| Literature DB >> 34073514 |
Abstract
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has strongly influenced consumers' habits and behaviours, creating a more sustainable and healthier era of consumption. Hence, there is a potential for further expanding the green food sector in China. The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) is one widely used framework to explain consumers' food choices. Considering consumers' internal norms, their perceptions of green food attributes, and the shifting consumer behaviour, our study has extended the TPB framework (E-TPB) by adding constructs of moral attitude, health consciousness, and the impact of COVID-19 (IOC). The results of structural equation modelling among 360 functional samples revealed that the E-TPB model has a superior explanatory and predictive power, compared with the original TPB model regarding Chinese consumers' green food buying intentions in the current and post-pandemic periods. The path analysis demonstrated that attitude, perceived behavioural control, moral attitude, health consciousness, and IOC have significant positive effects on green food purchase intentions. However, the association between subjective norm and purchase intention varies within the TPB and E-TPB models, which showed a non-significant impact in E-TPB. These findings can generate more suitable managerial implications to promote green food consumption in China during the current and post-pandemic periods.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Chinese consumer; E-TPB; TPB; green food; purchase intention
Year: 2021 PMID: 34073514 PMCID: PMC8227529 DOI: 10.3390/foods10061200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Research model: the white blocks are variables in the standard TPB model; the grey blocks and the white blocks are variables in the E-TPB model; H1, Hypothesis 1; H2, Hypothesis 2; H3, Hypothesis 3; H4, Hypothesis 4; H5, Hypothesis 5; H6, Hypothesis 6; H7, Hypothesis 7.
Demographics of samples (n = 360).
| Demographics Variables | Frequency | Percent (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 166 | 46.1 |
| Female | 194 | 53.9 | |
| Age | 20–30 | 124 | 34.4 |
| 31–40 | 87 | 24.2 | |
| 41–50 | 83 | 23.0 | |
| 51–60 | 42 | 11.7 | |
| >60 | 24 | 6.7 | |
| Marital Status | Married with a child or children | 149 | 41.4 |
| Married | 80 | 22.2 | |
| Single | 115 | 32.0 | |
| Other | 16 | 4.4 | |
| Education | Junior school or below | 57 | 15.9 |
| High school or technical secondary school | 124 | 34.4 | |
| University or above | 179 | 49.7 | |
| Monthly Income (RMB) | <4500 | 98 | 27.2 |
| 4500–9000 | 174 | 48.3 | |
| >9000 | 88 | 24.5 | |
Measurement of constructs.
| Constructs | Items | Measurement Items | Adopted From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase Intention (PI) | PI1 | I prefer to choose green food products if they are available for purchase. | Yazdanpanah and Forouzani [ |
| PI2 | In the near future, I will try to buy green food. | ||
| Attitude (AT) | AT1 | I think purchasing green food is a good concept. | Wang et al. [ |
| AT2 | I believe buying green food is pleasant. | ||
| AT3 | I believe buying green food is of importance. | ||
| Subjective Norm (SN) | SN1 | Most people I value believe I should purchase green food. | Han et al. [ |
| SN2 | Most people I value will purchase green food rather than non-green food. | ||
| Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) | PBC1 | If I want to, I can easily buy green food. | Han et al. [ |
| PBC2 | I have all resources for buying green food. | ||
| PBC3 | Buying green food is entirely up to me. | ||
| Moral Attitude (MA) | MA1 | If I purchase green food rather than non-green food, it feels like a personal contribution to something better. | Arvola et al. [ |
| MA2 | If I purchase green food rather than non-green food, it feels like I’m doing the morally right thing. | ||
| MA3 | If I purchase green food rather than non-green food, I feel like I’m being a better person. | ||
| Health Consciousness (HC) | HC1 | I chose food carefully to ensure good health. | Yadav and Pathak [ |
| HC2 | I consider myself a health-conscious consumer. | ||
| HC3 | I often think about health-related issues. | ||
| Impact of COVID-19 (IOC) | IOC1 | I perceive the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced me personally. | Meixner and Katt [ |
| IOC2 | I perceive the COVID-19 pandemic will shift my consumption pattern. | ||
| IOC3 | I perceive the COVID-19 pandemic will change society. |
Figure 2The overview of responses (n = 360): X-axis, seven-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = somewhat disagree, 4 = neither agree nor disagree, 5 = somewhat agree, 6 = agree, 7 = strongly agree); Y-axis, number of responses; AT, attitude; SN, subjective norm; PBC, perceived behavioural control; MA, moral attitude; HC, health consciousness; IOC, impact of COVID-19; PI, purchase intention.
