Literature DB >> 31696954

Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Josie A Elwell1, George S Athwal2, Ryan Willing1,3.   

Abstract

Active range of motion (ROM) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be limited by bony impingement, muscle inability, and joint instability. The aim of this study was to develop a novel metric representative of comprehensive ROM of rTSA, which is evaluated in the context of all three factors. It was hypothesized that the metric, termed global circumduction ROM (GC-ROM), would capture differences resulting from directional changes in rTSA design parameters known to increase ROM. GC-ROM was calculated for a set of 18 rTSA configurations with humeral polyethylene cup depths of 6 and 8.1 mm, glenosphere lateralization (GLat) distances of 0, 5, and 10 mm, and neck-shaft angles (NSA) of 135°, 145°, and 155°. For any implant configuration, arm positions were defined by internal/external (IE) rotation angle and two spherical coordinates representing the elevation plane angle and elevation angle. At each IE rotation angle, incremental positions with variable elevation plane and elevation angles were checked for feasibility based on impingement, muscle ability, and risk of instability. Coordinates of feasible positions were mapped to unit spheres and connected to form regions, of which the surface area was calculated to represent allowable circumduction ROM. ROMs were averaged across all IE rotation angles to produce a single metric, GC-ROM. The results showed that decreasing cup depth and increasing GLat and NSA increased GC-ROM. In conclusion, a novel metric to characterize comprehensive ROM, evaluated based on several ROM-limiting factors, was developed as a performance metric through which rTSA designs can be compared.
© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:880-887, 2020. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant design; range of motion; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31696954      PMCID: PMC7071975          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  40 in total

1.  Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg; Andrew E Anderson; Kent N Bachus; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Jonathan C Levy; Mark A Frankle; Derek Cuff; Tony S Keller; Derek R Pupello; William E Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Charles A Comiskey; Zong-Ping Luo; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The biomechanics of reverse anatomy shoulder replacement--a modelling study.

Authors:  A Kontaxis; G R Johnson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg; Andrew E Anderson; Kent N Bachus; Robert Z Tashjian; Robert T Burks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Jean Chaoui; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Comparing daily shoulder motion and frequency after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; John P Haverstock; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.

Authors:  J Berhouet; P Garaud; L Favard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Development and validation of a muscle wrapping model applied to intact and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty shoulders.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Maximizing range of motion of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using design optimization techniques.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; George Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.789

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.