Literature DB >> 34027277

Branched-Chain Amino Acids Associate Negatively With Postprandial Insulin Secretion in Recent-Onset Diabetes.

Yanislava Karusheva1,2, Klaus Strassburger2,3, Daniel F Markgraf1,2, Oana-Patricia Zaharia1,2, Kálmán Bódis1,2,4, Theresa Kössler1,2,4, Andrea Tura5, Giovanni Pacini5, Volker Burkart1,2, Michael Roden1,2,4, Julia Szendroedi1,2,4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In addition to unfavorable effects on insulin sensitivity, elevated plasma branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) stimulate insulin secretion, which, over the long-term, could impair pancreatic β-cell function.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate cross-sectional and prospective associations between circulating BCAA and postprandial β-cell function in recently diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: The study included individuals with well-controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes (known diabetes duration <12 months) and glucose-tolerant participants (controls) of similar age, sex, and body mass index (n = 10/group) who underwent mixed meal tolerance tests. Plasma BCAA levels were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, postprandial β-cell function was assessed from serum C-peptide levels, and insulin sensitivity was determined from PREDIM index (PREDIcted M-value).
RESULTS: In type 1 diabetes, postprandial total BCAA, valine, and leucine levels were 25%, 18%, and 19% higher vs control, and total as well as individual postprandial BCAA were related inversely to C-peptide levels. In type 2 diabetes, postprandial isoleucine was 16% higher vs the respective controls, while neither total nor individual BCAA correlated with C-peptide levels. Whole-body insulin sensitivity was lower in both diabetes groups than in corresponding controls.
CONCLUSION: Insulin deficiency associates with sustained high BCAA concentrations, which could contribute to exhausting the insulin secretory reserve in early type 1 diabetes.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCAA; postprandial insulin secretion; recent-onset diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 34027277      PMCID: PMC8130764          DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Maintaining residual β-cell function is a key target of treating diabetes mellitus, in order to prevent hyperglycemia and delay diabetes-related complications [1]. In type 1 diabetes, dietary habits play a substantial role in preserving the residual β-cell function in the early course of the disease [2]. In type 2 diabetes, the β-cell plasticity determines the responsiveness to lifestyle modifications aiming at the prevention of further β-cell loss [3]. Amino acids (AA) enhance β-cell function via higher insulin biosynthesis and insulin secretion [4]. These short-term effects are predominantly due to branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) (leucine [LEU], isoleucine [ILE] and valine [VAL]), accounting for approximately 20% of dietary protein intake, which also relate to metabolic diseases [5]. Increased AA levels associate with insulin resistance [6], and particularly, BCAA may impair insulin signaling through the persistent activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) [7], or through alterations of gut microbiota and affecting nutrient absorption [8]. In this context, a short-term dietary reduction of BCAA resulted in lower postprandial insulin secretion and improved postprandial insulin sensitivity in volunteers with type 2 diabetes [9]. However, elevated BCAA, and especially LEU, not only stimulate insulin release [10] but also jeopardize β-cell integrity and may promote its intrinsic dysfunction [11]. BCAA are responsible for activation of several key enzymes and upregulation of genes [12] that coordinate the β-cell adaptation to dysglycemia, thereby exerting both stimulatory and inhibitory input to rise an adequate secretory response [13]. Nevertheless, the relationship of circulating BCAA with β-cell function is still controversial, which at least partly results from the use of different tests in humans. Here, we employed the mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), which is a highly reproducible method, has excellent tolerability, and is a reliable tool for the assessment of residual β-cell function [14]. Moreover, the intake of a standardized liquid meal induces a strong β-cell response independent of individual chewing and digestive efficiency and enables tracking of the physiological responses after a load of mixed nutrients [14] and in addition allowed tracking of acute BCAA load. We tested the hypothesis that circulating BCAA associate negatively with β-cell function from C-peptide in people with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes, who demonstrated at least 20% rise in C-peptide in glucagon stimulation test, or with type 2 diabetes, who demonstrated at least 40% rise in C-peptide.

