Literature DB >> 28887022

Additive Influence of Hip Offset and Leg Length Reconstruction on Postoperative Improvement in Clinical Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Moritz M Innmann1, Michael W Maier1, Marcus R Streit1, George Grammatopoulos2, Thomas Bruckner3, Tobias Gotterbarm1, Christian Merle1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of prospective studies investigating the additive effect of both acetabular and femoral reconstruction parameters on the functional outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the combined influence of hip geometry reconstruction and component positioning on the clinical outcome following primary THA for unilateral osteoarthritis. We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and radiographic parameters for hip geometry reconstruction, component position, and orientation using validated measurements for the operated hip compared to the contralateral native hip in a consecutive series of 113 patients with primary unilateral cementless THA. The correlation of reconstruction parameters was investigated using a multivariate polynomial regression model for the dependent variable ΔHHS (difference between the Harris hip scores preoperatively and 2.0-4.8 years postoperatively). Target zones for hip reconstruction and component positioning were investigated for an association with superior clinical outcome.
RESULTS: The regression model demonstrated a significant correlation for the ΔHHS and both hip offset (HO) reconstruction and leg length difference. Patients with accurate to slightly increased HO reconstruction combined with balanced leg length demonstrated a significantly higher ΔHHS than patients outside this zone (HO: 5 ± 5 and LLD: 0 ±5 mm, P = .029). This finding could be confirmed for 2 enlarged zones (zone 1: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 2.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .028; zone 2: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 7.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .007).
CONCLUSION: HO and leg length reconstruction demonstrated an additive effect on clinical outcome and surgeons should aim for high accuracy in the reconstruction of both factors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic level III; anatomy; geometry; limb length; offset; reconstruction; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887022     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  More than a feeling?-Overruling the preoperatively templated offset option leads to a minor offset increase in short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Christian Stadler; Rainer Hochgatterer; Jakob Allerstorfer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Influence of implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis on the ipsilateral leg alignment: the effect of sex and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Stefan van Drongelen; Benjamin Fey; Felix Stief; Andrea Meurer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Supine versus lateral position for total hip replacement: accuracy of biomechanical reconstruction.

Authors:  Niall P McGoldrick; Stephanie Antoniades; Sherif El Meniawy; Cheryl Kreviazuk; Paul E Beaulé; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Independent restoration of femoral and acetabular height reduces limb length discrepancy and improves reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Warnock; Janet Hill; Lee Humphreys; Nicola Gallagher; Richard Napier; David Beverland
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-28

Review 5.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  A comparison of radiographic leg-length and offset discrepancies between 2 intraoperative measurement techniques in anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Brendan E Dempsey; Samuel T Kunkel; Michael T Torchia; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-10-22

7.  Total hip arthroplasty with modular stem for Crowe I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Kong; Yunming Sun; Minzhi Yang; Yonggang Zhou; Jiying Chen; Wei Chai; Yan Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mengxuan Yao; Yuchuan Wang; Congcong Wei; Yongtai Han; Huijie Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Restoration of Proximal Femoral Anatomy during Total Hip Arthroplasty for High Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: An Original Technique.

Authors:  Kerong Wu; Xianzuo Zhang; Min Chen; Xifu Shang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  A Workflow Change in Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Accuracy of Biomechanical Reconstruction Without Increased Risk of Complications.

Authors:  Stephanie V Kaszuba; Kyle M Behrens; Chad B Anderson; Alexander C Gordon
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.