Literature DB >> 31662709

Microneedle System for Transdermal Drug and Vaccine Delivery: Devices, Safety, and Prospects.

Xiaoxiang He1, Jingyao Sun1, Jian Zhuang1, Hong Xu1, Ying Liu2, Daming Wu1,2.   

Abstract

Microneedle (MN) delivery system has been greatly developed to deliver drugs into the skin painlessly, noninvasively, and safety. In the past several decades, various types of MNs have been developed by the newer producing techniques. Briefly, as for the morphologically, MNs can be classified into solid, coated, dissolved, and hollow MN, based on the transdermal drug delivery methods of "poke and patch," "coat and poke," "poke and release," and "poke and flow," respectively. Microneedles also have other characteristics based on the materials and structures. In addition, various manufacturing techniques have been well-developed based on the materials. In this review, the materials, structures, morphologies, and fabricating methods of MNs are summarized. A separate part of the review is used to illustrate the application of MNs to deliver vaccine, insulin, lidocaine, aspirin, and other drugs. Finally, the review ends up with a perspective on the challenges in research and development of MNs, envisioning the future development of MNs as the next generation of drug delivery system.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug delivery methods; fabricating methods; materials; microneedle; structures; transdermal drug delivery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31662709      PMCID: PMC6794664          DOI: 10.1177/1559325819878585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


Introduction

Skin is an important organ evolved to protect the body against unwanted influences, such as excessive water loss, invasion of harmful chemicals, and to prevent the pathogens. There are 3 layers in human skin, including the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis.[1-3] The stratum corneum is part of the epidermis and the outermost skin layer, which is the primary barrier of skin and consists of 15 to 20 layers of corneocytes.[4-7] Transdermal drug delivery is an essential alternative to oral and hypodermic administrations to deliver drugs. Compared with oral and hypodermic administrations, transdermal drug delivery can overcome the problem of absorption and degradation of drugs occurring in the gastrointestinal tract or the liver; it is convenient, inexpensive, noninvasive, painless, and self-administrated; as well as it can provide sustained release of drugs to improve patient compliance.[2,8,9] However, the stratum corneum imposes significant restrictions on the successful delivery of drugs, especially the high-molecular-weight drugs.[1,10,11] Therefore, numerous technologies have been developed to enhance the permeability of drugs via stratum corneum, including chemical enhancement approaches, such as applying the chemical penetration enhancers, physical and electrical enhancement approaches, such as thermal ablation, electroporation, ultrasound, jet injection, and microneedles (MNs).[3,10,12] Generally speaking, these methods enhance the delivery of the drugs through stratum corneum either via pore formation or through improved diffusive interaction, and the principles and mechanisms of these methods have been illustrated well in the studies by Zhang[10] and Leite-Silva.[12] Hereinto, MN, as the novel technique to increase the permeability of drugs, has been used widely in recent years. Microneedle can be single or an array, consisting of hundreds or even thousands of microprojections, with a length up to 2 mm and a diameter up to hundreds of microns, which are attached to a base support.[13,14] The major advantage of MN delivery system is that the system can be used to penetrate into the skin noninvasively and painlessly to improve the safety and comfort for the patients.[2] In addition, MN delivery system can precisely deliver drugs from small molecules to macromolecule (eg, protein, insulin) and vaccine.[15] Since the first concept of MN was proposed as a drug delivery device in a US patent in 1971 by Gerstel and Place,[16] the MNs have been developed for delivery of drugs over several decades. Now, MN has been explored into various structures (out-of-plane MNs and in-plane MNs), materials (silicon, ceramic, glass, metal, and polymer), geometries (octagonal,[15] cylindrical,[17] rectangular,[18] pyramidal,[11,19-21] conical,[22,23,24] and quadrangular[25]), and morphologies, that is, solid MN (first reported in 1971 by Gerstel and Place[16]), hollow MN (first reported in 1971 by Gerstel and Place[16]), dissolving MN (first reported in 2005 by Miyano et al[26]), and coated MN (first reported in a patent in 1975 by Pistor[27]). Meanwhile, a variety of manufacturing techniques (such as etching, micromolding techniques, and lithography) for any MNs mentioned above, comprehensively considering the factors, including materials, structures, morphologies, geometry, and size, have also been reported in numbers of literatures. In this article, we pay attention to MN as a transdermal drugs delivery system and make an overview of the MN delivery system. First of all, types of MNs are summarized. After that, MNs fabricating techniques based on materials are summarized. Then, the applications of MNs in drug delivery are reviewed. Finally, a perspective on the challenges in research and development of MNs is illustrated. We hope this review, providing the basic information related to MNs, could be helpful for the further researching of MN delivery system.

Classification of MNs

The main purpose of MNs is to penetrate into skin via the microprojections, without hurting any nerves to improve the patient comfort and ensure the safety. Microneedles can be classified into different types based on the parameters, including drug delivery methods, materials, and structures.

Classified by Drug Delivery Methods

Solid MNs

Solid MNs are developed to deliver drugs into skin based on the mechanism of “poke-and-patch” approach. In this approach, solid MNs are penetrated into the skin to disrupt the stratum corneum and create transient microchannels and then a patch with the drug formulations is applied onto the skin so that the drug can diffuse slowly into the skin through the transient microchannels,[1,13,28-30] as shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 1.

Diagrams showing various microneedle drug delivery approaches. (A) Solid microneedles, for skin pretreatment to create microchannels, followed by the application of transdermal patch; (B) coated microneedles, for deposition of drug formulations into the skin, followed by removal of microneedles; (C) dissolving microneedles, incorporated into the substrate of microneedles, remaining in the skin and dissolving over time to release the drugs; and (D) hollow microneedles, for inserted into the skin and continuous infusion of drug through the created microchannels.

