Literature DB >> 6535984

Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. II. Pinna cues absent.

S R Oldfield, S P Parker.   

Abstract

The acuity of azimuth and elevation discrimination was measured under conditions in which the cues to localisation provided by the pinnae were removed. Four subjects localised a sound source (white noise through a speaker) which varied in position over a range of elevations (-40 degrees to +40 degrees) and azimuths (0 degree to 180 degrees), at 10 degrees intervals, on the left side of the head. Pinna cues were removed by the insertion of individually cast moulds in both pinnae. Each mould had an access hole to the auditory canal. The absolute and algebraic, azimuth and elevation errors were measured for all subjects at each position of the source. The variability of azimuth and elevation error was also computed. The performance of the subjects was compared to their performance under normal hearing conditions. Insertion of the pinnae moulds was found to increase substantially elevation error and the number of front/back reversals. The importance of the cues provided by the pinnae in these discriminations was thus confirmed. However, the increase in elevation error did not result in a corresponding increase in azimuth error. These findings provide support for the proposition that azimuth and elevation discrimination are coded independently.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6535984     DOI: 10.1068/p130601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  16 in total

1.  Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals.

Authors:  M-E Doucet; J-P Guillemot; M Lassonde; J-P Gagné; C Leclerc; F Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sound localisation during illusory self-rotation.

Authors:  Ken I McAnally; Russell L Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Relearning auditory spectral cues for locations inside and outside the visual field.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Toby Blackman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04

5.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Individual listener differences in azimuthal front-back reversals.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Adaptive reweighting of auditory localization cues in response to chronic unilateral earplugging in humans.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Oliver Kacelnik; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back.

Authors:  Peter Xinya Zhang; William M Hartmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Role of auditory cortex in sound localization in the midsagittal plane.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Carl H Parsons; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The effect of spatial-temporal audiovisual disparities on saccades in a complex scene.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; Andrew H Bell; Douglas P Munoz; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.