Literature DB >> 31671982

Individual listener differences in azimuthal front-back reversals.

William A Yost1, M Torben Pastore1.   

Abstract

Thirty-two listeners participated in experiments involving five filtered noises when listeners kept their eyes open or closed, for stimuli of short or long duration, and for stimuli that were presented at random locations or in a largely rotational procession. Individual differences in the proportion of front-back reversals (FBRs) were measured. There were strong positive correlations between the proportion of FBRs for any one filtered noise, but not when FBRs were compared across different filtered-noise conditions. The results suggest that, for each individual listener, the rate of FBRs is stable for any one filtered noise, but not across filtered noises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31671982      PMCID: PMC6814437          DOI: 10.1121/1.5129555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in external-ear transfer functions reduced by scaling in frequency.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Localization of brief sounds: effects of level and background noise.

Authors:  E A Macpherson; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of duration and level on human sound localization.

Authors:  Joyce Vliegen; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The acoustical bright spot and mislocalization of tones by human listeners.

Authors:  Eric J Macaulay; William M Hartmann; Brad Rakerd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sound source localization of filtered noises by listeners with normal hearing: a statistical analysis.

Authors:  William A Yost; Louise Loiselle; Michael Dorman; Jason Burns; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. II. Pinna cues absent.

Authors:  S R Oldfield; S P Parker
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  The contribution of head motion cues to localization of low-pass noise.

Authors:  S Perrett; W Noble
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-10

10.  On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back.

Authors:  Peter Xinya Zhang; William M Hartmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 2.  Age and Auditory Spatial Perception in Humans: Review of Behavioral Findings and Suggestions for Future Research.

Authors:  Michael Keith Russell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.