Literature DB >> 27235329

Do Patients' Perceptions of Leg Length Correlate With Standing 2- and 3-Dimensional Radiographic Imaging?

Jean Y Lazennec1, Adrien Brusson2, Marc A Rousseau3, Christopher B Robbins4, Aidin Eslam Pour4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared 2- and 3-dimensional (2D and 3D) radiographic measurements of anatomical and functional leg length and knee coronal and sagittal alignments and correlated these measurements with patients' leg-length perceptions.
METHODS: Patients without symptomatic spinal pathology, previous surgery of the spine, and lower extremities (140 lower extremities) were evaluated on EOS images obtained in standing position. Numerous measurements of each limb were compared to the contralateral limb. All 2D/3D measures were evaluated and compared for repeatability and reproducibility.
RESULTS: Mean 2D functional and anatomical lengths were 78.7 cm (64.7-88.4, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 77.4-80) and 78.3 cm (64.9-87.9, CI 95%: 77-79.6), respectively. Mean 3D functional and anatomical lengths were 78.9 cm (65.1-88.7, CI 95%: 77.6-80.2) and 78.9 cm (65.6-88.3, CI 95%: 77.8-80.5), respectively (P < .001). Mean 2D and 3D knee varus/valgus angles were -1.9° (-26.4 to 9.1, CI 95%: -3.5 to -0.7) and -0.9° (-19.2 to 11.8, CI 95%: -2.4 to 0.2), respectively (P = .004). Multiple regression analysis found that patients with >10° of flexum/recurvatum were 2.1× more likely to perceive unequal length (P < .1). Patients with irreducible varus/valgus knee deformity were 4× more likely to perceive unequal length (P < .04).
CONCLUSION: EOS imaging allows more accurate assessment of anatomical and functional lengths. Patients' perceptions of lower extremity length may correlate more closely with coronal and sagittal alignments of the knee than with femoral or tibial length. This study highlights the importance of physical examination of all the joints and 3D measurements in functional standing position.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; femur; knee alignments; leg length; three-dimensional radiography; tibia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235329     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Independent restoration of femoral and acetabular height reduces limb length discrepancy and improves reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Warnock; Janet Hill; Lee Humphreys; Nicola Gallagher; Richard Napier; David Beverland
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-28

2.  Reliability of an Integrated Ultrasound and Stereophotogrammetric System for Lower Limb Anatomical Characterisation.

Authors:  Frederick Greatrex; Erica Montefiori; Thomas Grupp; Josef Kozak; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.781

3.  Leg length discrepancy: A systematic review on the validity and reliability of clinical assessments and imaging diagnostics used in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin Alfuth; Patrick Fichter; Axel Knicker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors influencing inconsistent leg length discrepancy in dysplastic hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Genta Takemoto; Yusuke Osawa; Taisuke Seki; Yasuhiko Takegami; Satoshi Ochiai; Daisaku Kato; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.