Diagrams showing various microneedle drug delivery approaches. (A) Solid microneedles, for skin pretreatment to create microchannels, followed by the application of transdermal patch; (B) coated microneedles, for deposition of drug formulations into the skin, followed by removal of microneedles; (C) dissolving microneedles, incorporated into the substrate of microneedles, remaining in the skin and dissolving over time to release the drugs; and (D) hollow microneedles, for inserted into the skin and continuous infusion of drug through the created microchannels. The solid MNs are efficient enough to enhance the delivery of drug with wide range of molecules. For examples, Zhang et al[31] fabricated the solid silicon MN arrays with the length of 150 µm to deliver peptides. The porcine ear skin was pretreated with solid MNs and then 4 types of peptides with different molecular weight were used to illustrate the drug permeability. The experiment results showed that the solid MN arrays promoted the delivery of peptides, but the peptides permeability decreased with the increase in molecular weight of peptides. Nayak et al[32] used the “poke-and-patch” method to enhance the permeation of lidocaine hydrochloride. Following solid MNs treatment about 5 minutes, lidocaine hydrochloride was efficiently delivered into the skin and crossed the minimum therapeutic drug threshold in less than 70 minutes. Recently, Bhatnagar et al[33] fabricated the MNs, containing 36 needles in 1 cm2 area, to deliver 2 antibreast cancer drugs, such as tamoxifen and gemcitabine. It was confirmed that the “poke-and-patch” approach greatly enhanced the permeation of gemcitabine.

Coated MNs

Coated MNs are used for transdermal drug delivery based on the “coat-and-poke” manner. Specifically, MNs coated with drug formulation are inserted into the skin, then the drugs dissolve from the MNs and enter into the skin, and finally MNs are pulled out of the skin,[29,34,35] as shown in Figure 1B. This approach is simple because it just takes one step to deliver the drug through the skin. However, the MNs can only be coated with a small amount of drugs, resulting in a very low drug delivery efficiency.[1] Multiple coating approaches have been developed, including dip-coating,[36,37] gas-jet drying,[38] spray coating,[39] electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA)-based process,[40] and ink-jet printing,[41-44] to overcome the drawback of drug wastage and loss, variable coating thickness, and inaccurate drug dosage. These coating approaches are illustrated well in Figure 2. Briefly, the dip-coating process is a simple process to coat the MNs. As shown in Figure 2A, the MNs are dipped into the formulation and then removed from the formulation to form a liquid film on the MNs. Finally, the liquid layer dries to form a solid film coating on the MNs. Gas-jet drying was proposed to overcome the slow drying process, which always induce the reducing and varying dose in the dip-coating process. The gas-jet can disperse a small amount of coating solution to wet the MNs, remove the excess coating solution, and dry the coating solution simultaneously, as shown in Figure 2B. Spray-coating process is similar to the conventional coating method to obtain the film coating on the MNs. As shown in Figure 2C, there are 3 steps to form the intact film coating. The spray coater generates the formulated microdroplets, such asatomization. After that, the droplets deposit and adhere onto the surface of the MNs and then the drops coalesce to form the film coating on the substrate. The principle of EHDA process is that the atomized droplets are produced by electrical force. The atomized liquids jet out of the capillary nozzle exit by jet and then are collected onto the electrically grounded substrate below the nozzle tip, as shown in Figure 2D. In the ink-jet printing process, as shown in Figure 2E, the microdroplets are ejected by a piezoelectric dispenser onto the surface of MNs to form the uniform, accurate, and reproducible coating films. The droplet size depends on the parameters, such as amplitude, pulse width, and excitation frequency. More illustrations of these approaches are discussed by Haj-Ahmad et al.[9]
Figure 2.

Illustration of coating approaches used to coat microneedles: (A) dip-coating, (B) gas-jet drying, (C) spray coating, and (D) electrohydrodynamic atomization–based process, and (E) ink-jet printing. (Images reprinted with permission from Haj-Ahmad et al.[9])

Illustration of coating approaches used to coat microneedles: (A) dip-coating, (B) gas-jet drying, (C) spray coating, and (D) electrohydrodynamic atomization–based process, and (E) ink-jet printing. (Images reprinted with permission from Haj-Ahmad et al.[9]) Besides, numbers of proper surfactants, such as utrol F-68 NF[36] and poloxamer 188,[38] and thickening agents, such as alginic acid[45] and CpG,[46] were used to facilitate MN coating, and stabilizer, such as trehalose, was used to reduce the damage of bioactive drugs in the process of coating/drying.[47] In addition, optimizing MN structures (eg, grooves,[48,49] pockets,[50] nanopatterning,[51] pores[52]) was employed to increase coating amounts or facilitate the delivery of drugs into the skin. Coated MNs can be used to deliver various drugs into the skin. For example, Baek et al[18] fabricated the biocompatible coated MNs made of poly (l-lactide) (PLLA), which were coated with optimized coating formation of lidocaine on the tips by the dip-coating device. It was confirmed that the PLLA MN arrays released rapidly the lidocaine into the phosphate-buffered saline within 2 minutes and into skin more efficiently than EMLA cream and provided rapid local anesthesia in a painless way. Gill and Prausnitz[50] designed the MNs with holes cut through the shafts to form “pockets,” which were dip coated with fluorescent model drugs and various surfactants and viscosity enhancers. It was concluded that the coated MNs released rapidly the model drugs after inserted into the skin, indicating the capabilities of MNs to control the drug delivery into skin. Additionally, Jung et al[51] designed the MNs with nanopatterns on the surface and dip coated with plasmid DNA vaccinations. It was concluded that the improved hydrophilicity of nanopatterned MNs induced to enhance the loading capacity of MNs. The in vivo study revealed that higher immune responses were induced by the nanopattered MNs than by unmodified MNs. In short, the above results proved that the coated MNs have a promising potential to deliver drugs in transdermal drug delivery systems.

