Literature DB >> 21530322

Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Heath B Henninger1, Alexej Barg, Andrew E Anderson, Kent N Bachus, Robert Z Tashjian, Robert T Burks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No clear recommendations exist regarding optimal humeral component version and deltoid tension in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A biomechanical shoulder simulator tested humeral versions (0°, 10°, 20° retroversion) and implant thicknesses (-3, 0, +3 mm from baseline) after reverse TSA in human cadavers. Abduction and external rotation ranges of motion as well as abduction and dislocation forces were quantified for native arms and arms implanted with 9 combinations of humeral version and implant thickness.
RESULTS: Resting abduction angles increased significantly (up to 30°) after reverse TSA compared with native shoulders. With constant posterior cuff loads, native arms externally rotated 20°, whereas no external rotation occurred in implanted arms (20° net internal rotation). Humeral version did not affect rotational range of motion but did alter resting abduction. Abduction forces decreased 30% vs native shoulders but did not change when version or implant thickness was altered. Humeral center of rotation was shifted 17 mm medially and 12 mm inferiorly after implantation. The force required for lateral dislocation was 60% less than anterior and was not affected by implant thickness or version.
CONCLUSION: Reverse TSA reduced abduction forces compared with native shoulders and resulted in limited external rotation and abduction ranges of motion. Because abduction force was reduced for all implants, the choice of humeral version and implant thickness should focus on range of motion. Lateral dislocation forces were less than anterior forces; thus, levering and inferior/posterior impingement may be a more probable basis for dislocation (laterally) than anteriorly directed forces. Copyright Â
© 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530322     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  24 in total

1.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Optimal positioning of the humeral component in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  L Nalbone; R Adelfio; M D'Arienzo; T Ingrassia; V Nigrelli; F Zabbara; P Paladini; F Campi; A Pellegrini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-30

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

6.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

8.  Preoperative deltoid size and fatty infiltration of the deltoid and rotator cuff correlate to outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brett P Wiater; Denise M Koueiter; Tristan Maerz; James E Moravek; Samuel Yonan; David R Marcantonio; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.