Literature DB >> 36094666

Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

Dirk Kerzel1, Olivier Renaud2.   

Abstract

Visual attention is often inadvertently captured by salient stimuli. It was suggested that it is possible to prevent attentional capture in some search tasks by suppressing salient stimuli below baseline. Evidence for attentional suppression comes from a probe task that was interleaved with the main search task. In the probe task of Gaspelin et al. (Psychol Sci 26(11):1740-1750, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913 ), letters were shown on the stimuli of the search display and participants had to identify as many letters as possible. Performance was found to be worse for letters shown on the distractor compared to non-salient non-target stimuli, suggesting that distractor processing was suppressed below baseline. However, it is unclear whether suppression occurred at the level of perception or decision-making because participants may have reported letters on the distractor less frequently than letters on nontargets. This decision-level bias may have degraded performance for letters on distractor compared to nontarget stimuli without changing perception. After replicating the original findings, we conducted two experiments where we avoided report bias by cueing only a single letter for report. We found that the difference between distractor and nontarget stimuli was strongly reduced, suggesting that decision-level processes contribute to attentional suppression. In contrast, the difference between target and non-target stimuli was unchanged, suggesting that it reflected perceptual-level enhancement of the target stimuli.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36094666     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01734-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  Noise exclusion in spatial attention.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

2.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-02-18

6.  Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.

Authors:  Shai Danziger; Robert Rafal
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-01-03

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.