Dissolving MNs

Dissolving MNs deliver drugs into skin based on the mechanism of “poke-and-release” method. Quite different from “poke-and-patch” method, drugs are usually encapsulated within MNs, and MNs remain on the skin after being inserted into the skin and then the drug releasing is realized when MNs completely degrade or dissolve in the skin,[1,8] as shown in Figure 1C. These MNs have various advantages, such as easily-made, convenient, and high drug loading.[53] Furthermore, these MNs can eventually dissolve in the skin, thus leaving no biohazardous sharp waste and ensuring a safe disposal for remaining MNs.[54] To date, minimally invasive dissolvable MNs are effective and convenient for transdermal drug delivery. Li et al[55] fabricated the dissolving MNs made of polylactic acid (PLA) for the delivery of insulin using thermal micromolding technique. The relationships between MN dimensions, drug concentration, drug viscosity, administration time, and drug penetration into the skin were discussed. It was concluded that the shorter MNs had a better mechanical stability, while the longer MNs were more appropriate for drug permeation. The increasing of drug concentration induced the increasing of drug permeation amount, but not affected the drug permeation rate. However, with the increase in drug viscosity, the drug permeation amount decreased. Prolonging the administration time on the skin at 1 hour, the drug permeation amount achieved to a stable value and essentially unchanged after 1 hour. The in vivo study revealed that dissolving MN system promoted the insulin absorption to reduce the blood glucose levels to 29% of initial level at 5 hours. Bhatnagar et al[20] fabricated the dissolvable MNs made of the mixture of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for the codelivery of doxorubicin and docetaxel. It was concluded that the pyramidal-shaped MNs fully dissolved within 1 hour after inserted into the excised skin, reduced the tumor volume and tumor weight in 4T1 tumor-bearing athymic nude mice, and indicated greater survival compared with intratumoral injection. Besides, Sullivan et al[54] fabricated the PVP MNs to deliver influenza vaccine. In detail, the MNs have a length of 650 µm and a diameter of 20 µm in the tip. The MNs dissolved 89% ± 3% (by mass) after 5 minutes application in ex vivo study and 83% ± 6% (by mass) after 15 minutes application in in vivo study and induced a strong cellular and humoral immune response after a single immunization with a low antigen dose, which can confer protective immunity against fatal viral challenge.

Hollow MNs

Hollow MN deliver drugs via the “poke-and-flow” approach. Similar to the hypodermic injection, the liquid drug can continuously flow into the skin via the holes in the hollow MNs driven by the pressure, as shown in Figure 1D. Hence, the flow rate of drug can be accurately controlled by special equipment, such as micropump.[34] Comparing with the solid MNs, hollow MNs are likely to promote force-driven fluid flow, thereby allowing faster drug delivery rates. Furthermore, the painless, long-term, and continuous drug delivery can be achieved by hollow MNs with precise and tunable dosage according to the need of the patients. Hollow MNs have also been extensively used to deliver various drugs. For examples, Vinayakumar et al[56] developed a hollow stainless MN to deliver insulin into a diabetic rat. In detail, the hollow MN array with a height of 300 µm and an outer diameter of 110 µm at tip and 150 µm at the base was fabricated using femtosecond laser micromachining. The insulin was delivered into the dermis of the rat skin through hollow MN by peristaltic pump. The insulin successfully diffused into the blood stream and the blood glucose level significantly decreased to the normal level after 5 hours, indicating that the hollow MNs can efficiently replace the subcutaneous insulin delivery. Pamornpathomkul et al[57] used the hollow MNs combined with a nanocarrier delivery system to deliver plasmid DNA vaccine encoding ovalbumin. It was concluded that this complex system was good at enhancing the permeation of plasmid DNA vaccine encoding ovalbumin into skin, without inducing infection or pinpoint bleeding and inducing a strong immunoglobulin G immune response. Besides, hollow MNs are suitable for the blood extraction based on the transportation mechanism of poke and flow. Li et al[58] fabricated a hollow MN by drawing lithography technique. In detail, the hollow MN with a bevel angle of 15° has a length, inner diameter, and tip diameter of 1800, 60, and 120 μm, respectively. The hollow MNs are penetrated into the skin without rupture and extracts 20 mL mouse blood in vivo, indicating that the hollow MNs have potential applications in blood analysis systems for diagnosis.

Classified by Structure of MNs

Microneedles can be divided into 2 types based on the structures, including in-plane and out-of-plane MNs. The out-of-plane MNs show that the length of MNs is perpendicular to the substrate,[59-61] as shown in Figure 3A. It is easy to enhance the efficiency of drug delivery on large areas of skin by out-of-plane MNs through increasing the density of MN arrays. Out-of-plane MNs can be hollow or solid MNs. Furthermore, it is also easy to manufacture the out-of-plane MNs, and the out-of-plane MNs have widely used to deliver drugs, as shown in Table 1. However, it is a challenging task to fabricate the out-of-plane MNs with high aspect ratio structures.[69] In contrast, the in-plane MNs show that the length of MNs is parallel to the substrate,[69,70] as shown in Figure 3B. The in-plane MNs can be produced into production with a wide range of lengths and easily combined with the microfluid chip techniques, but the density of in-plane MNs cannot be high enough.[1,2,8,113] Until now, only some literatures have been reported related to the in-plane MNs to deliver drugs, as shown in Table 1. For examples, Li et al[70] fabricated the in-plane silicon MNs with conical structure, tapering smoothly from the base to the apex by micromachining method. The surface of the MNs was treated with oxygen plasma to make the surface hydrophilic. These in-plane MNs were robust enough to penetrate porcine skin, being intact after the repetitive penetration. Khandan[81] developed the in-plane titanium (Ti)-based MNs for passive ocular drug delivery. In detail, the in-plane MNs with length from 500 to 1500 μm, width from 50 to 200 μm, thickness of 50 μm, and needle tip angle of 60° were developed using methods of photolithographic patterning and dry-etching. The results showed that the MNs were stiffness enough for reliable corneal insertion and provided potential for enhanced safety. Additionally, Kolli and Banga[25] fabricated the solid maltose in-plane MNs for transdermal delivery. The in-plane MNs were manufactured to be 508.46 ± 9.32 µm in length with a radius of curvature of 3 µm at the tip, and to create microchannels with 55.42 ± 8.66 µm in diameter in the skin to improve the delivery of nicardipine hydrochloride.
Figure 3.

(A) Out-of-plane and (B) in-plane microneedles.

Table 1.

Overview of Microneedle Arrays Manufactured by Various Methods Based on Materials.

