Literature DB >> 31665712

Electrochemical characteristics of ultramicro-dimensioned SIROF electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

A Ghazavi1, J Maeng, M Black, S Salvi, S F Cogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With ever increasing applications of neural recording and stimulation, the necessity for developing neural interfaces with higher selectivity and lower invasiveness is inevitable. Reducing the electrode size is one approach to achieving such goals. In this study, we investigated the effect of electrode geometric surface area (GSA), from 20 μm2 to 1960 μm2, on the electrochemical impedance and charge-injection properties of sputtered iridium oxide (SIROF) coated electrodes in response to current-pulsing typical of neural stimulation. These data were used to assess the electrochemical properties of ultra-small SIROF electrodes (GSA  <  200 μm2) for stimulation and recording applications. APPROACH: SIROF charge storage capacities (CSC), impedance, and charge-injection characteristics during current-pulsing of planar, circular electrodes were evaluated in an inorganic model of interstitial fluid (model-ISF). MAIN
RESULTS: SIROF electrodes as small as 20 μm2 could provide 1.3 nC/phase (200 μs pulse width, 0.6 V versus Ag|AgCl interpulse bias) of charge during current pulsing. The 1 kHz impedance of all electrodes used in this study were below 1 MΩ, which is suitable for neural recording. SIGNIFICANCE: Ultra-small SIROF electrodes are capable of charge injection in buffered saline at levels above some reported thresholds for neural stimulation with microelectrodes.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31665712      PMCID: PMC7376958          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab52ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  40 in total

1.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina.

Authors:  A Stett; W Barth; S Weiss; H Haemmerle; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS.

Authors:  John P Seymour; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  A Butterwick; A Vankov; P Huie; Y Freyvert; D Palanker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Tracking tonic dopamine levels in vivo using multiple cyclic square wave voltammetry.

Authors:  Yoonbae Oh; Michael L Heien; Cheonho Park; Yu Min Kang; Jaekyung Kim; Suelen Lucio Boschen; Hojin Shin; Hyun U Cho; Charles D Blaha; Kevin E Bennet; Han Kyu Lee; Sung Jun Jung; In Young Kim; Kendall H Lee; Dong Pyo Jang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  John L Skousen; Sr Mary Elizabeth Merriam; Onnap Srivannavit; Gaytri Perlin; Kensall D Wise; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  In vivo and in vitro comparison of the charge injection capacity of platinum macroelectrodes.

Authors:  Ronald T Leung; Mohit N Shivdasani; David A X Nayagam; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses.

Authors:  D B McCreery
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  In vitro comparison of the selectivity of electrodes for in vivo electrochemistry.

Authors:  P M Kovach; A G Ewing; R L Wilson; R M Wightman
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Sputtered iridium oxide films for neural stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Julia Ehrlich; Timothy D Plante; Anton Smirnov; Douglas B Shire; Marcus Gingerich; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.

Authors:  Eve McGlynn; Vahid Nabaei; Elisa Ren; Gabriel Galeote-Checa; Rupam Das; Giulia Curia; Hadi Heidari
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 2.  Electrode Materials for Chronic Electrical Microstimulation.

Authors:  Xin Sally Zheng; Chao Tan; Elisa Castagnola; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 3.  A Review: Electrode and Packaging Materials for Neurophysiology Recording Implants.

Authors:  Weiyang Yang; Yan Gong; Wen Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-14

4.  Parylene C as an Insulating Polymer for Implantable Neural Interfaces: Acute Electrochemical Impedance Behaviors in Saline and Pig Brain In Vitro.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Jing Zhang; Song Le; Lan Niu; Jin Tao; Jingqiu Liang; Lihua Zhang; Xiaoyang Kang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Soft Devices for High-Resolution Neuro-Stimulation: The Interplay Between Low-Rigidity and Resolution.

Authors:  Ieva Vėbraitė; Yael Hanein
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-06-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.