Literature DB >> 24211248

Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.

J Berhouet1, P Garaud, L Favard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common disadvantage of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is limitation of the range of arm rotation. Several changes to the prosthesis design and implantation technique have been suggested to improve rotation range of motion (ROM). HYPOTHESIS: Glenoid component design and degree of humeral component retroversion influence rotation ROM after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Aequalis Reversed™ shoulder prosthesis (Tornier Inc., Edina, MN, USA) was implanted into 40 cadaver shoulders. Eight glenoid component combinations were tested, five with the 36-mm sphere (centred seating, eccentric seating, inferior tilt, centred with a 5-mm thick lateralised spacer, and centred with a 7-mm thick lateralised spacer) and three with the 42-mm sphere (centred with no spacer or with a 7-mm or 10-mm spacer). Humeral component position was evaluated with 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° of retroversion. External and internal rotation ROMs to posterior and anterior impingement on the scapular neck were measured with the arm in 20° of abduction.
RESULTS: The large glenosphere (42 mm) was associated with significantly (P<0.05) greater rotation ROMs, particularly when combined with a lateralised spacer (46° internal and 66° external rotation). Rotation ROMs were smallest with the 36-mm sphere. Greater humeral component retroversion was associated with a decrease in internal rotation and a significant increase (P<0.05) in external rotation. The best balance between rotation ROMs was obtained with the native retroversion, which was estimated at 17.5° on average in this study. DISCUSSION: Our anatomic study in a large number of cadavers involved a detailed and reproducible experimental protocol. However, we did not evaluate the variability in scapular anatomy. Earlier studies of the influence of technical parameters did not take humeral component retroversion into account. In addition, no previous studies assessed rotation ROMs.
CONCLUSION: Rotation ROM should be improved by the use of a large-diameter glenosphere with a spacer to lateralise the centre of rotation of the gleno-humeral joint, as well as by positioning the humeral component at the patient's native retroversion value.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid component combinations; Humeral component retroversion; Reverse shoulder prosthesis; Rotations

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211248     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  18 in total

1.  Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; G Daniel G Langohr; Matthew Mahaffy; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

7.  Preoperative external rotation deficit does not predict poor outcomes or lack of improvement after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moby Parsons; Howard D Routman; Christopher P Roche; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-22

8.  Should the supraspinatus tendon be excised in the case of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture?

Authors:  Nicolas Bonnevialle; Xavier Ohl; Philippe Clavert; Luc Favard; Anne Frégeac; Laurent Obert; Christophe Chantelot; David Gallinet; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 9.  [Irreparable rotator cuff tears. Debridement, partial reconstruction, tendon transfer or reversed shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  Th Patzer; M Hufeland; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Reverse total shoulder versus angular stable plate treatment for proximal humeral fractures in over 65 years old patients.

Authors:  Antonio Giardella; Francesco Ascione; Mattia Mocchi; Marco Berlusconi; Alfonso Maria Romano; Francesco Oliva; Leonardo Maradei
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.