Research Design and Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D group) or type 2 diabetes (T2D group) with known diabetes duration of less than 1 year and glucose-tolerant control persons of similar age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) (CON-T1D and CON-T2D) recruited from the German Diabetes Study (GDS) [15]. Participants with type 1 diabetes (n = 10) were treated with combination of different types of insulin (long-acting insulin detemir, n = 5 or glargine, n = 3, short-acting human insulin, n = 2 and rapid-acting insulin aspart, n = 6 or insulin lispro, n = 3, insulin glulisine, n = 1), participants with type 2 diabetes (n = 10) were treated with lifestyle modification and/or metformin but no other glucose-lowering drugs. Volunteers withdrew insulin (10 hours) and metformin (3 days) prior to examination. All participants gave their informed consent to the study protocol, which was approved by the Ethics Board of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01055093) and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki [15]. The MMTT was performed after a 10-hour overnight fast. The study participants were given 378 g of the standardized commercial liquid meal Boost High Protein 15 g protein (Nestlé S.A., Vevey, Switzerland), (365.8 kcal; 9.1 g fat, 50.1 g carbohydrates, and 22.8 g protein). Blood samples were taken at −10, −1, +10, +20, +30, +60, +90, +120, and +180 minutes for measurements of concentrations of blood glucose, serum insulin, serum C-peptide, free fatty acids (FFA), and triglycerides (TG) as previously described [15]. The glucagon stimulation test was performed as reported [15]. Mathematical modeling allows analysis of biphasic insulin secretion with data computed separately for the first (0-60 minutes) and second phase (61-180 minutes) of insulin secretion after meal administration [16]. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the PREDIM index (PREDIcted M-value index) [17]. Adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR) was calculated as the product of fasting or postprandial (180 min) plasma FFA (mmol*l-1) and insulin (pmol*l-1) [18]. Measurements of AA levels were performed as previously described [19]. Total LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, TG, and FFA as well as transaminases were measured on a Cobas c311 analyzer (Roche, Diagnostics, Darmstadt, Germany) [15]. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (first and third quartile) for continuous and percentages for categorical variables. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. Skewed data were log-transformed before analyses to approximate normal distribution. Differences between insulin secretion parameters and AA levels were assessed by ANOVA-like regression models, where residual variances were allowed to be different between groups. The area under the curve (AUC) and the incremental area under the concentration time curve (iAUC) were calculated using the trapezoidal method. Correlations between insulin secretion parameters and BCAA levels (iAUC of individual and total) were assessed in each group using Spearman correlation coefficients r and corresponding P values. To control for age, sex, and BMI as potential confounders the compared groups were matched for these factors. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows anthropometric parameters of the participants and their metabolic characteristics, indicating no clinically relevant impairment of liver or kidney function, excellent blood glucose control, and residual C-peptide secretion in participants with type 1 diabetes. Levels of BCAA and VAL were 16% and 15% higher during the last 2 hours of MMTT in type 1 diabetes vs CON-T1D, respectively (all P < 0.05, Figure 1A and 1G), whereas LEU and ILE were not different (Figure 1C and 1E). In participants with type 1 diabetes, the AUC of BCAA, LEU, and VAL were higher vs CON-T1D by 25%, 19%, and 18% (all P < 0.05), respectively (Table 2). In participants with type 2 diabetes, serum levels of BCAA, LEU, and ILE in the last 2 hours of MMTT were 16% (P < 0.05), 15% (P < 0.05), and 9% (P < 0.01) (Figure 1B, 1D, and 1F) higher vs CON-T2D. In participants with type 2 diabetes, there were no differences in AUC of total and individual BCAA vs CON-T2D except for ILE, which was 12% higher in participants with type 2 diabetes (P < 0.05) (Table 2). Participants with type 1 diabetes had higher blood glucose, but lower insulin and C-peptide levels than the corresponding controls. Participants with type 2 diabetes also had higher blood glucose levels, but delayed peaks of insulin and C-peptide levels compared to the corresponding control group (Figure 2). Accordingly, in participants with type 1 diabetes, postprandial serum insulin and serum C-peptide levels were lower vs CON-T1D (P < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 1.

Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of study participants

T1DCON-T1DT2DCON-T2D
Sex, n (male/female)(5/5)(5/5)(5/5)(5/5)
Age [years]36.6 ± 3.335.0 ± 1.857.4 ± 1.155.5 ± 1.9
BMI [kg/m2]26.2 ± 1.225.4 ± 0.731.6 ± 0.630.6 ± 0.4
HbA1c [mmol/mol]48 ± 932 ± 352 ± 935 ± 3
HbA1c [%]6.6 ± 0.95.1 ± 0.36.9 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 0.3
Fasting blood glucose [mg/dL]120.3 ± 37.887.9 ± 11.3138.8 ± 21.492.3 ± 6.4
Fasting C-peptide [ng/mL]0.7 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.92.6 ± 1.1
Triglycerides [mg/dL]70 [54; 100]117 [60; 146]172 [143; 225] 93 [85; 148]
LDL-cholesterol [mg/dL]127.4 ± 28.1103 ± 28.4121.5 ± 38.7151.3 ± 43.5
HDL-cholesterol [mg/dL]71.5 ± 15.967.3 ± 21.944.5 ± 16.962.2 ± 14.9
ALT [U/I]18 [15; 28]17 [16; 27]36 [21; 50]22 [18; 30]
AST [U/I]23 [17; 36]23 [18; 24]21 [19; 30]21 [18; 24]
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2107 [95; 117]105 [92; 110]77 [69; 86]83 [80; 96]
GGT [U/I]22 [13; 28]14 [10; 18]44 [27; 59]35 [20; 54]
Fasting BCAA [µmol/L]170.4 ± 46.1152.4 ± 30.5171.6 ± 26.2146.4 ± 29.0

Data are shown as mean ± SD or median (first and third quartile).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; BMI, body mass index; CON-T1D, control group for T1D group; CON-T2D, control group for T2D group; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes.

Figure 1.

Postprandial BCAA concentrations assessed during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and matched metabolically healthy participants (T1D-CON), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and matched metabolically healthy participants (T2D-CON). Postprandial levels of BCAA (A, B), leucine (C, D), isoleucine (E, F) and valine (G, H) during MMTT. Data were compared by unpaired t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Symbols above data points indicate significance compared to the corresponding data points of the control group. Symbols above lines indicate significance during last 2 hours of MMTT.

Table 2.

Insulin secretion and postprandial BCAA levels assessed during MMTT

T1DCON-T1D P T2DCON-T2D P
AUC blood glucose [mg*dL-1*3h-1]1797 ± 438815 ± 71 <0.01 1598 ± 424870 ± 42 <0.01
iAUC insulin [pmol*L-1*3h-1]8362 ± 424028 959 ± 10 034 <0.05 49 436 ± 23 01238 372 ± 20 221>0.05
iAUC C-peptide [µg*mL-1*3h-1]58 999 ± 31 776 186 259 ± 58 981 <0.05 243 260 ± 89 452 245 852 ± 89 452 >0.05
AUC BCAA [µmol*L-1*3h-1]11 167 ± 5136 8410 ± 3298 <0.05 10 616 ± 490310 315 ± 3796 >0.05
AUC LEU [µmol*L-1*3h-1]11 980 ± 43178476 ± 4257 <0.05 11 642 ± 536310 475 ± 4289>0.05
AUC ILE [µmol*L-1*3h-1]7159 ± 30255002 ± 2202 >0.057417 ± 33376543 ± 2762 <0.05
AUC VAL [µmol*L-1,*3h-1]14 363 ± 95911 754 ± 3890 <0.05 12 791 ± 611513 928 ± 4778>0.05

Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 10/group; P of comparisons between changes of blood glucose, serum insulin, serum C-peptide, and BCAA levels during MMTT.

AUC, area under the curve; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; BMI, body mass index; CON-T1D, control group for T1D group; CON-T2D, control group for T2D group; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; ILE, isoleucine; LEU, leucine; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes; VAL, valine.

Figure 2.

Postprandial concentrations of blood glucose, serum insulin, and C-peptide assessed during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and matched metabolically healthy control participants (T1D-CON), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and matched metabolically healthy control participants (T2D-CON). Postprandial levels of blood glucose (A, B), serum insulin (C, D) and serum C-peptide (E, F) during MMTT. Data were compared by unpaired t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001. Symbols above data points indicate significance compared to the corresponding data points of the control group. Symbols above lines indicate significance during last 2 hours of MMTT.

Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of study participants Data are shown as mean ± SD or median (first and third quartile). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; BMI, body mass index; CON-T1D, control group for T1D group; CON-T2D, control group for T2D group; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes. Insulin secretion and postprandial BCAA levels assessed during MMTT Data are shown as mean ± SD, n = 10/group; P of comparisons between changes of blood glucose, serum insulin, serum C-peptide, and BCAA levels during MMTT. AUC, area under the curve; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; BMI, body mass index; CON-T1D, control group for T1D group; CON-T2D, control group for T2D group; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; ILE, isoleucine; LEU, leucine; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes; VAL, valine. Postprandial BCAA concentrations assessed during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and matched metabolically healthy participants (T1D-CON), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and matched metabolically healthy participants (T2D-CON). Postprandial levels of BCAA (A, B), leucine (C, D), isoleucine (E, F) and valine (G, H) during MMTT. Data were compared by unpaired t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Symbols above data points indicate significance compared to the corresponding data points of the control group. Symbols above lines indicate significance during last 2 hours of MMTT. Postprandial concentrations of blood glucose, serum insulin, and C-peptide assessed during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and matched metabolically healthy control participants (T1D-CON), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and matched metabolically healthy control participants (T2D-CON). Postprandial levels of blood glucose (A, B), serum insulin (C, D) and serum C-peptide (E, F) during MMTT. Data were compared by unpaired t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001. Symbols above data points indicate significance compared to the corresponding data points of the control group. Symbols above lines indicate significance during last 2 hours of MMTT. PREDIM was lower in type 1 diabetes 3.3 ± 1.1 vs CON-T1D 7.0 ± 1.4 mg*kg-1*min-1, P < 0.01 and in type 2 diabetes 2.3 ± 0.5 vs CON-T2D 5.0 ± 0.7 mg*kg-1*min-1, P < 0.01. Fasting and postprandial Adipo-IR were not different in type 1 diabetes vs CON-T1D, while both were higher in type 2 diabetes vs CON-T2D (both P < 0.001, data not shown). To test for associations between BCAA and insulin sensitivity, we analyzed in detail the correlations between total and individual BCAA with PREDIM and Adipo-IR at fasting and in the postprandial state. Neither PREDIM nor Adipo-IR related to total or individual BCAA levels (Table 3).
Table 3.

Correlations of PREDIM index and Adipo-IR with BCAA levels

T1DT2D
PREDIMAdipo-IR fastedAdipo-IR postpPREDIMAdipo-IR fastedAdipo-IR postp
Total BCAA-0.140.310.05-0.050.15-0.20
0.700.380.880.880.680.61
0.620.370.500.480.110.49
LEU-0.470.280.05-0.080.12-0.18
0.170.430.880.830.750.64
0.580.370.410.460.060.35
ILE-0.270.250.04-0.130.25-0.12
0.450.490.910.730.490.77
0.640.780.800.380.030.21
VAL-0.160.270.010.030.05-0.32
0.650.450.990.930.880.41
0.680.350.520.570.310.92

N = 10/group; P of comparisons between individual and total BCAA and PREDIM index, fasted and postprandial Adipo-IR. Correlations are assessed in every group using Spearman correlation coefficients r and corresponding P. P of comparisons between the differences of the corresponding regression slopes of the 2 diabetes groups and their controls analyzed by a general linear mixed model approach, where the residual variances were allowed to be different between the groups.

Abbreviations: BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; VAL, valine; LEU, leucine; ILE, isoleucine.

Correlations of PREDIM index and Adipo-IR with BCAA levels N = 10/group; P of comparisons between individual and total BCAA and PREDIM index, fasted and postprandial Adipo-IR. Correlations are assessed in every group using Spearman correlation coefficients r and corresponding P. P of comparisons between the differences of the corresponding regression slopes of the 2 diabetes groups and their controls analyzed by a general linear mixed model approach, where the residual variances were allowed to be different between the groups. Abbreviations: BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; VAL, valine; LEU, leucine; ILE, isoleucine. Participants with type 1 diabetes showed an inverse association between AUC C-peptide and iAUC of total BCAA as well as iAUC of individual BCAA (Table 4). Furthermore, total insulin secretion associated negatively with the total and individual BCAA. In the corresponding matched CON-T1D, no associations were detected. In participants with type 2 diabetes and in CON-T2D, there were no associations of BCAA levels and parameters of insulin secretion (data not shown). Comparison of the time courses of BCAA (Figure 1) with glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations (Figure 2) revealed that their peaks occurred later than those of BCAA in both groups of participants with diabetes (all P < 0.01). On the other hand, in the respective control groups, BCAA peaks coincided with those of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations (all P > 0.05).
Table 4.

