Literature DB >> 21867802

Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays.

John L Skousen1, Sr Mary Elizabeth Merriam, Onnap Srivannavit, Gaytri Perlin, Kensall D Wise, Patrick A Tresco.   

Abstract

A consistent feature of the foreign body response (FBR), irrespective of the type of implant, is persistent inflammation at the biotic-abiotic interface signaled by biomarkers of macrophage/microglial activation. Since macrophage-secreted factors shape the foreign body reaction, implant designs that reduce macrophage activation should improve biocompatibility and, with regard to recording devices, should improve reliability and longevity. At present, it is unclear whether the goal of seamless integration is possible or whether electrode developers can modulate specific aspects of the FBR by intentionally manipulating the constitutive properties of the implant. To explore this area, we studied the chronic brain FBR to planar solid silicon microelectrode arrays and planar lattice arrays with identical penetrating profiles but with reduced surface area in rats after an 8-week indwelling period. Using quantitative immunohistochemistry, we found that presenting less surface area after equivalent iatrogenic injury is accompanied by significantly less persistent macrophage activation, decreased blood brain barrier leakiness, and reduced neuronal cell loss. Our findings show that it is possible for implant developers to modulate specific aspects of the FBR by intentionally manipulating the constitutive properties of the implant. Our results also support the theory that the FBR to implanted electrode arrays, and likely other implants, can be explained by the presence of macrophages at the biotic-abiotic interface, which act as a sustained delivery source of bioactive agents that diffuse into the adjacent tissue and shape various features of the brain FBR. Further, our findings suggest that one method to improve the recording consistency and lifetime of implanted microelectrode arrays is to design implants that reduce the amount of macrophage activation at the biotic-abiotic interface and/or enhance the clearance or impact of their released factors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21867802     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  40 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Understanding the Role of Innate Immunity in the Response to Intracortical Microelectrodes.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018

4.  Quantitative simulation of extracellular single unit recording from the surface of cortex.

Authors:  Mackenna Hill; Estefania Rios; Shyam Kumar Sudhakar; Douglas H Roossien; Ciara Caldwell; Dawen Cai; Omar J Ahmed; Scott F Lempka; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Insertion of linear 8.4 μm diameter 16 channel carbon fiber electrode arrays for single unit recordings.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Kyounghwan Na; Huanan Zhang; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Euisik Yoon; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Chunxiu Yu; Jaydeep Sambangi; Curtis D Lee; John J Whalen; Artin Petrossians; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response.

Authors:  Jessica K Nguyen; Daniel J Park; John L Skousen; Allison E Hess-Dunning; Dustin J Tyler; Stuart J Rowan; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Recent Advances in Neural Electrode-Tissue Interfaces.

Authors:  Kevin Woeppel; Qianru Yang; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-23

9.  The Effect of Residual Endotoxin Contamination on the Neuroinflammatory Response to Sterilized Intracortical Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Madhumitha Ravikumar; Daniel J Hageman; William H Tomaszewski; Gabriella M Chandra; John L Skousen; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.331

10.  Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-ionic liquid coating improves neural recording and stimulation functionality of MEAs.

Authors:  Zhanhong Jeff Du; Xiliang Luo; Cassandra Weaver; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Mater Chem C Mater       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.