Method/MaterialMicroneedles TypeStructureReferences
Inorganic materials
 Wet-etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [62]
 Wet-etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [63]
 Wet-etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [64]
 Wet-etching/siliconHollow MNOut-of-plane [61]
 Dry-etching/siliconSolid MNIn-plane [65]
 Dry-etching/siliconHollow MNOut-of-plane [66]
 Dry-etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [67]
 Reactive ion etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [68]
 Deep reactive ion etching/siliconHollow MNOut-of-plane [69]
 Deep reactive ion etching/siliconSolid MNIn-plane [70]
 Deep reactive ion etching/siliconSolid MNOut-of-plane [71]
 Deep reactive ion etching/siliconHollow MNOut-of-plane [72]
 Electrochemical micromachining/siliconHollow MNOut-of-plane [73]
 Micromolding/ceramicSolid MNOut-of-plane [74]
 Micromolding/bioceramicSolid MNOut-of-plane [75]
 Micromolding/bioceramicSolid MNOut-of-plane [76]
 Micromolding/bioceramicSolid MNOut-of-plane [77]
 Two photon polymerization micromolding and pulsed laser deposition/ceramicSolid MNOut-of-plane [78]
Metal MNs
 Micromolding/TiSolid MNOut-of-plane [79]
 Wire-electrode cutting and wet-etching/TiSolid MNOut-of-plane [80]
 Dry-etching/TiSolid MNIn-plane [81]
 Sputter deposition/TiHollow MNOut-of-plane [82]
 Laser cutting/TiSolid MNIn-plane [83]
 Laser cutting/SSSolid MNOut-of-plane [84]
 Laser cutting/SSSolid MNOut-of-plane [85]
 Laser cutting/SSSolid MNIn-plane [86]
 Laser cutting/SSSolid MNIn-plane [87]
 Laser cutting/SSCoated MNIn-plane [47]
 EDM and femtosecond laser machining/SSHollow MNOut-of-plane [56]
 EDM/SSSolid MNOut-of-plane [88]
 Mechanical dicing and electrochemical corrosion/SSSolid MNOut-of-plane [89]
 Micromilling/SSSolid MNOut-of-plane [90]
 Electroplating/NiSolid MNOut-of-plane [91]
 Electrodeposition/NiHollow MNOut-of-plane [92]
 Electrodeposition/NiHollow MNOut-of-plane [93]
Polymeric MNs
 Hot embossing/PLLACoated MNOut-of-plane [48]
 Hot embossing/PMMASolid MNOut-of-plane [92]
 Hot embossing/PLACoated MN/dissolving MNOut-of-plane [94]
 Hot embossing/PLGADissolving MNOut-of-plane [95]
 Hot embossing/PCLDissolving MNOut-of-plane [96]
 Injection/PMMASolid MNOut-of-plane [97]
 Injection/PGADissolving MNOut-of-plane [98]
 Injection/nylon-6Solid MNOut-of-plane [98]
 Injection/liquid crystal polymerCoated MNOut-of-plane [99]
 Injection/polycarbonateHollow MNOut-of-plane [100]
 Micromolding/PLADissolving MNOut-of-plane [55]
 Micromolding/PGA, PLA, PLGADissolving MNOut-of-plane [101]
 Micromolding/PCLDissolving MNOut-of-plane [102]
 Micromolding/PVADissolving MNOut-of-plane [103]
 Casting/mixture of PVA and PVPDissolving MNOut-of-plane [104]
 Casting/mixture of PVA, dextran, and CMCDissolving MNOut-of-plane [105]
 Casting/mixture of CMC and APDissolving MNOut-of-plane [106]
 Casting/PGADissolving MNOut-of-plane [107]
 Photolithography/PEGDASolid MNOut-of-plane [108]
 Photolithography/PEGDASolid MNOut-of-plane [109]
 Photolithography/PEGDASolid MNOut-of-plane [110]
 Heat imprint lithography/PLADissolving MNOut-of-plane [111]
 Laser writing/SU-8Hollow MNOut-of-plane [5]
 3-Dimensional printing/PLADissolving MNOut-of-plane [112]

Abbreviations: AP, amylopectin; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose; EDM, electric discharge machining; MNs, microneedles; PEGDA, polyethylene glycol diacrylate; PCL, polycaprolactone; PGA, polyglycolic acid; PLA, polylactic acid; PLGA, polylactic-co-glycolic acid; PLLA, poly (l-lactide); PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol; PVP, polyvinylpyrrolidone; SS, stainless steel.

(A) Out-of-plane and (B) in-plane microneedles. Overview of Microneedle Arrays Manufactured by Various Methods Based on Materials. Abbreviations: AP, amylopectin; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose; EDM, electric discharge machining; MNs, microneedles; PEGDA, polyethylene glycol diacrylate; PCL, polycaprolactone; PGA, polyglycolic acid; PLA, polylactic acid; PLGA, polylactic-co-glycolic acid; PLLA, poly (l-lactide); PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol; PVP, polyvinylpyrrolidone; SS, stainless steel.

Classified by Materials of MNs

Traditionally, materials used for MNs are inorganic materials, metals, and polymer. We subsequently introduce each type of materials in detail.

Inorganic materials

The inorganic materials used to fabricate MNs are silicon,[62,63,70,114] glass,[115-117] and ceramic.[74,75] Until now, the inorganic materials have been used as structural materials to fabricate solid MNs, coated MNs, and hollow MNs.[39,61,63-65,70,75,76,118] Hereinto, silicon is the most common inorganic materials for manufacturing various MNs. The silicon is relative high hardness; therefore, the silicon MNs are easily to be penetrated into skin. However, silicon MNs are easy to break off during the process of insertion into the skin due to the fragile property. Therefore, these MNs may stay underneath the skin after used and induce inflammation because silicon is not well established as biocompatible materials like some polymers and metals (such as Ti, stainless steel [SS]), which limits their wide applications.[1,8,66] Glass is also a kind of brittle material, and the glass MNs may meet the same problems after penetrated into skin. Ceramic has generated great interest from researchers over years and also widely been used to produce MNs. Alumina, zirconia, and calcium sulfate hemihydrate are commonly used to fabricate MNs. However, most sintered ceramics (eg, alumina) are brittle and nonresorbable, which may induce unwanted inflammation after breaking in the skin.[75,119] Hence, biodegradable bioceramic MNs (BCMNs) have been developed and proved to have improved mechanical strength to be penetrated into the skin, without keeping so much biohazardous sharp waste in the skin. Moreover, the BCMNs can control the drug release well via controlling the factors, such as the porosity, surface, and degradation.[75,76]

Metal

Various metals, such as SS,[51,61,84,88] Ti,[81,83,120] and nickel (Ni),92 have been used as structural materials to fabricate solid MNs, coated MNs, and hollow MNs. Metals have strong mechanical strength and toughness for the transdermal drug delivery system.[53] However, metals are nonbiodegradable, which may produce unwanted biohazardous tip waste induced by the broken MNs left behind in the skin, even though some metals, such as SS and Ti, have been safely used as biomaterials in medical treatment for decades.[121,122]