Associations of insulin secretion parameters and BCAA during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes and CON-T1D

iAUC BCAAiAUC LEUiAUC ILEiAUC VAL
T1DCON-T1DT1DCON-T1DT1DCON-T1DT1DCON-T1D
r P r P P a r P r P P a r P r P P a r P r P P a
iAUC insulin-0.650.080.050.640.07-0.370.280.090.580.22-0.290.220.020.840.22-1.290.040.060.670.04
iAUC C-peptide-0.090.04-0.010.390.12-0.070.12-0.020.380.38-0.040.10-0.010.220.28-0.170.04-0.010.600.06
AUC C-peptide-0.07 0.01 -0.010.48 0.03 -0.05 0.04 -0.020.340.39-0.04 0.02 -0.010.320.12-0.14 0.01 -0.010.50 0.01
iAUC glucose10.830.09-23.230.640.496.470.27-20.770.750.674.760.24-19.970.590.5121.270.05-28.980.560.33
Blood glucose basal2507.240.01-3987.030.130.022309.10.01-3506.950.340.121500.39 0.01 -2372.680.19 0.04 3712.24 0.04 -6081.47 0.03 0.01
Total insulin secretion-499.14 0.01 -11.330.91 0.02 -372.87 0.03 3.690.980.08-274.84 0.02 -33.420.630.07-849.71 0.01 -4.260.97 0.02

N = 10/group; P of comparisons between changes of blood glucose, serum insulin, serum C-peptide, and BCAA levels during MMTT. Correlations are assessed in every group using Spearman correlation coefficients r and corresponding P. P of comparisons between the differences of the corresponding regression slopes of the 2 diabetes groups and their controls analyzed by a general linear mixed model approach, where the residual variances were allowed to be different between the groups.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; ILE, isoleucine; LEU, leucine; VAL, valine.

Associations of insulin secretion parameters and BCAA during MMTT in participants with type 1 diabetes and CON-T1D N = 10/group; P of comparisons between changes of blood glucose, serum insulin, serum C-peptide, and BCAA levels during MMTT. Correlations are assessed in every group using Spearman correlation coefficients r and corresponding P. P of comparisons between the differences of the corresponding regression slopes of the 2 diabetes groups and their controls analyzed by a general linear mixed model approach, where the residual variances were allowed to be different between the groups. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; ILE, isoleucine; LEU, leucine; VAL, valine.

