| Literature DB >> 31667519 |
Yanislava Karusheva1,2, Theresa Koessler1,2,3, Klaus Strassburger2,4, Daniel Markgraf1,2, Lucia Mastrototaro1,2, Tomas Jelenik1,2, Marie-Christine Simon1,2, Dominik Pesta1,2, Oana-Patricia Zaharia1,2, Kálmán Bódis1,2,3, Felix Bärenz5, Dieter Schmoll5, Martin Wolkersdorfer6, Andrea Tura7, Giovanni Pacini7, Volker Burkart1,2, Karsten Müssig1,2,3, Julia Szendroedi1,2,3, Michael Roden1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown that increased circulating branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) are associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). This may result from altered energy metabolism or dietary habits.Entities:
Keywords: branched-chain amino acids; diet; gut microbiome; insulin secretion; insulin sensitivity; mitochondrial function; patients with type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31667519 PMCID: PMC6821637 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0002-9165 Impact factor: 7.045
Study participants’ anthropometric and metabolic characteristics[1]
| Variables | Values |
|---|---|
|
| 12 (8/4) |
| Age, y | 54 ± 4 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 30.8 ± 2.8 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 49 ± 10 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.6 ± 0.9 |
| Fasting blood glucose, mg/dL | 118 ± 8 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 273 ± 245 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 224 ± 135 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 145 ± 32 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 45 ± 11 |
| ALT, U/I | 38 ± 14 |
| AST, U/I | 28 ± 6 |
| GGT, U/I | 48 ± 8 |
| Total BCAAs, µmol/L | 531 ± 98 |
| Isoleucine, µmol/L | 87 ± 25 |
| Leucine, µmol/L | 159 ± 35 |
| Valine, µmol/L | 285 ± 41 |
Values are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
FIGURE 1Insulin secretion assessed by mixed meal tolerance test. (A) Concentrations of BCAAs, (B) iAUC for BCAAs, (C) blood glucose, (D) AUC for blood glucose, (E) insulin, (F) iAUC for insulin, (G) C-peptide, (H) iAUC for C-peptide, (I) FFAs, and (J) iAUC for FFAs at the end of each intervention week. Differences between treatment effects were tested using the classical crossover test, which compares the intraindividual period differences of the outcome between the sequence groups. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding BCAA− values, n = 12. BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; FFA, free fatty acid; iAUC, incremental AUC.
FIGURE 2OGIS (A) and PREDIM (B) at the end of both interventions. Differences between treatment effects were tested using the classical crossover test, which compares the intraindividual period differences of the outcome between the sequence groups. Values are mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, n = 12. BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; OGIS, oral glucose sensitivity index; PREDIM, PREDIcted M.
Results from whole-body insulin sensitivity testing by 2-step HEC test[1]
| Low clamp | High clamp | ∆L vs. ∆H[ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCAA+ | BCAA− |
| BCAA+ | BCAA− |
|
| |
| BCAAs, µmol/L | n.d. | n.d. |
| 346.6 ± 80.2 | 312.1 ± 67.3 | <0.001 | — |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 91.9 ± 2.2 | 91.6 ± 2.3 | 0.78 | 90.7 ± 1.8 | 91.4 ± 2.4 | 0.41 | 0.17 |
| Insulin, µU/mL | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 26.3 ± 7.0 | 0.43 | 54.2 ± 10.4* | 52.2 ± 11.4# | 0.46 | 0.31 |
| M/I | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.98 | 0.07 ± 0.04* | 0.06 ± 0.04# | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| EGP suppression, % | 29.2 ± 16.6 | 49.4 ± 10.6 | 0.97 | 83.1 ± 18.0* | 86.8 ± 11.4# | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| FFA suppression, % | 65.7 ± 19.5 | 64.6 ± 14.8 | 0.84 | 85.1 ± 11.0* | 86.6 ± 6.2# | 0.66 | 0.07 |
Values are mean ± SD, n = 12. All parameters were measured during the HEC steady state. *P < 0.05 between variables derived after BCAA+ intervention under low and high clamp conditions; #P < 0.05 between variables derived after BCAA− intervention under low and high clamp conditions. BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; EGP, endogenous glucose production; FFA, free fatty acid; HEC, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp; M/I, HEC-derived M value adjusted for prevalent insulin concentrations during steady state; n.d., not done; ∆H, changes of parameters during high clamp; ∆L, changes of parameters during low clamp.
P values of comparisons between ∆L and ∆H.
FIGURE 3Insulin signaling and mitochondrial oxidative efficiency/capacity in white adipose tissue biopsy samples. (A) Phosphorylation of protein kinase B (AKT) at serine 473, (B) phosphorylation of AKT at threonine 308, (C) pmTOR at serine 2481, (D) RCR (state 3:state 4o), and (E) β-oxidation–linked respiration in adipose tissue. Differences between treatment effects were tested using the classical crossover test, which compares the intraindividual period differences of the outcome between the sequence groups. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n = 12. BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; fccp, carbonyl cyanide p-[trifluoromethoxyl]-phenyl-hydrozone; pmTOR, phosphorylation of mechanistic target of rapamycin; RCR, respiratory control ratio.
FIGURE 4Alterations in microbiota: abundance of fecal Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Values are mean ± SEM. Differences between treatment effects were tested using the classical crossover test, which compares the intraindividual period differences of the outcome between the sequence groups. *P < 0.05, n = 10.