Literature DB >> 12902426

Performance of a brain PET camera based on anger-logic gadolinium oxyorthosilicate detectors.

Joel S Karp1, Suleman Surti, Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon, Richard Freifelder, Christopher A Cardi, Lars-Eric Adam, Kilian Bilger, Gerd Muehllehner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A high-sensitivity, high-resolution brain PET scanner ("G-PET") has been developed. This scanner is similar in geometry to a previous brain scanner developed at the University of Pennsylvania, the HEAD Penn-PET, but the detector technology and electronics have been improved to achieve enhanced performance.
METHODS: This scanner has a detector ring diameter of 42.0 cm with a patient aperture of 30.0 cm and an axial field of view of 25.6 cm. It comprises a continuous light-guide that couples 18,560 (320 x 58 array) 4 x 4 x 10 mm(3) gadolinium oxyorthosilicate (GSO) crystals to 288 (36 x 8 array) 39-mm photomultiplier tubes in a hexagonal arrangement. The scanner operates only in 3-dimensional (3D) mode because there are no interplane septa. Performance measurements on the G-PET scanner were made following National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 procedures for most measurements, although NU 2-1994 procedures were used when these were considered more appropriate for a brain scanner (e.g., scatter fraction and counting-rate performance measurements).
RESULTS: The transverse and axial resolutions near the center are 4.0 and 5.0 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 10 cm, these numbers deteriorate by approximately 0.5 mm. The absolute sensitivity of this scanner measured with a 70-cm long line source is 4.79 counts per second (cps)/kBq. The scatter fraction measured with a line source in a 20-cm-diameter x 19-cm-long cylinder is 39% (for a lower energy threshold of 410 keV). For the same cylinder, the peak noise equivalent counting rate is 60 kcps at an activity concentration of 7.4 kBq/mL (0.20 micro Ci/mL), whereas the peak true coincidence rate is 132 kcps at an activity concentration of 14 kBq/mL (0.38 micro Ci/mL). Images from the Hoffman brain phantom as well as (18)F-FDG patient scans illustrate the high quality of images acquired on the G-PET scanner.
CONCLUSION: The G-PET scanner attains the goal of high performance for brain imaging through the use of an Anger-logic GSO detector design with continuous optical coupling. This detector design leads to good energy resolution, which is needed in 3D imaging to minimize scatter and random coincidences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12902426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  17 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Marc C Huisman; Sybille Reder; Axel W Weber; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Weaving single photon imaging into new drug development.

Authors:  P David Mozley
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Primer on molecular imaging technology.

Authors:  Craig S Levin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Development of Dedicated Brain PET Imaging Devices: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  μ-Opioid receptor availability in the amygdala is associated with smoking for negative affect relief.

Authors:  Mary Falcone; Allison B Gold; E Paul Wileyto; Riju Ray; Kosha Ruparel; Andrew Newberg; Jacob Dubroff; Jean Logan; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Julie A Blendy; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Human Mu Opioid Receptor (OPRM1 A118G) polymorphism is associated with brain mu-opioid receptor binding potential in smokers.

Authors:  Riju Ray; Kosha Ruparel; Andrew Newberg; E Paul Wileyto; James W Loughead; Chaitanya Divgi; Julie A Blendy; Jean Logan; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Epilepsy Lesion Localization is not Predicted by Developmental Venous Anomaly Location or its FDG-PET Metabolic Activity.

Authors:  Jillian W Lazor; Joel M Stein; James Eric Schmitt; Kathryn A Davis; Seyed Ali Nabavizadeh
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  Recent developments in PET detector technology.

Authors:  Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Monte Carlo simulation studies on scintillation detectors and image reconstruction of brain-phantom tumors in TOFPET.

Authors:  Nagendra Nath Mondal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.