Discussion

In persons with well-controlled recent-onset type 1 diabetes, impaired insulin secretion relates to elevated postprandial BCAA levels. Insulin deficiency could foster higher appearance of BCAA; in turn, sustained circulating BCAA might promote β-cell dysfunction in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. In previous studies in persons with type 1 diabetes, the association between BCAA levels and β-cell function was assessed from oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and related to fasting but not to postprandial BCAA [20]. In our study, β-cell function and BCAA levels were assessed from MMTT, which reflects the physiological postprandial interdependence of circulating AA and insulin secretion. We further expand on previous observations regarding the relationship of BCAA and β-cell function in the fasting state, by exploring their dynamics in the postprandial state in humans with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The design of the current study allows an accurate assessment of pancreatic secretory capacity, as β-cell sensitivity is higher during the meal [21]. Compared with the glucagon stimulation test, the MMTT induces a stronger postprandial C-peptide release and therefore represents the most suitable method to estimate residual β-cell function. In the present study, all tested persons with diabetes duration of < 1 year had measurable C-peptide values and excellent blood glucose control. This is in agreement with a study describing detectable C-peptide values and fasting blood glucose levels between 70 and 200 mg/dL in more than 85% of individuals with type 1 diabetes over up to 4 years after diagnosis [14]. The meal-induced insulin response is typically biphasic, with the amount of insulin released also depending on factors other than β-cell function, such as the meal size and composition, prevailing glycemia, and insulin sensitivity [2]. Interestingly, in participants with type 1 diabetes, BCAA and VAL concentrations remained higher in the second phase of the MMTT compared with the matched control group. This was likely the result of limited secretory capacity of the β-cell in type 1 diabetes leading to less persistent uptake of BCAA, which is in line with previously shown data in humans with type 1 diabetes [22]. Of note, in our study population, total BCAA, but also all individual BCAA, LEU, ILE, and VAL, were each negatively associated with in vivo β-cell function as assessed by C-peptide levels. In addition to β-cell function, we assessed insulin sensitivity from MMTT. Insulin sensitivity was lower in the participants with type 1 diabetes compared with glucose-tolerant participants of similar weight. The study participants with type 1 diabetes were metabolically well-controlled according to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and TG levels, but they proved to be insulin-resistant shortly after diagnosis. While fasting BCAA levels were comparable to CON-T1D, postprandial levels of total BCAA, as well as VAL and LEU, were increased, likely contributing to the development of insulin resistance in early type 1 diabetes. Elevated circulating LEU and ILE levels result in increased β-oxidation and acetyl CoA formation, while inhibiting lipid-derived acetyl CoA entry in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, thus contributing to impaired glycolysis and glucose uptake in skeletal muscle [23]. Furthermore, increased BCAA levels led to mTOR activation and disturbed insulin signaling through inhibitory phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 [24]. Moreover, BCAA elevation may jeopardize β-cell survival possibly due to chronic mTOR activation with enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress [25, 26] ultimately favoring β-cell apoptosis [27] and altered mitochondrial function [24]. Furthermore, it might be speculated that long-term exposure to sustained circulating BCAA could promote β-cell dysfunction. However, deteriorating effects of BCAA on β-cells may require further elucidation, as recent evidence implies lack of association between BCAA levels, risk of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction in clinical [28] and experimental settings [29]. Interestingly, we found no association between BCAA levels and insulin sensitivity, as assessed from PREDIM or Adipo-IR. These findings suggest that in type 1 diabetes lower insulin levels and in type 2 diabetes impaired insulin sensitivity might promote lower postprandial BCAA uptake and protein synthesis. However, as BCAA levels and insulin sensitivity did not correlate, our current data do not allow us to draw any conclusion regarding a causal relationship. In the postabsorptive state of participants with type 2 diabetes, only ILE remained elevated throughout the MMTT compared with CON-T2D. Increased levels of total or individual BCAA associate with obesity observed in participants with type 2 diabetes and CON-T2D as proven in previous works [24]. This finding might result from the accumulation of incompletely oxidized intermediates of fatty acids and BCAA oxidation [23]. In type 2 diabetes, no correlations between circulating BCAA and insulin secretion were observed. In these participants, glucose-lowering medication could contribute to β-cell preservation and thereby conceal the relation between BCAA and insulin secretion. As expected, insulin sensitivity was lower and insulin secretion was higher in type 2 diabetes compared to CON-T2D. Moreover, Adipo-IR was higher in type 2 diabetes compared with the control group, a possible indication of beginning impairment of adipose tissue energy metabolism [18]. In the present study, participants with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes had partially preserved insulin secretory capacity. Detectable residual β-cell function in the early course of the disease has strong long-term beneficial effects [30]. However, residual effects of exogenous insulin in participants with type 1 diabetes may still represent a limitation of the study, as they may affect fasting plasma insulin levels. Residual effects of metformin therapy in participants with type 2 diabetes may affect the findings. However, discontinuation of treatment for 3 days prior to the study in these volunteers with largely preserved kidney function renders this interference with the results unlikely. Further limitations are the relatively small study population and interindividual differences of premenopausal females. However, the study was designed as a proof-of-concept pilot study with unknown effect size of BCAA on β-cell function prior to initiation. The major strengths of this analysis are the precisely age-, sex-, and BMI-matched groups of comprehensively phenotyped participants. Taken together, the findings from present study illustrate a lack of associations between BCAA levels and parameters of insulin secretion and sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. On the other hand, our data reveals a negative relationship between BCAA concentrations and β-cell function in type 1 diabetes, reflective of an increased insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes even shortly after diagnosis. We conclude that—while insulin deficiency could decrease cellular AA uptake—sustained circulating BCAA associate with decreased postprandial insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes.
  29 in total

