Literature DB >> 34129101

Robotic-assisted percutaneous iliac screw fixation for destructive lumbosacral metastatic lesions: an early single-institution experience.

Christine Park1, Clifford Crutcher1, Vikram A Mehta1, Timothy Y Wang1, Khoi D Than1, Isaac O Karikari1, C Rory Goodwin1, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery is becoming more widely applied in surgical subspecialties due to its intraoperative and postoperative advantages such as minimally invasive approach, reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and decreased incidence of postoperative complications. However, robotic devices were only recently introduced in the field of spinal surgery. Specifically, percutaneous approaches involving computer-assisted image guidance are relatively new in iliac screw fixation. Previous methods focused on the use of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation which allows for pelvic fixation without a need for side connectors. However, for patients with destructive lesions of the sacrum, placement of these S2AI screws may not be feasible. The purpose of this technical note is to illustrate the implementation of robotic-assisted percutaneous iliac screw fixation in two cases which allows for minimally invasive attachment to the proximal lumbar screws without a side connector and eliminates a potential source of instrumentation failure.
METHODS: Robotic-assisted percutaneous iliac screw fixation was performed on two patients. The robotics system was used to merge the fluoroscopic images with intraoperative computed tomography (CT) images to plan the trajectories for placement of bilateral pedicle and iliac screws. Intraoperative CT scan was again performed to confirm proper placement of all screws. Rods were then engaged bilaterally with the pedicle and iliac screws without the use of side connectors.
RESULTS: The patients did not experience immediate postoperative complications and had stable hardware at one-month follow-up. Our cases demonstrate the surgical efficiency of robotic-assisted lumbo-iliac instrumentation which obviates the need to use a side connector, which is commonly used in iliac fixation. This eliminates a step, which can reduce the possibility of instrumentation failure.
CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted percutaneous iliac screw fixation is a safe and feasible technique to improve operative and clinical outcomes in complex spinal instrumentation surgeries.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Iliac screw fixation; Metastatic lesions; Robot

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34129101     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04894-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.816


  12 in total

Review 1.  Iliac bolt fixation: an anatomic approach.

Authors:  James S Harrop; Shiveindra B Jeyamohan; Ashwini Sharan; John Ratliff; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-12

2.  Iliac screw fixation using computer-assisted computer tomographic image guidance: technical note.

Authors:  John H Shin; Daniel J Hoh; Iain H Kalfas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Sacropelvic Fixation: When, Why, How?

Authors:  Joseph M Lombardi; Jamal N Shillingford; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Fluoroscopy time analysis of a prospective, multi-centre study comparing robotic- and fluoroscopic-guided placement of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation for short segment minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Aria M Jamshidi; Dustin H Massel; Jason I Liounakos; Zmira Silman; Christopher R Good; Samuel R Schroerlucke; Andrew Cannestra; Victor Hsu; Jae Lim; Faissal Zahrawi; Pedro M Ramirez; Thomas M Sweeney; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Surgical treatment of sacral metastases: indications and results.

Authors:  Iman Feiz-Erfan; Benjamin D Fox; Remi Nader; Dima Suki; Indro Chakrabarti; Ehud Mendel; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ganesh Rao; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-08-17

6.  Initial Single-Institution Experience With a Novel Robotic-Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw and Pelvic Screw Placement With 643 Screws.

Authors:  Deeptee Jain; Jordan Manning; Elizabeth Lord; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Yong Kim; Aaron J Buckland; John Bendo; Charla Fischer; Jeffrey Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 7.  Technologic Evolution of Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer Z Mao; Justice O Agyei; Asham Khan; Ryan M Hess; Patrick K Jowdy; Jeffrey P Mullin; John Pollina
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Sven Rainer Kantelhardt; Ramon Martinez; Stefan Baerwinkel; Ralf Burger; Alf Giese; Veit Rohde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A systematic review of the current role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the management of metastatic spine disease.

Authors:  Camilo A Molina; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Placement of Pedicle Screws - New Applications for Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Multi-Surgeon, Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Troy Q Tabarestani; David Sykes; Kelly R Murphy; Timothy Y Wang; Christopher I Shaffrey; C Rory Goodwin; Phillip Horne; Khoi D Than; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.