Reliability and validity analysis.
| Constructs | Factor Loadings | CR | SMC | AVE | Cronbach’s α | √AVE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPB | E-TPB | TPB | E-TPB | TPB | E-TPB | TPB | E-TPB | |||
| PI | 0.904 | 0.901 | 0.758 | 0.752 | 0.902 | 0.867 | ||||
| PI1 | 0.840 | 0.838 | 0.706 | 0.703 | ||||||
| PI2 | 0.870 | 0.866 | 0.757 | 0.751 | ||||||
| PI3 | 0.901 | 0.897 | 0.813 | 0.805 | ||||||
| AT | 0.893 | 0.894 | 0.738 | 0.740 | 0.888 | 0.859 | ||||
| AT1 | 0.733 | 0.743 | 0.538 | 0.553 | ||||||
| AT2 | 0.944 | 0.942 | 0.891 | 0.888 | ||||||
| AT3 | 0.887 | 0.883 | 0.786 | 0.780 | ||||||
| PBC | 0.900 | 0.900 | 0.750 | 0.750 | 0.899 | 0.866 | ||||
| PBC1 | 0.864 | 0.864 | 0.747 | 0.746 | ||||||
| PBC2 | 0.886 | 0.887 | 0.785 | 0.787 | ||||||
| PBC3 | 0.847 | 0.846 | 0.717 | 0.716 | ||||||
| SN | 0.830 | 0.834 | 0.710 | 0.716 | 0.830 | 0.843 | ||||
| SN1 | 0.826 | 0.789 | 0.682 | 0.623 | ||||||
| SN2 | 0.859 | 0.900 | 0.739 | 0.810 | ||||||
| MA | 0.841 | 0.640 | 0.849 | 0.800 | ||||||
| MA1 | 0.845 | 0.714 | ||||||||
| MA2 | 0.830 | 0.688 | ||||||||
| MA3 | 0.719 | 0.516 | ||||||||
| HC | 0.795 | 0.563 | 0.792 | 0.750 | ||||||
| HC1 | 0.778 | 0.605 | ||||||||
| HC2 | 0.737 | 0.544 | ||||||||
| HC3 | 0.736 | 0.541 | ||||||||
| IOC | 0.891 | 0.731 | 0.887 | 0.855 | ||||||
| IOC1 | 0.905 | 0.818 | ||||||||
| IOC2 | 0.844 | 0.712 | ||||||||
| IOC3 | 0.814 | 0.662 | ||||||||
Note: PI, purchase intention; AT, attitude; PBC, perceived behavioural control; SN, subjective norm; MA, moral attitude; HC, health consciousness; IOC, impact of COVID-19; CR, composite reliability; SMC, squared multiple correlation; AVE, average variance extracted; √AVE, square root of average variance extracted.
Correlation matrix for discriminant validity.
| SN | IOC | HC | MA | PBC | AT | PI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN | 0.843 | ||||||
| IOC | 0.458 | 0.855 | |||||
| HC | 0.599 | 0.569 |
| ||||
| MA | 0.755 | 0.529 |
| 0.800 | |||
| PBC | 0.670 | 0.432 | 0.561 | 0.630 | 0.866 | ||
| AT | 0.478 | 0.527 | 0.421 | 0.440 | 0.376 | 0.859 | |
| PI | 0.550 | 0.693 | 0.686 | 0.700 | 0.550 | 0.594 | 0.867 |
Note: The diagonal elements represent the square root of AVE; off-diagonal elements show the correlations between constructs; values in italics boldface indicate that values for the shared variance are larger than the square root of AVE values; SN, subjective norm; IOC, impact of COVID-19; HC, health consciousness; MA, moral attitude; PBC, perceived behavioural control; AT, attitude; PI, purchase intention.
Goodness-of-fit indices and explanatory power of two models.
| Models | χ2/df | GFI | TLI | IFI | CFI | RMSEA | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thresholds | >1 and <5 * | ≥0.9 * | ≥0.9 * | ≥0.9 * | ≥0.9 * | ≤0.08 * | |
| TPB | 2.533 | 0.956 | 0.970 | 0.980 | 0.980 | 0.065 | 0.49 |
| E-TPB | 2.870 | 0.893 | 0.938 | 0.951 | 0.950 | 0.068 | 0.68 |
Note: * Source from Bagozzi and Yi [57]; GFI, goodness-of-fit index; NFI, normative fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; CFI, comparative fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error approximation.
Hypotheses test results.
| Hypothesised Path | Standardised Estimate | Result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPB | E-TPB | TPB | E-TPB | ||
| H1: AT → PI | 0.395 | 0.237 | 7.373 *** | 4.806 *** | Support |
| H2: SN → PI | 0.188 | −0.119 | 2.498 * | −1.478 | Partly support |
| H3: PBC → PI | 0.284 | 0.122 | 4.153 *** | 2.111 * | Support |
| H4: MA → PI | 0.318 | 3.352 *** | Support | ||
| H5: HC → PI | 0.154 | 2.023 * | Support | ||
| H6: IOC → HC | 0.600 | 9.579 *** | Support | ||
| H7: IOC → PI | 0.315 | 4.950 *** | Support | ||
Note: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; AT, attitude; PI, purchase intention; SN, subjective norm; PBC, perceived behavioural control; MA, moral attitude; HC, health consciousness; IOC, impact of COVID-19.