activity | ||||
| Wilks′ Lambda | F Value | Active | Inactive | ||
| I do not trust organic food | 0.582 | 17.025 | 0.001 * | 0.577 | 0.990 |
| There are many problems with the purchase of such food | 0.562 | 5.465 | 0.019 * | 1.312 | 1.147 |
| I cannot distinguish organic food | 0.591 | 11.566 | 0.001 * | 0.567 | 0.921 |
| Organic food is too expensive | 0.604 | 2.282 | 0.131 | 2.328 | 2.421 |
| I do not pay much attention to the purchase of such food | 0.589 | 16.289 | 0.001 * | 0.515 | 0.944 |
| Constants | 8.731 | 10.077 | |||
* Level of significant difference at p < 0.050. Source: Authors′ own analysis based on study material.
Requirements for organic food set by respondents.
| Type of Requirements | Model of Discriminant Analysis | Classification Function | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilks′ Lambda: 0.654 | Declared Physical Activity | ||||
| Wilks′ Lambda | F Value | Active | Inactive | ||
| Low-processed, short shelf-life | 0.621 | 28.718 | 0.001 * | 1.203 | 0.856 |
| It should contain low salt content | 0.658 | 16.777 | 0.001 * | 0.456 | 0.158 |
| Produced in a natural way | 0.679 | 20.672 | 0.001 * | 1.472 | 1.071 |
| Production on an organic farm | 0.628 | 21.452 | 0.001 * | 1.468 | 0.998 |
| Environmentally friendly packaging | 0.687 | 12.569 | 0.001 * | 0.905 | 0.508 |
| Rich in nutrients | 0.659 | 3.827 | 0.058 | 0.846 | 0.714 |
| High taste values | 0.634 | 4.911 | 0.038 * | 1.140 | 1.356 |
| It should contain low fat content | 0.639 | 1.487 | 0.226 | 0.740 | 0.644 |
| Constants | 16.850 | 15.377 | |||
* Level of significant difference at p < 0.050. Source: Authors′ own analysis based on study material.