Literature DB >> 31693453

Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.

Seah Chang1, Howard E Egeth1.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that observers can suppress salient-but-irrelevant stimuli in a top-down manner. However, one question left unresolved is whether such suppression is, in fact, solely due to distractor-feature suppression or whether it instead also reflects some degree of target-feature enhancement. The present study (N = 60) addressed this issue. On search trials (70% of trials), participants searched for a shape target when an irrelevant color singleton was either present or absent; performance was better when a color singleton was present. On interleaved probe trials (30% of trials), participants searched for a letter target. Responses were faster for the letter on a target-colored item than on a neutral-colored item, whereas responses were slower for the letter on a distractor-colored item than on a neutral-colored item. The results demonstrate that target-feature enhancement and distractor-feature suppression contribute to attentional guidance independently; enhancement and suppression flexibly guide attention as the occasion demands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; enhancement; salience; suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31693453     DOI: 10.1177/0956797619878813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

1.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features.

Authors:  Hansol Rheem; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Authors:  Owen J Adams; Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Olivier Renaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-12

6.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Standing out in a small crowd: The role of display size in attracting attention.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Ernst Niebur; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-09-28

9.  No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-22

10.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.