Literature DB >> 28528016

The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Birgit S Werner1, Jean Chaoui2, Gilles Walch3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have focused on changes in several design-related parameters, including humeral component design, to allow for easier convertibility. Alterations in humeral inclination and offset on shoulder kinematics may have a relevant influence on postoperative outcome. This study used a virtual computer simulation to evaluate the influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in onlay design RSA.
METHODS: Three-dimensional RSA computer templating was created from computed tomography (CT) scans in 20 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A1). Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free range of motion: humeral inclination (135° vs. 145°) and glenoid lateralization (0 mm vs. 5 mm).
RESULTS: Decreasing the humeral neck shaft angle demonstrated a significant increase in impingement-free range of motion. Compared to the 145° configuration, extension was increased by 42.3° (-8.5° to 73.5°), adduction by 15° (10° to 23°), and external rotation with the arm at side by 15.1° (8.5° to 26.5°); however, abduction was decreased by 6.5° (-1° to 12.5°). Glenoid lateralization led to comparable results, but an additional increase in abduction of 7.6° (-1° to 16.5°) and forward flexion of 26.6° (6.5° to 62°) was observed.
CONCLUSION: Lower humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization are effective for improvement in range of motion after RSA. The use of the 135° model with 5 mm of glenoid lateralization provided the best results in impingement-free range of motion, except for abduction.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; humeral inclination; impingement; onlay design; preoperative planning; range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528016     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  33 in total

1.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Exposure of the brachial plexus in complex revisions to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Filippo Familiari; Amrut U Borade; Jacob Joseph; E Gene Deune; Jack V Ingari; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis; Riccardo Ranieri; Alessio Palumbo; Michele Paciotti; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Radiographic parameters associated with excellent versus poor range of motion outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georges Haidamous; Alexandre Lädermann; Robert U Hartzler; Bradford O Parsons; Evan S Lederman; John M Tokish; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 6.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Technique, Decision-Making and Exposure Tips.

Authors:  Harshvardhan Chawla; Seth Gamradt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

7.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 8.  Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Authors:  Richard Dimock; Mohamed Fathi Elabd; Mohamed Imam; Mark Middleton; Arnaud Godenèche; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-06-02

9.  The effect of glenoid lateralization and glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on deltoid load: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Arad Alikah; Michael Hackl; Dominik Seybold; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.