Literature DB >> 31741833

Initial Single-Institution Experience With a Novel Robotic-Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw and Pelvic Screw Placement With 643 Screws.

Deeptee Jain1, Jordan Manning1, Elizabeth Lord1, Themistocles Protopsaltis1, Yong Kim1, Aaron J Buckland1, John Bendo1, Charla Fischer1, Jeffrey Goldstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic-guided navigation systems for pedicle screw placement has gained recent interest to ensure accuracy and safety and diminish radiation exposure. There have been no published studies using a new combined robotics and navigation system (Globus ExcelsiusGPS system). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate safety with this system.
METHODS: This is a case series of consecutive patients at a single institution from February 1, 2018, to August 31, 2018. All patients who had planned placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws using the combined robotics-navigation system were included. Chart review was performed for operative details. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to assess screw placement accuracy using the Gertzbein and Robbins system. Acceptable pedicle screw position was defined as grade A or B.
RESULTS: One hundred six patients were included, with 636 pedicle screws, 6 iliac screws, and 1 S2AI screw. Five cases were aborted for technical issues. In the remaining 101 patients, 88 patients had screws placed using preoperative CT planning and 13 patients using intraoperative fluoroscopy planning. All screws except for 5 pedicle screws in 2 patients were placed successfully using the robot (99%). These 5 pedicle screws were placed by converting to a fluoro-guided technique without robotic assistance. Eighty-six patients had screws placed using a percutaneous technique, and 15 patients had screws placed using an open technique. Ninety-eight patients underwent interbody placement: 28 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 12 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 58 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). All ALIFs and LLIFs were performed prior to placement of the screws. Four LIF patients had screws placed in the lateral position. No patients had screw-related complications intraoperatively or postoperatively, and no patients returned to the operating room for screw revision. Thirteen patients underwent postoperative CT for various reasons. Of the 66 pedicle screws that were examined with postoperative CT, all screws (100%) had acceptable position.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the combined robotics and navigation system is a novel technology that can be utilized to place pedicle screws and pelvic screws safely and has the potential to reduce screw-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (case series). ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; navigation; pedicle screw placement; robotics; screw accuracy; spine surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741833      PMCID: PMC6833964          DOI: 10.14444/6060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  12 in total

1.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  John M Hicks; Amit Singla; Francis H Shen; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Rajeev Verma; Sonal Krishan; Kurt Haendlmayer; A Mohsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Sean S Rajaee; Hyun W Bae; Linda E A Kanim; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacob R Joseph; Brandon W Smith; Xilin Liu; Paul Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

Authors:  S D Gertzbein; S E Robbins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; Maryse Fortin; Rainer Figueiredo; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Naureen Keric; Christian Doenitz; Amer Haj; Izabela Rachwal-Czyzewicz; Mirjam Renovanz; Dominik M A Wesp; Stephan Boor; Jens Conrad; Alexander Brawanski; Alf Giese; Sven R Kantelhardt
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo Amato; Luigi Giannachi; Claudio Irace; Claudio Corona
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-03
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.

Authors:  John A Buza; Jeffrey L Gum; Christopher R Good; Ronald A Lehman; John Pollina; Richard V Chua; Avery L Buchholz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-09-28

2.  Workflow and Efficiency of Robotic-Assisted Navigation in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fedan Avrumova; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Ram Kiran Alluri; Avani Vaishnav; Sheeraz Qureshi; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-06-29

3.  Robotic-assisted percutaneous iliac screw fixation for destructive lumbosacral metastatic lesions: an early single-institution experience.

Authors:  Christine Park; Clifford Crutcher; Vikram A Mehta; Timothy Y Wang; Khoi D Than; Isaac O Karikari; C Rory Goodwin; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.

Authors:  Meng Huang; Tyler A Tetreault; Avani Vaishnav; Philip J York; Blake N Staub
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

5.  Initial Intraoperative Experience with Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement with Cirq® Robotic Alignment: An Evaluation of the First 70 Screws.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Miriam Bopp; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl; Benjamin Saβ
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.