Polymer

Nowadays, polymeric MNs have attracted great attention of researchers because most polymeric MNs are biocompatible and biodegradable to avoid harsh side effects in the skin, providing a safe device for the delivery of drugs.[30,104,112,123] Polymeric materials have been efficiently fabricated into solid MNs, coated MNs, dissolving MNs, and hollow MNs, including polymethyl methacrylate,[21,97,124] PLA,[55,94,112] polyglycolic acid,[101,98] polylactic-co-glycolic acid),[95,125] PVP,[22,54,104,126] polycaprolactone (PCL),[102,127] PVA,[103,105] and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC).[106,128,129] However, most polymers are too soft to induce the buckling failure during the insertion process.[8] Therefore, some complex structural materials such as PCL-polyethylene glycol (PCL/PEG),[127] CMC-amylopectin,[106] PVP-cyclodextrin,[130] and PVA-PLA[131] are used to prepare the MNs to increase the mechanical strength during insertion process. Besides, geometry properties of polymeric MNs have been investigated well to improve the mechanical strength. For example, Li et al[55] systemically investigated the mechanical stability of PLA MNs, evaluated by the relationship between percentage of successful insertions and the number of MNs on the patch. In detail, the MN array with heights of 0, 600, 700, and 800 µm were prepared and used to treat porcine cadaver skins. The results showed that the MN patches with lower height resulted in better mechanical strength. Chen et al[102] fabricated MNs with various types of aspect ratio and the results demonstrated that the MNs with a smaller aspect ratio also exhibited higher mechanical strength. Gittard et al[132] also proved that a decrease in the aspect ratio of MN induced to an increase in mechanical strength. Recently, a type of MN array with separable arrowhead was fabricated. This MN array combines the mechanical strength of metal and dissolving property of polymer to eliminate biohazardous sharp waste and improve strength of MNs so as to be penetrated into skin for the enhancing capacity of delivering drugs.[133] Other materials such as sugars (eg, maltose, trehalose, sucrose) are also attractive materials to fabricate the dissolving MNs. For example, Loizidou et al[134] fabricated the MNs based on sugar materials of CMC/maltose, CMC/trehalose, and CMC/sucrose, respectively, by the vacuum deposition method. Nguyen and Banga[135] also prepared the MNs based on maltose by micromolding technique. The maltose MNs can rapidly dissolve and increase the permeability of drugs through skin.

Fabrication of MNs

To accurately produce the microstructures of the MNs, many researchers have attempted to develop fabricating methods of MNs based on the materials. Table 1 presents an overview of various techniques to fabricate the MNs made of polymer, inorganic materials, and metal.

Fabrication of Inorganic Material MNs

Since the first solid MNs made of silicon by reactive ion etching (RIE)[136] was reported, the techniques to fabricate the silicon MNs have been developed for years. Not only wet-etching and dry-etching but also electrochemical micromachining have already been used to fabricate silicon MNs, such as solid, hollow, in-plane, and out-of-plane MNs. These methods have also been used together to make silicon MNs. For example, Jurčíček et al[61] prepared the hollow silicon MNs with a height of more than 100 µm and a hole diameter of 10 to 25 µm under the condition of 40% KOH solution and a water bath temperature of 87°C using the deep RIE and anisotropic wet-etching technique. These manufacturing techniques in Table 1 offer the potential for high production of MNs, but the processing of some methods for making silicon MNs requires clean room and the manufacturing methods for MNs are relative expensive and complicated.[2,8,35] Micromolding is the most common method to make BCMNs or ceramic MNs. Generally, in this fabricating method, the MN master templates were first prepared by microfabrication methods, after that the ceramic slurry was filled into the cavities of molds, and then the ceramic MNs were formed when the ceramic materials were dried.[119] Traditionally, poly(dimethyl siloxane) mold[74,77] was usually used to fabricate ceramic MNs or BCMNs with nanopores. The porosity, grain size, and morphology of MNs can be controlled well through slurry process.[137] Cai et al[76] have prepared the BCMNs with flexible and self-swelling substrate (BCMN-Gs) by the micromolding technique. The process of micromolding technique used to produce this BCMNs is illustrated in Figure 4. Briefly, the homogenous paste, which is the mixture of α calcium sulfate hemihydrate and water, was filled in the cavities of the negative replica and then the needles formed after cured in the ambient conditions. Finally, the warmed gelatin solution was poured on the top of the mold and cross-linked in the desiccators overnight under ambient conditions. In addition, 2 photon polymerization micromolding was also developed to fabricate the ceramic MNs.[78,138]
Figure 4.

Micromolding process to fabricate BCMN-G. BCMN-G indicates bioceramic microneedle with gelatin substrate. (Images reprinted with permission from Cai et al.[76])

Micromolding process to fabricate BCMN-G. BCMN-G indicates bioceramic microneedle with gelatin substrate. (Images reprinted with permission from Cai et al.[76]) Glass MNs are usually manufactured by pulling of glass rods using pipette puller.[115-117,139] For example, Mahadevan et al[116] used a pipette puller to fabricate the glass MNs based on borosilicate glass capillary tubes. Peter et al[139] fabricated the MNs with fine gradually tapered shape (angles between 0.02° and 0.66°) by pulling of borosilicate glass rods using a micropipette puller. The MNs were cut into different finial length by platinum wire. After that, the tips were fire polished until smooth and then the MNs were bent into a 90° cantilever by the microforge.

Fabrication of Metal MNs

Ti and SS are the 2 types of metals to fabricate MNs due to their biocompatibility and good fracture toughness. Various fabricating methods, including dry-etching, wet-etching, laser cutting, electroplating (or electrodeposition), micromilling, electric discharge machining (EDM), and micromolding techniques, have been used either alone or in combination to make Ti or SS MNs, as shown in Table 1. Ni, as a common metal, has also been used to make hollow and solid MNs by electrodeposition or electroplating. Other methods, such as twisted-light laser ablation[140] and electrochemical corrosion, have been developed to make metal MNs. Hereinto, electrodeposition and laser machining are often used to produce the hollow metal MNs.

