Literature DB >> 19900525

On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back.

Peter Xinya Zhang1, William M Hartmann.   

Abstract

In order to determine whether a sound source is in front or in back, listeners can use location-dependent spectral cues caused by diffraction from their anatomy. This capability was studied using a precise virtual reality technique (VRX) based on a transaural technology. Presented with a virtual baseline simulation accurate up to 16 kHz, listeners could not distinguish between the simulation and a real source. Experiments requiring listeners to discriminate between front and back locations were performed using controlled modifications of the baseline simulation to test hypotheses about the important spectral cues. The experiments concluded: (1) Front/back cues were not confined to any particular 1/3rd or 2/3rd octave frequency region. Often adequate cues were available in any of several disjoint frequency regions. (2) Spectral dips were more important than spectral peaks. (3) Neither monaural cues nor interaural spectral level difference cues were adequate. (4) Replacing baseline spectra by sharpened spectra had minimal effect on discrimination performance. (5) When presented with an interaural time difference less than 200 micros, which pulled the image to the side, listeners still successfully discriminated between front and back, suggesting that front/back discrimination is independent of azimuthal localization within certain limits. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900525      PMCID: PMC2814998          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  34 in total

1.  The contribution of two ears to the perception of vertical angle in sagittal planes.

Authors:  M Morimoto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Variability in the characterization of the headphone transfer-function.

Authors:  A Kulkarni; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Utility of monaural spectral cues is enhanced in the presence of cues to sound-source lateral angle.

Authors:  Russell L Martin; Miles Paterson; Ken I McAnally
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-12-18

4.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization.

Authors:  Erno H A Langendijk; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vertical-plane sound localization probed with ripple-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The influence of duration and level on human sound localization.

Authors:  Joyce Vliegen; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The contribution of the near and far ear toward localization of sound in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  R A Humanski; R A Butler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural weighting of pinna cues in human sound localization.

Authors:  M Hofman; J Van Opstal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Type III units in the gerbil dorsal cochlear nucleus may be spectral notch detectors.

Authors:  J E Parsons; E Lim; H F Voigt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  10 in total

1.  Phase effects on the perceived elevation of complex tones.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Virginia Best; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers.

Authors:  Alan W Boyd; William M Whitmer; John J Soraghan; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Transaural experiments and a revised duplex theory for the localization of low-frequency tones.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Brad Rakerd; Zane D Crawford; Peter Xinya Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Individual listener differences in azimuthal front-back reversals.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vertical-plane sound localization with distorted spectral cues.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; Andrew T Sabin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Acoustic and non-acoustic factors in modeling listener-specific performance of sagittal-plane sound localization.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Robert Baumgartner; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  Perceptual factors contribute more than acoustical factors to sound localization abilities with virtual sources.

Authors:  Guillaume Andéol; Sophie Savel; Anne Guillaume
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Binaural Modelling and Spatial Auditory Cue Analysis of 3D-Printed Ears.

Authors:  Te Meng Ting; Nur Syazreen Ahmad; Patrick Goh; Junita Mohamad-Saleh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Modeling sound-source localization in sagittal planes for human listeners.

Authors:  Robert Baumgartner; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.