Literature DB >> 31680736

Independent restoration of femoral and acetabular height reduces limb length discrepancy and improves reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty.

Jonathan Warnock1, Janet Hill1, Lee Humphreys1, Nicola Gallagher1, Richard Napier1, David Beverland1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restoration of native hip biomechanics is viewed as a key intra-operative goal in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) can aid in the restoration of acetabular height and offset, and a calliper can be utilised to restore femoral height and offset. This study aimed to determine how these techniques affected the incidence of patient perception of limb length discrepancy (LLD), and if restoration of native biomechanics correlated with improved patient outcomes.
METHODS: 123 patients were questioned regarding perception of LLD at 6 weeks and 1 year following THA. Oxford hip score (OHS) and pain scores were recorded. Radiographs were analysed by a blinded clinician who measured three variables; Global hip height (surrogate for limb length), global offset and the combination of both. These measurements were then compared to the unaffected contralateral hip. Data were analysed based on hips that were restored to within ≤±10 mm of native values, and those >±10 mm. Spearman's rank test was used to assess correlation with outcome.
RESULTS: 8 (6.5%) patients perceived a LLD at 6 weeks, reducing to 3 (2.4%) at 1 year-lower than generally reported. Those patients not restored within ±10 mm of native global height had increased pain at 1 year (r = 0.558, p = 0.047). Those not restored within ±10 mm native global offset had a poorer OHS at 1 year (r = -0.586, p = 0.035) and those patients with combined height and offset discrepancy >±10 mm had both a worse OHS (r = -0.581, p = 0.037) and increased pain (r = 0.783, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Patient perception of LLD is complex and relates poorly to radiographic measurement, however, patients not restored to within 10 mm of native hip height and offset have demonstrated poorer outcomes.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global hip height; Global offset; Limb length discrepancy; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31680736      PMCID: PMC6818382          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  24 in total

1.  The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability.

Authors:  H A P Archbold; B Mockford; D Molloy; J McConway; L Ogonda; D Beverland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-07

2.  Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Aravind S Desai; Asterios Dramis; Tim N Board
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

3.  Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William B Kurtz; Timo M Ecker; William M Reichmann; Stephen B Murphy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; J A Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Do Patients' Perceptions of Leg Length Correlate With Standing 2- and 3-Dimensional Radiographic Imaging?

Authors:  Jean Y Lazennec; Adrien Brusson; Marc A Rousseau; Christopher B Robbins; Aidin Eslam Pour
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Konyves; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

7.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Additive Influence of Hip Offset and Leg Length Reconstruction on Postoperative Improvement in Clinical Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz M Innmann; Michael W Maier; Marcus R Streit; George Grammatopoulos; Thomas Bruckner; Tobias Gotterbarm; Christian Merle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 222 patients.

Authors:  Sarwar S Mahmood; Sebastian S Mukka; Sead Crnalic; Per Wretenberg; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Jianping Xiong; Peipei Wang; Shibai Zhu; Wenting Qi; Huiming Peng; Lingjia Yu; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  2 in total

1.  Low dislocation rates with the use of patient specific "Safe zones" in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abhinav K Sharma; Zlatan Cizmic; Douglas A Dennis; Stefan W Kreuzer; Michael A Miranda; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-21

2.  Restoring global offset and lower limb length with a 3 offset option double-tapered stem.

Authors:  Stefano Biggi; Lorenzo Banci; Riccardo Tedino; Andrea Capuzzo; Gabriele Cattaneo; Stefano Tornago; Andrea Camera
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.