Fabrication of Polymeric MNs

Polymer materials are now widely used to fabricate the MNs because polymers are inexpensive and easy to mass production due to their uncomplicated fabrication and low cost.[1,3,141-143] The most common manufacturing technique for polymeric MNs is micromolding method, including hot embossing, injection, and casting.[144-148] After the master mold for MNs are fabricated, MNs can be produced efficiently and stably via micromolding techniques until the mold breaks. These maser molds with desired microstructures were usually produced via techniques such as LIGA (the abbreviation of lithographie, galvanoformung, and abformung), EDM, micromilling and microgrinding techniques, and laser percussion drilling, which have been described in detail in the reference.[149] Other methods, such as photolithography, heat imprint lithography, and laser writing, were also used to fabricate polymeric MNs. Dardano et al[108] have used the photolithographic approach to fabricate MNs made of polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) with different shape, length, and tip. In the group of Kang,[109,110] photolithographic approach was widely used to prepare the polymeric MNs. Recently, the 3-dimensional printing has been developed for polymeric MNs. All these methods have been achieved based on the advantage of versatility of polymer, including viscosity, dissolution properties, and postmodification.[13,150-156]

Application of MNs

Microneedles are convenient, safe, and painless enough to achieve the comfort of patient and now widely used in transdermal, ocular, and intracellular delivery.[10,12,34,131] Hereinto, transdermal drug delivery is the main area for the application of MNs.

Microneedle Delivery of Vaccine

Traditionally, most vaccines are administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously, and the route of administration is relatively painful. Today, MNs array system has been widely studied for delivery of vaccine and is comparable to the conventional routes of administration. DNA vaccines are considered to be the effective candidates of conventional vaccines because they can generate strong cellular and humoral immune responses, are inexpensively, and can be manufactured easily.[51,157,158] However, DNA vaccines often exhibit an immune response weaker than expected when administered intramuscularly to patients because of the low efficient delivery of plasmid DNA into host cell, which induces the low expression of encoded antigen.[159] Thus, a suitable DNA vaccines delivery system is considered a key method to improve the immunization results. Microneedles can deliver DNA vaccine into the skin to improve the immune responses induced by the enhancing expression of encoded antigen and become an effective delivering method for DNA vaccines. Kim et al[158] used the MNs coated with pH-responsive polyelectrolyte multilayer assembly to deliver functional polyplexes containing DNA vaccines. It was concluded that in in vivo experiment on mice, compared with the traditional subcutaneous injection method, MNs were able to release polyplexes rapidly into skin and induced strong humoral immune response. The mechanism of polyplexes containing DNA vaccine releasing from MNs is shown in Figure 5A. In brief, after the 16 bilayers of heparin and albumin were coated alternatively on the MNs, cationic polyplexes containing plasmid DNA were deposited on the outermost of heparin film layers via electrostatic interaction. Finally, multilayer films rapidly disintegrated to release polyplexes from MN arrays after inserted into skin at pH 7.4. In addition, Man-DA3 is utilized to form the polyplexes for target gene delivery to the resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) into dermis, and dermal APCs can express high levels of mannose receptors and mannose receptor-related receptors. The mechanism of delivery of polyplexes with surface mannose moieties into intradermal resident APCs after release from the MNs was illustrated in Figure 5B.
Figure 5.

(A) Description of functional polyplexes released from MNs coated with pH-responsive PMA after applied on the skin. (B) Illustration of delivery of polyplexes with surface mannose moieties to intradermal resident APCs after releasing from MNs. APC indicates antigen-presenting cells; MNs microneedles; PMA, polyelectrolyte multilayer assembly. (Images reprinted with permission from Kim et al.[158])

(A) Description of functional polyplexes released from MNs coated with pH-responsive PMA after applied on the skin. (B) Illustration of delivery of polyplexes with surface mannose moieties to intradermal resident APCs after releasing from MNs. APC indicates antigen-presenting cells; MNs microneedles; PMA, polyelectrolyte multilayer assembly. (Images reprinted with permission from Kim et al.[158]) Zhang et al[159] conducted the experiment of delivery of DNA vaccine by MNs with pyramid shape on the shaved mouse ear pinna or dorsal skin. The results showed that the MNs can be superior to conventional syringe injection in respect of both protein expression resulting from intradermal delivery of DNA vaccine and immunogenicity. Microneedles also prolonged the protein expression compared to the syringe injection. For example, MN delivery gave a 18.6-fold higher level of green fluorescent protein expression in the ear and more than 4-fold higher in dorsal skin than syringe injection. Every year, there is about 3 to 5 million serious diseases and 250 000 to 500 000 deaths induced by influenza.[160,161] Vaccination is the main method to control seasonal influenza via improving protection against the illness and reducing the risk of death and hospitalization caused by influenza-related complications.[162] The MNs array system has been investigated for influenza immunization due to the efficient and precise delivery of vaccine. Kim et al[47] used the fabricated SS-coated MNs to deliver influenza vaccine into skin. After coating the SS MNs with the optimized vaccine formulation, vaccine delivered into the skin via MNs induced strong systemic and functional antibodies, and provided complete protection against fatal challenge infection, similar to conventional intramuscular injection. Later on, Kim et al[45] investigated the SS-coated MNs to deliver influenza virus-like particle vaccine into skin. It was also concluded that the vaccine generated strong antibody response and provided full protection against high-dose fatal challenge infection. Numbers of human trials for assessing the safety, tolerability, and immune response generation with various MN devices, such as MicronJet (Nanopass Technologies Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel)[160] and BD Soluvia (New Jersey, USA),[163] have been conducted. Bhatnagar et al[2] have already reviewed in detail the successful application of these MN devices on the delivery of influenza vaccine and the results reveal that the influenza vaccine is well against influenza. In summary, MN array system provides an important advance in the delivery of vaccine to enhance the strong cellular immunity, indicating that MNs will have a great influence on drugs used for vaccination in the future.

