| Literature DB >> 30925666 |
Haroon Qasim1, Liang Yan2, Rui Guo3, Amer Saeed4, Badar Nadeem Ashraf5,6.
Abstract
Consumption values and self-identity are the essential antecedents of consumer sustainable behavior. By integrating the theory of consumption values and self-identity approach, this research explores the relationship among consumption values (functional, social, conditional, epistemic and emotional), environmental self-identity and the behavioral intention to consume organic food. The data was collected from 406 organic food consumers through a structured questionnaire in Lahore (Pakistan). Using the PLS-SEM approach, we find that conditional value, emotional value, epistemic value, and functional value quality have a significant positive influence on consumers' behavioral intention to consume organic food. We further find that environmental self-identity significantly mediates the structural relationship between consumption values and the behavioral intention to consume organic food. Our results imply that the interventions targeting environmental self-identity are a promising way to promote sustainable consumption behavior. Our findings also have important implications for the development of the organic food market based on consumption values and self-identities.Entities:
Keywords: behavioral intention; consumption values; environmental self-identity; organic food
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30925666 PMCID: PMC6479335 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Conceptual framework.
Figure 2Distribution of samples.
Demographic profile of participants.
| Constructs | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 246 | 60.6 | |
| Female | 160 | 39.4 | |
| Age (years) | |||
| 18–24 | 166 | 40.9 | |
| 25–35 | 171 | 42.1 | |
| 36–45 | 55 | 13.5 | |
| Above 45 | 14 | 3.45 | |
| Education | |||
| High School or less | 26 | 6.5 | |
| Diploma holders | 40 | 10.0 | |
| Intermediate | 69 | 17.0 | |
| Undergraduate | 124 | 30.5 | |
| Master or Above | 145 | 36.0 | |
| Occupation | |||
| Student | 136 | 33.5 | |
| Government employee | 62 | 15.3 | |
| Company employee | 137 | 33.7 | |
| Business owner | 20 | 4.9 | |
| Housewife | 20 | 4.9 | |
| Professionals | 31 | 7.6 | |
| Income (PKRs = Pakistani rupees) | <PKRs 50,000 | 117 | 28.8 |
| PKRs 50,001–PKRs 100,000 | 134 | 33.0 | |
| PKRs 100,001–PKRs 150,000 | 77 | 19.0 | |
| PKRs 150,001–PKRs 200,000 | 50 | 12.3 | |
| PKRs 200,001–PKRs 250,000 | 19 | 4.7 | |
| > PKRs 250,000 | 9 | 2.2 |
Reliability and validity for constructs.
| Constructs | Statements | Loadings | (CR) | (AVE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Function value price | ||||
| The organic food product is reasonably priced. | 0.757 | 0.849 | 0.653 | |
| The organic food product offer value for money. | 0.835 | |||
| The organic food product has a good economic value. | 0.828 | |||
| Function value quality | ||||
| The organic food product has expectable standard quality. | 0.835 | 0.868 | 0.687 | |
| The organic food product is made from non-hazardous substances. | 0.835 | |||
| Taste of organic food is good. | 0.817 | |||
| Social Value | ||||
| Purchase of organic food product will help me gain social approval. | 0.760 | 0.847 | 0.649 | |
| Purchase of organic food product will make a positive impression on other people. | 0.862 | |||
| Purchase of organic food product will improve the way I am perceived | 0.790 | |||
| Conditional Value | ||||
| I would buy organic food products if they were easy to acquire (accessible nearby). | 0.832 | 0.869 | 0.688 | |
| I would buy the organic food product instead of conventional products under worsening environmental conditions. | 0.817 | |||
| I will purchase organic food products over conventional substitutes if they are offered at a subsidized rate. | 0.839 | |||
| Epistemic Value | ||||
| I prefer to check the eco-labels and certifications on organic food products before purchase. | 0.830 | 0.840 | 0.636 | |
| I would prefer to gain substantial information on organic food products before purchase. | 0.814 | |||
| I am willing to seek out novel information. | 0.746 | |||
| Emotional Value | ||||
| Buying the organic food product instead of conventional products would feel like making a good personal contribution to something better. | 0.799 | 0.839 | 0.636 | |
| Buying the organic food product instead of conventional products would feel like the morally right thing. | 0.839 | |||
| Buying the organic food product instead of conventional products would make me feel like a better person. | 0.750 | |||
| Environmental Self-identity | ||||
| Acting environmental friendly is an important part of who I am. | 0.778 | 0.863 | 0.612 | |
| I am the type of person who acts environmental friendly. | 0.799 | |||
| I see myself as an environmental-friendly person. | 0.827 | |||
| I make significant changes in my lifestyle for environmental reasons | 0.720 | |||
| Behavioral Intention | ||||
| Given a choice between two substitute products, I intend to choose an organic food product in the future | 0.804 | 0.835 | 0.560 | |
| I am always interested in buying more organic food products for the family’s needs. | 0.806 | |||
| I will make a special effort to consume organic food product. | 0.729 | |||
| Given that organic food products are readily available, I predict that I would use them in the future. | 0.644 | |||
| Health consciousness | ||||
| I am very self-conscious about my health. | 0.853 | 0.851 | 0.656 | |
| I am alert to changes in my health. | 0.836 | |||
| I consume organic food as it considers good for health. | 0.737 |
Notes: AVE: average variance extracted, CR: composite reliability.