1.  The stunned beta cell: a brief history.

Authors:  Ele Ferrannini
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 27.287

2.  Nutrient-Induced Metabolic Stress, Adaptation, Detoxification, and Toxicity in the Pancreatic β-Cell.

Authors:  Marc Prentki; Marie-Line Peyot; Pellegrino Masiello; S R Murthy Madiraju
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 9.461

3.  Prediction of clamp-derived insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose insulin sensitivity index.

Authors:  Andrea Tura; Gaetano Chemello; Julia Szendroedi; Christian Göbl; Kristine Færch; Jana Vrbíková; Giovanni Pacini; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Roden
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Risk of diabetes-associated diseases in subgroups of patients with recent-onset diabetes: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Oana P Zaharia; Klaus Strassburger; Alexander Strom; Gidon J Bönhof; Yanislava Karusheva; Sofia Antoniou; Kálmán Bódis; Daniel F Markgraf; Volker Burkart; Karsten Müssig; Jong-Hee Hwang; Olof Asplund; Leif Groop; Emma Ahlqvist; Jochen Seissler; Peter Nawroth; Stefan Kopf; Sebastian M Schmid; Michael Stumvoll; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Stefan Kabisch; Sergey Tselmin; Hans U Häring; Dan Ziegler; Oliver Kuss; Julia Szendroedi; Michael Roden
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  The Impact of Dietary Factors on Glycemic Control, Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion in the First Years after Diagnosis of Diabetes.

Authors:  K S Weber; A E Buyken; B Nowotny; K Strassburger; M-C Simon; G Pacini; J Szendroedi; K Müssig; M Roden
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.949

6.  Direct and indirect effects of amino acids on hepatic glucose metabolism in humans.

Authors:  M Krebs; A Brehm; M Krssak; C Anderwald; E Bernroider; P Nowotny; E Roth; V Chandramouli; B R Landau; W Waldhäusl; M Roden
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21-22 October 2001.

Authors:  Jerry P Palmer; G Alexander Fleming; Carla J Greenbaum; Kevan C Herold; Lisa D Jansa; Hubert Kolb; John M Lachin; Kenneth S Polonsky; Paolo Pozzilli; Jay S Skyler; Michael W Steffes
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Cohort profile: the German Diabetes Study (GDS).

Authors:  Julia Szendroedi; Aaruni Saxena; Katharina S Weber; Klaus Strassburger; Christian Herder; Volker Burkart; Bettina Nowotny; Andrea Icks; Oliver Kuss; Dan Ziegler; Hadi Al-Hasani; Karsten Müssig; Michael Roden
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  Short-term dietary reduction of branched-chain amino acids reduces meal-induced insulin secretion and modifies microbiome composition in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Yanislava Karusheva; Theresa Koessler; Klaus Strassburger; Daniel Markgraf; Lucia Mastrototaro; Tomas Jelenik; Marie-Christine Simon; Dominik Pesta; Oana-Patricia Zaharia; Kálmán Bódis; Felix Bärenz; Dieter Schmoll; Martin Wolkersdorfer; Andrea Tura; Giovanni Pacini; Volker Burkart; Karsten Müssig; Julia Szendroedi; Michael Roden
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Expansion and Impaired Mitochondrial Efficiency of Deep Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Recent-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Kálmán Bódis; Tomas Jelenik; Jesper Lundbom; Daniel F Markgraf; Alexander Strom; Oana-Patricia Zaharia; Yanislava Karusheva; Volker Burkart; Karsten Müssig; Yuliya Kupriyanova; Meriem Ouni; Martin Wolkersdorfer; Jong-Hee Hwang; Dan Ziegler; Annette Schürmann; Michael Roden; Julia Szendroedi
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Critical Role of the Branched Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs) Catabolism-Regulating Enzymes, Branched-Chain Aminotransferase (BCAT) and Branched-Chain α-Keto Acid Dehydrogenase (BCKD), in Human Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Aikaterini Dimou; Vasilis Tsimihodimos; Eleni Bairaktari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Mathematical model of insulin kinetics accounting for the amino acids effect during a mixed meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Micaela Morettini; Maria Concetta Palumbo; Christian Göbl; Laura Burattini; Yanislava Karusheva; Michael Roden; Giovanni Pacini; Andrea Tura
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.055

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.