Microneedle Delivery of Insulin

Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic diseases caused by abnormal insulin level in the whole world. Its main manifestations are increased glucose production in the liver and decreased clearance of glucose into muscle and fat, resulting in obvious hyperglycemia in the blood.[10,164-165] There is approximately 425 million adults suffering from diabetes, and the number of globally diabetic patients is estimated to be 439 million by 2030.[10,53,166] Insulin administration is required to control blood glucose levels for patients suffering from various types of diabetes. Traditionally, the delivery of insulin is conducted by methods ranging from smaller gauge needles to insulin pen to insulin jet injector and to insulin pump.[167] However, the exogenous insulin delivered by these methods does not closely match the physiological release of insulin, which often causes inadequate glycemic control and subsequent negative consequences. For example, too low dose of insulin will induce the blindness and kidney failure for patients, while too high dose of insulin will induce hypoglycemia, which will cause seizures, loss of consciousness, and even death.[53] Microneedle delivery system is the expected technique to deliver the insulin, closely matching the need of patient. Numbers of published literatures have grown steadily these years, showing that the MN delivery system is attractive carrier for insulin delivery. Ling and Chen[168] fabricated a dissolving MN patch composed of starch and gelatin for the transdermal delivery of insulin to diabetic rats. The dissolving MNs were administrated by a homemade applicator to the diabetic rat, as shown in Figure 6. It was concluded that the dissolving MNs are strength enough to penetrate into skin painlessly and completely dissolve after being inserted into the skin for 5 minutes. Insulin was rapidly released into skin, resulting in similar hypoglycemic effect in rats like a subcutaneous injection.
Figure 6.

The schematic illustration of the microneedles used for delivery of insulin. (Images reprinted with permission from Ling and Chen.[168])

The schematic illustration of the microneedles used for delivery of insulin. (Images reprinted with permission from Ling and Chen.[168]) Resnik et al[118] used the hollow silicon MNs with length of 220 μm, out diameter of 130 μm, and inner diameter of 50 µm to deliver insulin. The in vivo results implied that the hollow MNs improved transdermal delivery of fast-acting insulin without causing any skin irritation or inflammation at the delivery sites. At almost the same injection dose, compared with the subcutaneous injection, hollow MNs showed no significant decrease in glucose level, but significant increase in serum insulin. Zhang et al[169] used the calcium ion cross-linked alginate/maltose composite MNs with pyramidal shape to deliver insulin into rats. These prepared MNs exhibited strong mechanical properties with the maximum failure force of about 0.41 N/needle to be penetrated into the skin. It was concluded that the MNs successfully triggered the releasing of insulin and had obvious and effective hypoglycemic effect compared with subcutaneous injection. Additionally, Yu et al[77] used the fabricated BCMNs for insulin transdermal delivery. The made MNs were strength enough to be penetrated into skin. Insulin released from the MNs also exhibited an effective and obvious hypoglycemic effect. There are still many other literatures related to insulin delivered by MNs, which have not been illustrated in this review. Jin et al[170] have comprehensively introduced the MNs for insulin delivery in clinical trials. It was indicated that the MNs for insulin delivery are expected to pave the way for noninvasive regulation of glucose level for diabetic patients.

Microneedle Delivery of Other Drugs

Lidocaine is a class drug for local anesthesia and is usually delivered for pre- and postoperative anesthesia either alone or in combination with other drugs.[99,171] Transcutaneous injection are often used to deliver lidocaine. However, the traditional method can cause local and systemic effect to the patients, including unpleasant feeling (eg, fear, pain, anxiety), erythema, and edema occurred in topical application, increasing risk of unexpected diffusion and inadequate placement of lidocaine.[172,173] Hence, MN delivery system has been investigated to be an alternative traditional delivery method of lidocaine. Kathuria et al[171] used the MNs made of PEGDA by photolithography to deliver lidocaine into skin. The in vitro and in vivo experiment results showed that MN can deliver lidocaine into the skin perpendicularly and release the active ingredient to alleviate acute and chronic pain. Zhang et al[99] fabricated the coated MNs via injection. The lidocaine was coated to the MNs by dip-coating process. The MN was used to deliver lidocaine into the skin of swine. The in vivo results revealed that the lidocaine dissolved rapidly off the MNs into skin within seconds and induced local analgesia about 1 minute, facilitating routine or emergency procedures. Additionally, Baek et al[18] also prepared the coated MNs made of PLLA using micromolding technique for the delivery of lidocaine into porcine ears. Dip-coating device was used to coat lidocaine onto the MNs. The results revealed that the lidocaine on the MNs was released into phosphate-buffered saline within 2 minutes and its storages stability could last for 3 weeks at different temperatures. These MNs also showed more efficient delivery of lidocaine than the commercial EMLA cream. Acetyl salicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is commonly used for pain relief and anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular treatment. Due to the gastrointestinal side effects and low bioavailability of oral administration, MNs delivery system is becoming an alternative method for the delivery of ASA.[174,175] Olatunji et al[175] conducted the experiment on the delivery of ASA on the porcine skin. The result revealed that the release of ASA from fish scale biopolymer transdermal patches via the “poke-and-patch” method was greatly enhanced after pretreating the porcine skin with the solid metal MNs. In addition, MNs are widely used to deliver other large-molecular-weight drugs, such as protein,[28,176] DNA,[177,178] and peptides,[31,179] and small-molecular-weight drugs, such as dyclonine developed for topical anesthesia,[180] zolmitriptan developed for acute treatment of migraine,[181] naltrexone used to treat opiate and alcohol dependence,[182] and so on. Besides, MNs can be also one of the methods used to detect the tumors[183,184] and to continuously real time monitor alcohol,[185] glucose,[186] and so on for patients, since they can be penetrated into skin with negligible damage or pain.

