Literature DB >> 34707459

Standing out in a small crowd: The role of display size in attracting attention.

Seah Chang1, Ernst Niebur1,2, Howard E Egeth1,2,3.   

Abstract

Strong evidence supporting the top-down modulation of attention has come from studies in which participants learned to suppress a singleton in a heterogeneous four-item display. These studies have been criticized on the grounds that the displays are so sparse that the singleton is not actually salient. We argue that similar evidence of suppression has been found with substantially larger displays where salience is not in question. Additionally, we examine the results of applying salience models to four-item displays, and find prominent markers of salience at the location of the singleton. We conclude that small heterogeneous displays do not preclude strong salience signals. Beyond that, we reflect on how further basic research on salience may speed resolution of the attentional capture debate.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34707459      PMCID: PMC8545270          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1918810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  14 in total

Review 1.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Local processes in preattentive feature detection.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; John J McDonald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

7.  Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the PD with Small Search Displays.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Nicolas Burra
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  "Where" and "what" in vision.

Authors:  D Sagi; B Julesz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Progress and Remaining Issues: A Response to the Commentaries on.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-09-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.