Literature DB >> 20473117

Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review.

John M Hicks1, Amit Singla, Francis H Shen, Vincent Arlet.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on the use of pedicle screws in pediatric spinal deformity to quantify the risks and complications associated with pedicle screw instrumentation, particularly in the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of pedicle screws in adolescent scoliosis surgery is common. Although many reports have been published regarding the use of pedicle screws in pediatric patients, there has been no systematic review on the risks of complications.
METHODS: PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting the use of thoracic pedicle screws in pediatric deformity. We excluded articles dealing with neuromuscular scoliosis or bone dysplasia to focus mostly on adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis and the likes. We then searched for cases reports dealing with thoracic pedicle screws complications.
RESULTS: This systematic review retrieved 21 studies with a total of 4570 pedicle screws in 1666 patients. The mean age of the patients was 17.6 years; 812 patients were women and 252 were men, and 5 studies did not identify sex. Overall, 518 (4.2%) screws were reported as malpositioned. However, in studies in which postoperative computed tomography scans were done systematically, the rate of screw malpositioning was as high as 15.7%. The reported percentage of patients with screw malpositioned is around 11%. Eleven patients underwent revision surgery for instrumentation malposition. Other complications reported include loss of curve correction, intraoperative pedicle fracture or loosening, dural laceration, deep infection, pseudarthrosis, and transient neurologic injury. There were no major vascular complications reported in these 21 studies. We could identify 9 case report articles dealing with complications of pedicle screws. Such complications were mostly either vascular (10 cases) or neurologic (4 cases), without any irreversible complications.
CONCLUSION: Malposition is the most commonly reported complication of thoracic pedicle screw placement, at a rate of 15.7% per screw inserted with postoperative computed tomography scans. The use of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine for the treatment of pediatric deformity has been reported to be safe despite the high rate of patients with malpositioned screws (11%). Major complications, such as neurologic or vascular injury, were almost never reported in this literature review of case series. Cases reports on the other hand have started to identify such complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473117     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1021a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  111 in total

Review 1.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in the treatment of non-degenerative scoliosis by posterior instrumentation and fusion.

Authors:  Yunsheng Wang; Yong Hai; Yuzeng Liu; Li Guan; Tie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reversing the concept: correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the convex rod de-rotation maneuver.

Authors:  Yoram Anekstein; Yigal Mirovsky; Vitaly Arnabitsky; Yael Gelfer; Ira Zaltz; Yossi Smorgick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Are computer numerical control (CNC)-manufactured patient-specific metal templates available for posterior thoracic pedicle screw insertion? Feasibility and accuracy evaluation.

Authors:  Xiangxue Kong; Lei Tang; Qiang Ye; Wenhua Huang; Jianyi Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pedicle screw instrumentation and spinal deformities: have we gone too far?

Authors:  John McCormick; Max Aebi; David Toby; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Safwan Alomari; Ryan Planchard; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Timothy Witham; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  [Characteristics of neuromuscular scoliosis].

Authors:  M Putzier; C Groß; R K Zahn; M Pumberger; P Strube
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.