Literature DB >> 1599603

How much physical activity is good for health?

S N Blair1, H W Kohl, N F Gordon, R S Paffenbarger.   

Abstract

Research studies over the past several decades confirm the health benefits of regular physical activity, a concept with foundations in antiquity. The effects of activity on certain individual health conditions, the precise dose of activity that is required for specific benefits, the role (if any) of intensity of effort, and the elucidation of biological pathways whereby activity contributes to health are topics for further research. Although details remain to be clarified, it is now clear that regular physical activity reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality from several chronic diseases and increases physical fitness, which leads to improved function. Table 3 outlines the relationship of activity to several diseases, a judgment on the strength of the evidence, and a rough determination of the amount of research extant. Results from clinical exercise studies and epidemiological investigations can be integrated into a consistent and coherent theory of healthful physical activity. However, some differences between these two research streams need to be reconciled. Exercise physiologists have generally recommended relatively intensive activity and a formal approach to exercise prescription. The epidemiological studies suggest a linear dose-response relationship, at least up to a point, between physical activity and health and functional effects. These data support public health recommendations directed toward the most sedentary and unfit stratum of the population and emphasize doing at least moderate physical activity. If this group of adults would accumulate 30 minutes of walking per day (or the equivalent energy expenditure in other activities), they would receive clinically significant health benefits. An important point is that it does not matter what type of physical activity is performed: Sports, planned exercise, household or yard work, or occupational tasks are all beneficial. The key factor is total energy expenditure; if that is constant, improvements in fitness and health will be comparable. There are probably 40 million adults in the US whose sedentary habits place them at considerably increased risk of morbidity and mortality from several diseases. These same individuals also are more likely to have functional limitations, especially as they move into the later years of life. The sizable independent relative risk for impaired health in sedentary persons, and the large number at risk, leads to a substantial public health burden. This problem deserves continued and increased attention by physicians and other health professionals, scientists, and the public health establishment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1599603     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.000531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  69 in total

1.  Randomised, controlled walking trials in postmenopausal women: the minimum dose to improve aerobic fitness?

Authors:  T-M Asikainen; S Miilunpalo; P Oja; M Rinne; M Pasanen; K Uusi-Rasi; I Vuori
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors:  R Artal; M O'Toole
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Lifestyle patterns concerning sports and physical activity, and perceptions of health.

Authors:  Claire Perrin; Christine Ferron; René Gueguen; Jean-Pierre Deschamps
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Exercise training: can it improve cardiovascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  K J Stewart
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Couch kids: correlates of television viewing among youth.

Authors:  Trish Gorely; Simon J Marshall; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

6.  Exercise and dietary modification with women of non-English speaking background: a pilot study with Polish-Australian women.

Authors:  W J Brown; C Lee
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1994

7.  Internal consistency and validity of a new physical workload questionnaire.

Authors:  S D M Bot; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; A Feleus; S M Bierma-Zeinstra; D L Knol; L M Bouter; J Dekker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease in middle-aged individuals. Recommendations.

Authors:  R Rauramaa; A S Leon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Preventing osteoporosis, falls, and fractures among elderly people. Promotion of lifelong physical activity is essential.

Authors:  P Kannus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-23

10.  Development of public policy and physical activity initiatives internationally.

Authors:  S N Blair; M Booth; I Gyarfas; H Iwane; B Marti; V Matsudo; M S Morrow; T Noakes; R Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.