Discriminant Validity.
| Fornell-Larcker’s (1981) Criterion | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI | CV | EMO | EPV | ESI | FVP | FVQ | HC | SV | |
| Behavioral Intention | 0.749 | ||||||||
| Conditional value | 0.475 | 0.829 | |||||||
| Emotional value | 0.471 | 0.403 | 0.797 | ||||||
| Epistemic value | 0.334 | 0.291 | 0.362 | 0.798 | |||||
| Environmental self-identity | 0.415 | 0.357 | 0.371 | 0.364 | 0.782 | ||||
| Functional value price | 0.169 | 0.111 | 0.175 | 0.063 | 0.095 | 0.808 | |||
| Functional value quality | 0.375 | 0.323 | 0.277 | 0.187 | 0.346 | 0.338 | 0.829 | ||
| Health consciousness | 0.443 | 0.275 | 0.197 | 0.135 | 0.389 | 0.175 | 0.297 | 0.810 | |
| Social value | 0.330 | 0.274 | 0.401 | 0.196 | 0.264 | 0.245 | 0.348 | 0.296 | 0.805 |
| Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) | |||||||||
| Behavioral Intention | |||||||||
| Conditional value | 0.622 | ||||||||
| Emotional value | 0.636 | 0.533 | |||||||
| Epistemic value | 0.462 | 0.394 | 0.498 | ||||||
| Environmental self-identity | 0.545 | 0.454 | 0.486 | 0.480 | |||||
| Functional value price | 0.224 | 0.140 | 0.240 | 0.103 | 0.121 | ||||
| Functional value quality | 0.481 | 0.420 | 0.374 | 0.250 | 0.442 | 0.438 | |||
| Health consciousness | 0.595 | 0.365 | 0.275 | 0.188 | 0.509 | 0.238 | 0.388 | ||
| Social value | 0.442 | 0.362 | 0.549 | 0.255 | 0.337 | 0.343 | 0.456 | 0.413 | |
FVP = functional value price, FVQ = functional value quality, SV = social value, CV = conditional value, EPV = epistemic value, EMO = emotional value, ESI = Environmental Self-identity, HC = Health consciousness, BI = behavioral intention to purchase organic food.
Structural estimates (Hypotheses testing).
| Hypothesized Path | t-Value |
| Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1a: Functional value price—Behavioral intention | 0.021 | 0.486 | 0.001 | Not supported |
| H1b: Functional value quality—Behavioral intention | 0.169 | 3.286 ** | 0.036 | Supported |
| H2: Social value—Behavioral intention | 0.072 | 1.42 | 0.006 | Not supported |
| H3: Conditional value—Behavioral intention | 0.269 | 5.443 ** | 0.089 | Supported |
| H4: Epistemic Value—Behavioral intention | 0.125 | 2.420 ** | 0.021 | Supported |
| H5: Emotional value—Behavioral intention | 0.240 | 5.082 ** | 0.064 | Supported |
Notes: ** p ≤ 0.01.
Specific indirect effect.
| Hypothesized Path | β-Value | t-Value | Confidence Interval | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.007 | 0.853 | [−0.023; 0.005] N-sig | Not supported | |
| 0.031 | 2.266 ** | [0.010; 0.055] Sig | Supported | |
| 0.008 | 0.871 | [−0.003; 0.027] N-sig | Not supported | |
| 0.022 | 1.635 * | [0.004; 0.049] Sig | Supported | |
| 0.032 | 2.241 ** | [0.011; 0.057] Sig | Supported | |
| 0.024 | 1.680 * | [0.005; 0.051] Sig | Supported |
Note: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01, FVP = functional value price, FVQ = functional value quality, SV = social value, CV = conditional value, EPV = epistemic value, EMO = emotional value, ESI = Environmental Self-identity, BI = behavioral intention to purchase organic food.