Conclusions and Outlook

After the first MN reported for the drug delivery in 1971, MNs have been developed over 4 decades. Compared to the traditional drug delivery system, MNs have been demonstrated to be safe and successful enough to deliver various drugs. So far, MNs have been made of a variety of materials, including polymers, metals, silicon, ceramics, glass, and sugar. Researchers have already made great achievements in the fabrication techniques of MNs based on these materials. Solid, coated, dissolved, and hollow MNs have been developed to deliver drugs with wide range of molecules. Furthermore, the in-plane and out-of-plane MNs are also fabricated for the special requirement in the delivery of drugs. Despite great successes of the MNs in the transdermal drug and vaccine delivery, there still exist some challenges for the long-term use of MNs. One of the challenges of MNs is that although doses and delivering rate of drug can be controlled well by MNs through some devices, and some MNs can be used to monitor situation of patients, most current MNs are unable to change the delivery parameters in time upon the changing condition of patients. Hence, it is urgent to develop the super-MNs in the future, which are consisted of MNs, biosensor, bioelectronics, automation, and so on, and are able to monitor patient conditions, rapidly change the delivery parameters (such as pH, temperature, and dose) in response to the information of patient, realize the diagnostic and treatment purpose simultaneously, and increase the compliance of patient with the minimal side effects. In addition, there are already some MN devices on the market, which have brought good clinical outcomes for the delivery of insulin, influenza vaccine, and lidocaine. However, most MNs are still in experimental phases. To move more MNs into market further, narrowing the gap between laboratory research and clinical applications is a must in the future. To achieve this goal, manufacturing process should be optimized and validated to the current manufacturing standards, and more comprehensive in vivo study and clinical trials are important to achieve the requirements of regulatory system. Moreover, MNs should be designed well to balance the pain, mechanical strength, quantity of drugs, and stable drug formulation; be fabricated with a relatively low cost to obtain sufficient and reproducible penetration; and be easily handled by all patients. In spite of these problems, due to the unique properties of MNs, more efficient and advanced MN system will be developed for the market in the near future. Definitely, MNs system for transdermal drug and vaccine delivery will have a great impact on the future medicine.
  126 in total

1.  Microneedle pretreatment improves efficacy of cutaneous topical anesthesia.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Li; Rongsheng Zhao; Zelian Qin; Jie Zhang; Suodi Zhai; Yuqin Qiu; Yunhua Gao; Bai Xu; Stephen H Thomas
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 2.  Pharmaceutical and biomaterial engineering via electrohydrodynamic atomization technologies.

Authors:  Prina Mehta; Rita Haj-Ahmad; Manoochehr Rasekh; Muhammad S Arshad; Ashleigh Smith; Susanna M van der Merwe; Xiang Li; Ming-Wei Chang; Zeeshan Ahmad
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Development of lidocaine-coated microneedle product for rapid, safe, and prolonged local analgesic action.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Ken Brown; Kris Siebenaler; Amy Determan; Daniel Dohmeier; Kris Hansen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Nano-patterning of a stainless steel microneedle surface to improve the dip-coating efficiency of a DNA vaccine and its immune response.

Authors:  Daeyoon Jung; N Sanoj Rejinold; Jeong-Eun Kwak; Su-Hyung Park; Yeu-Chun Kim
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.268

5.  Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch.

Authors:  Mark Peyrot; Darlene Dreon; Vivien Zraick; Brett Cross; Meng H Tan
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccination in renal transplant patients who were non-responders to conventional influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Emmanuel Morelon; Claire Pouteil Noble; Sameh Daoud; Remi Cahen; Catherine Goujon-Henry; Françoise Weber; Philippe E Laurent; Dominique Kaiserlian; Jean-François Nicolas
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Zein Microneedles for Localized Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Agents to Treat Breast Cancer: Drug Loading, Release Behavior, and Skin Permeation Studies.

Authors:  Shubhmita Bhatnagar; Pooja Kumari; Srijanaki Paravastu Pattarabhiran; Venkata Vamsi Krishna Venuganti
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Microneedle patches: usability and acceptability for self-vaccination against influenza.

Authors:  James J Norman; Jaya M Arya; Maxine A McClain; Paula M Frew; Martin I Meltzer; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Application of a three-microneedle device for the delivery of local anesthetics.

Authors:  Kayoko Ishikawa; Hidekazu Fukamizu; Tetsuya Takiguchi; Yusuke Ohta; Yoshiki Tokura
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  In Vivo Expansion of Melanoma-Specific T Cells Using Microneedle Arrays Coated with Immune-Polyelectrolyte Multilayers.

Authors:  Qin Zeng; Joshua M Gammon; Lisa H Tostanoski; Yu-Chieh Chiu; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-09-01
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Potential of Microneedle Systems for COVID-19 Vaccination: Current Trends and Challenges.

Authors:  Jasmin Hassan; Charlotte Haigh; Tanvir Ahmed; Md Jasim Uddin; Diganta B Das
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 2.  Emerging skin-targeted drug delivery strategies to engineer immunity: A focus on infectious diseases.

Authors:  Emrullah Korkmaz; Stephen C Balmert; Cara Donahue Carey; Geza Erdos; Louis D Falo
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.129

Review 3.  Progress in Microneedle-Mediated Protein Delivery.

Authors:  Rezvan Jamaledin; Concetta Di Natale; Valentina Onesto; Zahra Baghban Taraghdari; Ehsan Nazarzadeh Zare; Pooyan Makvandi; Raffaele Vecchione; Paolo Antonio Netti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Parametric study of 3D printed microneedle (MN) holders for interstitial fluid (ISF) extraction.

Authors:  Robert M Taylor; Dilendra Maharjan; Fernando Moreu; Justin T Baca
Journal:  Microsyst Technol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 2.276

5.  A biodegradable microneedle sheet for intracorporeal topical hemostasis.

Authors:  Mao Yokoyama; Namie Chihara; Atsushi Tanaka; Yosuke Katayama; Akira Taruya; Yuko Ishida; Mitsuru Yuzaki; Kentaro Honda; Yoshiharu Nishimura; Toshikazu Kondo; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Microarray patches enable the development of skin-targeted vaccines against COVID-19.

Authors:  Emrullah Korkmaz; Stephen C Balmert; Tina L Sumpter; Cara Donahue Carey; Geza Erdos; Louis D Falo
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 7.  Physical Enhancement? Nanocarrier? Current Progress in Transdermal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Noriyuki Uchida; Masayoshi Yanagi; Hiroki Hamada
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  Microneedle-based insulin transdermal delivery system: current status and translation challenges.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Genying Xu; Xin Yao; Huirui Zhou; Boyang Lyu; Shuangshuang Pei; Ping Wen
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.671

9.  A simple and cost-effective approach to fabricate tunable length polymeric microneedle patches for controllable transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Yongli Chen; Yiwen Xian; Andrew J Carrier; Brian Youden; Mark Servos; Shufen Cui; Tiangang Luan; Sujing Lin; Xu Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Microneedle-Based Sensors for Sampling, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Özgecan Erdem; Ismail Eş; Garbis Atam Akceoglu; Yeşeren Saylan; Fatih Inci
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.